NCT02205619

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the residual cementum with the histological measurements and root surface topography with SEM evaluation using four periodontal treatment methods.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2014

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 24, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 31, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 24, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Residual cementumroot surface instrumentationultrasonic scalingair polishing with glycine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • thickness of cementum

    After instrumentations the teeth extractions (n=48) were done and the teeth were stored in the solution of NaCl. Upon extracting the teeth were sectioned perpendicularly to the root axis with a microtome (Leica, RM2245, Wetzlar, Germany) between 10 and 15 µm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Leica Autostainer XL, Wetzlar, Germany). Two horizontally root sections of each tooth were taken from coronal and apical part of instrumented area for a total 96 histologic specimens. Coronal sections were taken 1 mm apically from the gingival margin, whereas apical sections were taken 1 mm coronally from the endpoint of periodontal pocket. The teeth were examined by an optic microscope (Nikon Eclipse i5, Tokyo, Japan) connected to a camera (Nikon, DS-Filc, Tokyo, Japan) and finally to a dedicated computer. The thickness of the cementum was measured by a specific software (Nikon, NIS Elements 4.0, Tokyo, Japan).

    within the first 60 days after extractions

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Remaining calculus index (RCI) with SEM evaluation

    within 30 days after extractions

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Roughness Loss of Tooth Substance Index (RLTSI) with SEM evaluation

    within 30 days after teeth extractions

Study Arms (4)

Ultrasonic instrumentation

EXPERIMENTAL

Prior to extraction, the teeth (N = 12) were randomly included into ultrasonic instrumentation (Air Flow Master Piezon®, EMS SA, Nyon - Swiss) treatment group

Device: Air Flow Master Piezon®, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss

Hand instrumentation

EXPERIMENTAL

Prior to extraction, the teeth (N = 12) were randomly included into hand curette (Gracey curettes, American Eagle, Missoula, MT, USA) treatment group hand instrumentation (Gracey curettes 5/6, 11/12, 13/14 American Eagle, Missoula, MT, USA)

Device: Gracey curettes, American Eagle, Missoula, MT, USA

subgingival airpolishing with glycine

EXPERIMENTAL

Prior to extraction, the teeth (N = 12) were randomly included into air-polishing (Air Flow Master Piezon®, EMS SA, Nyon - Swiss) with the glycine powder (Air-flow® Powder Perio, EMS) treatment group. subgingival airpolishing with glycine(Air-flow® Powder Perio, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss)

Device: Air-flow® Powder Perio, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss

ultrasonic following airpolishing

EXPERIMENTAL

Prior to extraction, the teeth (N = 12) were randomly included into ultrasonic following airpolishing ( Air Flow Master Piezon®, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss) (Air-flow® Powder Perio, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss) with the glycine powder treatment group

Device: Air Flow Master Piezon®, EMS SA, Nyon, SwissDevice: Air-flow® Powder Perio, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss

Interventions

comparison of different instruments on root cementum: Instrumentations with US devices ( Air Flow Master Piezon®, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss) were performed with medium power settings and with the use of water cooling (as instructed by the manufacturer). One approximal root surface (distal and mesial) of each tooth was randomly subjected to debridement and the other approximal surface was used as control. All the instrumentations of teeth were performed by a single operator. The criteria for adequate treatment were smooth, hard root surfaces, with no remnants of calculus. The cleanliness and smoothness of the root surface were checked using a fine dental explorer. The instrumentations were done under local anesthesia.

Also known as: Piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation
Ultrasonic instrumentationultrasonic following airpolishing

comparison of different instruments on root cementum Hand instruments (Gracey curettes 5/6, 11/12, 13/14 American Eagle, Missoula, MT, USA) were used for subgingival root instrumentation. The criteria for adequate treatment were smooth, hard root surfaces, with no remnants of calculus. The cleanliness and smoothness of the root surface were checked using a fine dental explorer. The instrumentations were done under local anesthesia.

Also known as: hand instrumentation
Hand instrumentation

comparison of different instruments on root cementum: Instrumentations with air polishing (Air-flow® Powder Perio, EMS SA, Nyon, Swiss) were performed with a special nozzle and medium power settings and with the use of water cooling (as instructed by the manufacturer). One approximal root surface (distal and mesial) of each tooth was randomly subjected to debridement and the other approximal surface was used as control. All the measurements and instrumentations of teeth were performed by a single operator. The criteria for adequate treatment were smooth, hard root surfaces, with no remnants of calculus. The cleanliness and smoothness of the root surface were checked using a fine dental explorer. The instrumentations were done under local anesthesia

Also known as: subgingival airpolishing with glycine
subgingival airpolishing with glycineultrasonic following airpolishing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • systemic factors (no systemic diseases; no medications affecting periodontal status in the previous 6 months; no pregnancy or lactation;
  • behavioral factors (no smoking habits);
  • dental and periodontal factors not to have had previous periodontal therapy; no class III dental mobility;
  • a periodontal probing depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm in at least two sites per tooth with single rooted ;
  • have no caries or restorations on the mesial and distal surfaces and bleeding on probing.

You may not qualify if:

  • systemic diseases; medications affecting periodontal status in the previous 6 months; pregnancy or lactation
  • smoking habits
  • have caries or restorations on the mesial and distal surfaces and bleeding on probing.
  • have had previous periodontal therapy; class III dental mobility;

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Esra Bozbay, Dr

    *Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Francesco Dominici, Dr

    *Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Serdar Cintan, Prof

    †Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Aslan Yasar Gokbuget, Prof

    †Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Luigi Guida, Prof

    ‡Department of Odontostomatological, Orthodontic and Surgical Disciplines, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mehmet Serif Aydin, MSc Bio

    §Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Andrea Pilloni, Prof

    *Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2014

First Posted

July 31, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

January 1, 2014

Study Completion

July 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 31, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-07