RCT of Two Noncrosslinked Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrices in Ab Wall Reconstruction
Prospective Trial Comparing the Performance Profiles of Two Non-Cross-Linked Porcine Dermal Matrices in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical outcomes of two commonly used, FDA-approved biologic meshes in hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction (Strattice and XenMatrix). The two meshes are derived from pig skin from which cells have been removed and which have been sterilized. The two meshes are made by two different companies using different processes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 27, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 6, 2025
CompletedJune 6, 2025
May 1, 2025
10.2 years
August 18, 2014
April 3, 2025
May 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) at 6 Week
Compare the rate of Surgical Site Occurrences (SSOs) between XenMatrix and Strattice in abdominal wall reconstruction at 1 year postoperatively. These include: 1. Infection 2. Seroma 3. Hematoma 4. Wound dehiscence 5. Skin necrosis 6. Formation of enterocutaneous fistula 7. Mesh infection
6 week postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Strattice
EXPERIMENTALAbdominal wall reconstruction with Strattice Assess pain intensity at last office visit preoperatively Assess pain interference at last office visit preoperatively Assess physical functioning at last office visit preoperatively Assess patient quality of life at last office visit preoperatively Assess patient pain intensity postoperatively Assess pain interference postoperatively Assess physical functioning postoperatively Assess quality of life postoperatively Assess hernia recurrence at 30 days postoperatively Assess bulge at 30 days postoperatively Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 30 days postoperatively Assess hernia recurrence at 1 year postoperatively Assess bulge at 1 year postoperatively Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 1 year postoperatively Assess overall complications at 30 days postoperatively Assess overall complications at 1 year postoperatively
XenMatrix
EXPERIMENTALAbdominal wall reconstruction with XenMatrix Assess pain intensity at last office visit preoperatively Assess pain interference at last office visit preoperatively Assess physical functioning at last office visit preoperatively Assess patient quality of life at last office visit preoperatively Assess patient pain intensity postoperatively Assess pain interference postoperatively Assess physical functioning postoperatively Assess quality of life postoperatively Assess hernia recurrence at 30 days postoperatively Assess bulge at 30 days postoperatively Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 30 days postoperatively Assess hernia recurrence at 1 year postoperatively Assess bulge at 1 year postoperatively Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 1 year postoperatively Assess overall complications at 30 days postoperatively Assess overall complications at 1 year postoperatively
Interventions
Abdominal wall reconstruction using Strattice
Assess patient pain intensity preoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess pain interference preoperatively using the PROMIS pain interference survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess physical functioning preoperatively using the PROMIS physical functioning survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess patient quality of life preoperatively, using the HerQLes survey (average of 1-3 weeks preoperatively)
Assess patient pain intensity at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Intensity survey
Assess pain interference at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Pain Interference survey
Assess physical functioning at 1 year postoperatively using the PROMIS Physical Functioning Survey
Assess quality of life at 1 year postoperatively using the HerQLes survey
Assess hernia recurrence at 30 days
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 30 days
Assess hernia recurrence at 1 year postoperatively
Assess Surgical Site Occurrences at 1 year postoperatively
Abdominal wall reconstruction with XenMatrix
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18
- Patients presenting for elective hernia repair, with Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grade 2 or above (Patients with a hernia who need hernia repair due to hernia size, discomfort, risk of bowel incarceration, effect on physical function), and who have comorbidities or contamination making the use of synthetic mesh contraindicated)
- Patients deemed to be good surgical candidates, with no active life-threatening cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, renal disease, hematologic disease (patients who can have a major surgical procedure without an exceedingly high risk of medical complications such as pulmonary edema, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, renal failure, life-threatening bleeding, stroke).
- Patients presenting for resection of large abdominal wall tumors who are expected to undergo have tumor extirpative defect that would require biologic mesh for closure (patients with a large tumor of the abdominal wall who will have a large defect in their fascia after resection, who need biologic mesh for reinforcement).
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy to porcine products
- Active smokers (within the past 4 weeks) presenting for elective hernia repair
- Patients with active life-threatening cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, renal disease, hematologic disease presenting for elective hernia repair
- Patients presenting for emergent hernia repair (in the setting of bowel strangulation, necrosis, penetrating trauma) as it will be difficult to consent those patients for the study preoperatively
- Patients with severe systemic sepsis
- Patients with frank purulence in the wound
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jeffrey Janislead
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was completed prior to the anticipated 70 total participants, as new data and literature have shifted a national trend away from the use of biologic mesh and toward synthetic mesh, which significantly impeded recruitment.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jeffrey Janis
- Organization
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey E Janis, MD
Ohio State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Plastic Surgery, Vice-Chairman
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2014
First Posted
August 29, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 27, 2025
Study Completion
March 27, 2025
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Results First Posted
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05