A Skin Glue Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Closure Study
Glue Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Closure: a Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
151
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare cesarean incision outcomes between patients with incision closed with the Dermabond Prineo system compared to standard subcuticular suture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 29, 2026
CompletedFebruary 25, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.3 years
June 6, 2023
December 5, 2025
February 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Scar Satisfaction Scale Score
The patient's satisfaction with their cesarean incision will be assessed using the validated Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) questionnaire. The PSAS is a 6-item questionnaire that is scored on a 1 (no complaints/as normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable/very different from normal skin) scale. Total scores range from 6-60, with a lower score indicating a greater level of patient satisfaction.
Assessed at 6-weeks postpartum
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Assessed during delivery hospitalization and at 6-week follow-up
Skin Closure Time
Intraoperative
Operative Time
Intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
Dermabond Prineo Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt time of cesarean delivery, patients in the Dermabond Prineo group will undergo skin closure with the Dermabond Prineo skin adhesive system.
Suture Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORAt time of cesarean delivery, patients in the Suture group will undergo skin closure with standard subcuticular suture.
Interventions
For subjects in the Dermabond Prineo group, the Dermabond Prineo system will be applied to the skin for skin closure under manufacturer's guidelines.
For subjects in the Suture group, the skin will be closed with the standard subcuticular suture method.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women age 18 years or older
- All women scheduled for primary or repeat cesarean deliveries
- All women undergoing intrapartum or antepartum cesarean delivery
- Pfannenstiel skin incision
- Birth of a live infant at time of cesarean delivery
You may not qualify if:
- Vertical skin incision
- Cesarean hysterectomy
- Emergency or stat cesarean delivery excluding standard preoperative preparation measures (i.e., use of Chlorhexidine skin prep, vaginal prep, etc)
- Intrapartum stillbirth
- Planned postpartum follow up at another facility
- Contraindications to routine postpartum pain medications
- Adhesive or tape allergy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NYP
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Related Publications (4)
Goto S, Sakamoto T, Ganeko R, Hida K, Furukawa TA, Sakai Y. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012124.pub2.
PMID: 32271475BACKGROUNDDumville JC, Coulthard P, Worthington HV, Riley P, Patel N, Darcey J, Esposito M, van der Elst M, van Waes OJ. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 28;2014(11):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub4.
PMID: 25431843BACKGROUNDvan de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6.
PMID: 16079683BACKGROUNDFleisher J, Khalifeh A, Pettker C, Berghella V, Dabbish N, Mackeen AD. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Nov;32(22):3830-3835. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1474870. Epub 2018 May 24.
PMID: 29739243BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Russell Miller, MD
- Organization
- Columbia University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Russell Miller, MD
Columbia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2023
First Posted
June 15, 2023
Study Start
August 23, 2023
Primary Completion
December 6, 2024
Study Completion
February 5, 2025
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Results First Posted
January 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02