NCT02203786

Brief Summary

To determine if:

  1. 1.pathological gambling is similar to psychostimulant addiction as reflected by parallel roles for D1 and D2 receptors in gambling and stimulant reinforcement.
  2. 2.these parallel roles are linked with gambling pathology or if they are evident in both gamblers and controls.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 23, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2014

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 25, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2016

Status Verified

April 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

5.8 years

First QC Date

July 23, 2014

Results QC Date

January 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

amphetamined1 and d2 receptorsdopamine antagonistspathological gamblingprimingreinforcement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Subjective Reinforcement Self-report Scales

    Self-reported Confidence to Refrain from Gambling (0 - 10) was assessed at test session baseline, before the slot machine and after the slot machine (Phase 1); and before amphetamine and at peak amphetamine (Phase 2). The maximum score (10) denotes complete confidence to refrain from gambling (i.e., NO urge or compulsion to gamble); the minimum score (0) denotes complete lack of confidence to refrain from gambling (i.e., overwhelming urge to gamble). Scores between 10 and 0 denote intermediate confidence to refrain from gambling with LOWER scores denoting less confidence to refrain from gambling -- i.e., GREATER urge or compulsive motivation to gamble. Scores shown are based on single item visual analogue ratings 0-10 from each participant at the specified time point. The mean (SD) of these single item ratings is presented for each sub-group.

    At key points in testing: immediately after the slot machine game, and at expected peak subjective-behavioral effects for amphetamine (90-minutes post-capsule administration).

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

    At key points in testing: immediately after the slot machine game (change from session baseline), and at expected peak subjective-behavioral effects for amphetamine (90-minutes post-capsule administration)(change from session baseline).

  • Cognitive Task Performance

    At key points during testing: immediately after the slot machine, at expected peak subjective-behavioral effects for amphetamine (90-minutes post-capsule administration)

  • Betting Behaviour in Laboratory-based Slot Machine Game

    1x per test session (total of 4 test sessions) for duration of the study: 4 weeks (1 session/week)

  • Speed of Play on Slot Machine Game

    15-minutes

  • Winnings on Slot Machine Upon Completion of Game

    15-minutes

Study Arms (2)

Haloperidol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects randomized to pre-treatment drug sequence 1 (haloperidol on day 1 of each phase), or drug sequence 2 (haloperidol on day 2 of each phase). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg haloperidol OR 3 visually identical placebo (lactose) capsules Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), this will consist of 2 dummy capsules, visually identical to those administered for dose 1. On sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II), the dose will consist of 2 visually identical capsules each containing 10 mg dexedrine. Response measured to 15 min session of a commercial slot machine game.

Drug: HaloperidolDrug: DexedrineDrug: PlaceboBehavioral: Slot Machine

Fluphenazine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects randomized to pre-treatment drug sequence 1 (fluphenazine on day 1 of each phase), or drug sequence 2 (fluphenazine on day 2 of each phase). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg fluphenazine OR 3 visually identical placebo (lactose) capsules Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), this will consist of 2 dummy capsules, visually identical to those administered for dose 1. On sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II), the dose will consist of 2 visually identical capsules each containing 10 mg dexedrine. Response measured to 15 min session of a commercial slot machine game.

Drug: FluphenazineDrug: DexedrineDrug: PlaceboBehavioral: Slot Machine

Interventions

Dose/maximum dose = 3-mg; route = oral. Participants assigned to the haloperidol antagonist group will receive 2 doses (@ 3 mg) on alternate sessions (with minimum of 2 weeks between individual doses). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg haloperidol.

Also known as: Teva-Haloperidol, DIN: 00396818, Haldol
Haloperidol

Dose/maximum dose = 3-mg; route = oral. Participants assigned to the fluphenazine antagonist group will receive 2 doses (@ 3 mg) on alternate sessions (with minimum of 2 weeks between individual doses). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg fluphenazine.

Also known as: APO-Fluphenazine, DIN: 00405345, Prolixin, Permitil
Fluphenazine

Dose/maximum dose = 20-mg; route = oral. All participants will receive 2 doses (@ 20 mg) during Phase II - sessions 3, 4, with minimum 1 week between individual doses. Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II), the dose will consist of 2 visually identical capsules each containing 10 mg D-amphetamine.

Also known as: Dextro-amphetamine sulphate, DIN: 01924516, D-amphetamine
FluphenazineHaloperidol

Dose 1: On alternate sessions (1 and 3 or 2 and 4, depending on counterbalancing) participants will receive 3 visually identical placebo (lactose) capsules. Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), this will consist of 2 dummy capsules, visually identical to those administered for dose 1.

Also known as: lactose capsule
FluphenazineHaloperidol
Slot MachineBEHAVIORAL

15 minute play of a commercial slot machine game in bar-simulated laboratory setting.

Also known as: reward cue
FluphenazineHaloperidol

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS
  • otherwise healthy, non-treatment seeking, non-abstinent
  • male or female
  • ages 19-65
  • DSM-IV PG symptom scale score \> 5
  • SOGS (South Oaks Gambling Screen) score \> 5
  • nicotine dependence acceptable
  • CONTROLS
  • healthy
  • male or female
  • ages 19-65
  • DSM-IV PG symptom scale score = 0
  • SOGS score = 0
  • nicotine dependence acceptable
  • must have played slot machine \> 5 times

You may not qualify if:

  • both Pathological Gamblers and Controls
  • Axis I psychopathology aside from nicotine dependence (or PG) based on SCID
  • Schizotypal or Borderline Personality Disorder based on psychiatric interview
  • Family history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
  • English comprehension below grade 7 level.
  • ADS (Alcohol Dependence Scale) \> 13 (more than low dependence)
  • BDI (Beck Depression Inventory) short form \> 10 (more than low depression)
  • DAST (Drug Abuse Screening Test) \> 4 (possible drug abuse)
  • Consumption of \> 20/15 (men/women) standard alcoholic drinks/ week (hazardous drinking)
  • Smoking \> 20 cigarettes/day to help minimize withdrawal symptoms during test phase
  • Any prior use of psychostimulant drugs
  • Current use of medication that could interact with any of the study medications
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • APA (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. IV-TR ed. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.

    BACKGROUND
  • Enggasser JL, de Wit H. Haloperidol reduces stimulant and reinforcing effects of ethanol in social drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Oct;25(10):1448-56.

    PMID: 11696664BACKGROUND
  • Holley FO, Magliozzi JR, Stanski DR, Lombrozo L, Hollister LE. Haloperidol kinetics after oral and intravenous doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983 Apr;33(4):477-84. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1983.65.

    PMID: 6831826BACKGROUND
  • Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;144(9):1184-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184.

    PMID: 3631315BACKGROUND
  • Midha KK, McKay G, Edom R, Korchinski ED, Hawes EM, Hall K. Kinetics of oral fluphenazine disposition in humans by GC-MS. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;25(5):709-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00542363.

    PMID: 6662169BACKGROUND
  • Wachtel SR, Ortengren A, de Wit H. The effects of acute haloperidol or risperidone on subjective responses to methamphetamine in healthy volunteers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Sep 1;68(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00104-7.

    PMID: 12167550BACKGROUND
  • Wong YN, Wang L, Hartman L, Simcoe D, Chen Y, Laughton W, Eldon R, Markland C, Grebow P. Comparison of the single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of modafinil and dextroamphetamine administered alone or in combination in healthy male volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;38(10):971-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04395.x.

    PMID: 9807980BACKGROUND
  • Zack M, Lobo D, Biback C, Fang T, Smart K, Tatone D, Kalia A, Digiacomo D, Kennedy JL. Priming effects of a slot machine game and amphetamine on probabilistic risk-taking in people with gambling disorder and healthy controls. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb;45(1):31-60. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2187041. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gambling

Interventions

HaloperidolFluphenazineDextroamphetamineLactose

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Risk-TakingBehaviorDisruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ButyrophenonesKetonesOrganic ChemicalsPhenothiazinesSulfur CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAmphetamineAmphetaminesPhenethylaminesEthylaminesAminesDisaccharidesOligosaccharidesPolysaccharidesCarbohydratesSugars

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Daniela Lobo, Qualified Investigator for Study, Clinician-Scientist
Organization
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Study Officials

  • Daniela Lobo, MD, Ph.D.

    Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinician Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2014

First Posted

July 30, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 25, 2016

Results First Posted

April 25, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations