A Study of the Effectiveness of Fampridine in Improving Upper Limb Function in MS
A Phase IV Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Crossover Study of the Effectiveness of Oral Fampridine in Improving Upper Limb Function in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of treatment with fampridine in patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) or primary progressive MS (PPMS) with upper limb dysfunction (as defined by a 9-HPT time of between 15-90 seconds) and Kurtzke EDSS scores in the range 4.0-7.0 on upper limb function assessed by the nine-hole peg test (9-HPT) and the Jebson Taylor Hand Function Test (JTT). Fampridine has been shown to be effective in improving motor function, specifically walking ability in prior studies in this patient population and is currently licensed for this use in Europe and the United States. Upper limb dysfunction is common in SPMS and PPMS and often underestimated. Fampridine effects action potential conduction in demyelinated nerve fibres and we would hypothesise that the improvement previously reported in walking ability would be similar to that on upper limb dysfunction. Our study aims to address this question using both independent and patient reported outcomes in the context of a randomised placebo controlled crossover trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 16, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 9, 2021
CompletedJuly 9, 2021
July 1, 2021
2 years
May 19, 2014
February 25, 2021
July 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Classified as Upper Limb Responders on the 9 Hole Peg Test (9HPT)
9 Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs - this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. An upper limb responder is defined as a patient with both of the two "on treatment" 9 Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) assessments measured in seconds (assessments 4 \& 5 or 7 \& 8) improving 20% from the average of the baseline assessments (1, 2 \& 3). Washout assessment not included in the analysis.
20 weeks. Baseline assessments 1,2,3: weeks 0-2. Assessment 4 - midway through first treatment period; assessment 5: end of first treatment period. Assessment 7: midway through second treatment period, assessment 8: end of second treatment period.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants Defined as Upper Limb Responders on the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test (JTT)
20 weeks: Weeks 0-2: Assessment 1/2/3; Week 6: Assessment 4; Week 10: Assessment 5; Week 16: Assessment 7; Week 20: Assessment 8
The Number of Mobility Responders to Fampridine as Measured by an Improvement in the 25 Foot Timed Walk (T25FW)
20 weeks: Weeks 0-2: Assessment 1/2/3; Week 6: Assessment 4; Week 10: Assessment 5; Week 16: Assessment 7; Week 20: Assessment 8
Mean Scores in DASH - Fampridine and Placebo.
20 weeks: Assessments at Week 6 - midway through first treatment period, Week 10 - end of first treatment period, Week 16 - midway through second treatment period, Week 20 - end of second treatment period.
Mean Scores in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) - Fampridine and Placebo.
20 weeks: Assessments at Week 6 - midway through first treatment period, Week 10 - end of first treatment period, Week 16 - midway through second treatment period, Week 20 - end of second treatment period.
Mean Scores in the Disabilities in Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) Score Between Fampridine and Placebo.
20 weeks: Assessments at Week 6 - midway through first treatment period, Week 10 - end of first treatment period, Week 16 - midway through second treatment period, Week 20 - end of second treatment period.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
OTHERPatients will be randomised to a 8 week treatment period with the active drug followed by a 2 week washout period before an 8 week treatment period with placebo.
Group 2
OTHERPatients will be randomised to a 8 week treatment period with the placebo, followed by a 2 week washout period and a further 8 week treatment period with the active drug.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must be able and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this study protocol
- Subjects must be diagnosed with clinically definite SPMS or PPMS and be judged to be in generally good health by the investigator based upon the results of the medical history, laboratory tests (liver and renal function), physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiogram performed during Screening
- Subjects must be Male or female aged 18-70 at baseline
- Kurtzke EDSS scores in the range 4.0 to 7.0 inclusive
- Evidence of significant upper limb dysfunction as defined by a 9HPT of 15 - 90 seconds (dominant or non-dominant hand)
- Female subjects with reproductive capabilities must have a negative serum pregnancy test at baseline and agree to using an acceptable form of contraception for the duration of the study (barrier, coil or oral contraceptives only).
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy/sensitivity to study medications or their ingredients
- Female subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study.
- Subjects unable to provide written informed consent
- Subjects with a history of epilepsy or previous seizures (including provoked seizures).
- Subjects who have a history of drug or alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
- Subjects with an AST or ALT ≥ 3 x ULN on liver function tests
- Subjects have clinically significant ECG findings as judged by the investigator, in particular evidence of a cardiac conduction defect.
- Significant upper or lower limb arthritis as considered by the investigator to interfere with study assessments.
- Significant cognitive impairment as considered by the investigator to interfere with study assessments
- Subjects with clinically significant upper limb ataxia considered by the investigator to interfere with ability to complete study outcome measures.
- Patients with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance\<80ml/min) measured by 24-hour urine collection or estimated by the Cockcroft and Gault formula
- Subjects concomitantly using medicinal products that are inhibitors of Organic Cation Transporter 2 (OCT2) for example cimetidine
- Concurrent treatment with other medicinal products containing fampridine (4- aminopyridine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
St Vincent's University Hospital
Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
St. Vincents University Hospital
Dublin, D4, Ireland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Christopher McGuigan
- Organization
- St. Vincent's University Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher McGuigan, MD
University College Dublin, St Vincent's University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Neurologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2014
First Posted
August 4, 2014
Study Start
February 21, 2014
Primary Completion
February 16, 2016
Study Completion
February 16, 2016
Last Updated
July 9, 2021
Results First Posted
July 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07