An Assessment of Dual Site Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing
DOUBLE-CRT
Dual Site Left Endocardial Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We are investigating ways to help patients with heart failure, which is caused by damaged hearts which function less well, and cause symptoms of breathlessness, fatigue, lack of energy and swelling. Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) pacemakers are used to improve the pumping function of the main heart chamber in certain suitable people with heart failure. CRT requires a pacemaker with 2 wires, one placed inside the right heart chamber and one normally placed on the outside of the left heart chamber. These two wires act together to re-time the coordination of the heartbeat, which is known to improve heart function. The investigators are assessing whether they might be able to improve heart function even more by placing two wires on the inside of the left heart chamber, rather than one around the outside. The investigators wish to assess whether:
- 1.Using two wires within the left side of the heart gives a greater increase in heart function than one.
- 2.It is possible to choose the best spot inside of the heart by measuring the pattern of the heart beat.
- 3.Is it possible to use a different type of heart monitor placed outside the body instead of a monitor wire inside the heart to assess improvement in heart function? They are investigating this in people with hearts that beat less effectively than normal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Dec 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 4, 2021
CompletedMarch 4, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.9 years
August 1, 2014
May 19, 2020
February 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Acute Haemodynamic Response to Dual Left Ventricular Pacing
Acute haemodynamic response to pacing (change in Left Ventricular dP/dt max) between dual site Left Ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing Pacing protocols were performed with a baseline of 30 seconds of right ventricular pacing followed by two 30-second test configurations, and then a further baseline. The pacing configurations were tested, in a randomized order, 3 times each. Electrophysiology catheters were positioned at the right ventricular mid septum for baseline pacing, and at the left ventricular septum and at the left ventricular lateral wall, at the site of latest electrical activation i identified from a left ventricular electrical activation map This provided two single-site left ventricular pacing configurations, which could be combined to allow right ventricular and left ventricular lateral (Biventricular pacing) and left ventricular septal and left ventricular lateral (dual left ventricular pacing)
Mean of multiple recordings in each patient as detailed above
Study Arms (1)
Participants
EXPERIMENTALHaving an ablation procedure with access to the left side of the heart
Interventions
Pacing at several endocardial sites in isolation and individually will be performed, with response to this assessed by LV dp/dt max
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 60 years or above.
- Having a suitable Atrial Fibrillation/flutter or Ventricular Tachycardia ablation procedure
- Evidence of abnormal Left Ventricular structure and function, as shown by Left Ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%
You may not qualify if:
- Severe peripheral vascular disease (that would make arterial access more risky)
- Haemodynamic instability (such that a longer procedure is inadvisable)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7AT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Bordachar P, Derval N, Ploux S, Garrigue S, Ritter P, Haissaguerre M, Jais P. Left ventricular endocardial stimulation for severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10):747-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.038.
PMID: 20797486BACKGROUNDShetty AK, Sohal M, Chen Z, Ginks MR, Bostock J, Amraoui S, Ryu K, Rosenberg SP, Niederer SA, Gill J, Carr-White G, Razavi R, Rinaldi CA. A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study. Europace. 2014 Jun;16(6):873-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut420. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
PMID: 24525553BACKGROUNDRogers DP, Lambiase PD, Lowe MD, Chow AW. A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 May;14(5):495-505. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs004. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
PMID: 22312038BACKGROUNDBetts TR, Gamble JH, Khiani R, Bashir Y, Rajappan K. Development of a technique for left ventricular endocardial pacing via puncture of the interventricular septum. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;7(1):17-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001110. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
PMID: 24425419BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr James Gamble
- Organization
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS FT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tim R Betts, MD
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2014
First Posted
August 7, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 4, 2021
Results First Posted
March 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02