NCT02212977

Brief Summary

Hypothesis is that incision closure with octylcyanoacrylate is inferior to closure with stitches in Port a Cath patients, who, as a population, are at increased risk for complications. All adult patients who present for initial Port a Cath placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study. Subjects will be randomized to either skin incision closure with standard stitches or closure with skin glue. Time to complete skin closure and costs of closure will be compared. Patients will be evaluated approximately one month and three months from the procedure to assess for complications of wound breakdown or infection, as well as for the appearance of the Port a Cath incision.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
109

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 7, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 11, 2014

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 18, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 18, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 7, 2014

Results QC Date

June 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Port CatheterOctyl 2-cyanoacrylate2-octylcyanoacrylate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Participants With Complication of Wound Dehiscence

    To compare complication rates, including wound dehiscence and infection rates between implantable port incisions closed with topical skin adhesive versus absorbable subcuticular sutures.

    3 months

  • Number of Participants With Complication of Infection

    To compare complication rates, including wound dehiscence and infection rates between implantable port incisions closed with topical skin adhesive versus absorbable subcuticular sutures.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Healing-incision Cosmesis Score by Visual Analogue Scale

    3 months

  • Closure Time

    Baseline

  • Closure Materials Cost

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Suture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture

Procedure: Suture

Octylcyanoacrylate

EXPERIMENTAL

Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate

Device: Octylcyanoacrylate

Interventions

Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate

Also known as: Octyl 2-cyanoacrylate, 2-octylcyanoacrylate
Octylcyanoacrylate
SuturePROCEDURE

Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture

Suture

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All adult patients (≥18 years) who present for initial implantable port placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who cannot provide informed consent for the procedure will be excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Sutures

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Fixation DevicesSurgical EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Limitations and Caveats

Small sample size, underpowered to demonstrate small differences in rates of dehiscence or infection.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Charles Kim
Organization
Duke University Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Charles Kim, MD

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2014

First Posted

August 11, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

October 18, 2016

Results First Posted

October 18, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-10

Locations