Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
1 other identifier
interventional
109
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis is that incision closure with octylcyanoacrylate is inferior to closure with stitches in Port a Cath patients, who, as a population, are at increased risk for complications. All adult patients who present for initial Port a Cath placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study. Subjects will be randomized to either skin incision closure with standard stitches or closure with skin glue. Time to complete skin closure and costs of closure will be compared. Patients will be evaluated approximately one month and three months from the procedure to assess for complications of wound breakdown or infection, as well as for the appearance of the Port a Cath incision.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 18, 2016
CompletedOctober 18, 2016
October 1, 2016
1 year
August 7, 2014
June 20, 2016
October 14, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Complication of Wound Dehiscence
To compare complication rates, including wound dehiscence and infection rates between implantable port incisions closed with topical skin adhesive versus absorbable subcuticular sutures.
3 months
Number of Participants With Complication of Infection
To compare complication rates, including wound dehiscence and infection rates between implantable port incisions closed with topical skin adhesive versus absorbable subcuticular sutures.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Healing-incision Cosmesis Score by Visual Analogue Scale
3 months
Closure Time
Baseline
Closure Materials Cost
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORSkin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture
Octylcyanoacrylate
EXPERIMENTALSkin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate
Interventions
Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate
Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients (≥18 years) who present for initial implantable port placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who cannot provide informed consent for the procedure will be excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size, underpowered to demonstrate small differences in rates of dehiscence or infection.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Charles Kim
- Organization
- Duke University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles Kim, MD
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2014
First Posted
August 11, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 18, 2016
Results First Posted
October 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10