NCT02199093

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of a mixed intervention of occupational therapy (rehabilitative and compensatory approach) at home to upper limb apraxia in mild and moderate patients post stroke in comparison to a control group with a traditional health educative protocol.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 21, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2014

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 5, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

July 21, 2014

Last Update Submit

October 4, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

MeSH terms:ApraxiasApraxia, IdeomotorStrokeCerebral StrokeRehabilitationOccupational therapyTreatment OutcomeActivities of Daily Living

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from Baseline in Barthel index at 8 weeks

    This test can be recommended as an instrument of choice for measuring physical disability and is useful in assessing functional disability in basic activities of daily living, obtaining a quantitative estimate of the degree of dependence of the subject. It has good interobserver reliability with Kappa index between 0.47 and 1.00. According to intraobserver reliability, Kappa index between 0.84 and 0.97 was obtained.

    Eight weeks

  • Change from Baseline in Barthel index at 16 weeks

    Sixteen weeks

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Change from baseline in observation and scoring of ADL-Activities at 8 weeks

    Eight weeks

  • Change from baseline in the Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) at 8 weeks

    Eight weeks

  • Change from baseline in De Renzi Test (ideational apraxia) at 8 weeks

    Eight weeks

  • Change from baseline in De Renzi Test (ideomotor apraxia) at 8 weeks

    Eight weeks

  • Change from baseline in recognition of gestures (Smania, 2000) at 8 weeks

    Eight weeks

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Functional Rehabilitation of apraxia

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants will be randomly assigned to an experimental group, to receive intervention in upper limb apraxia at home since two approaches, a rehabilitative and another compensatory (providing adaptive strategies at home). The treatment will be performed three times a week, 30 minutes a day, during a 4-week period.

Other: Functional Rehabilitation of apraxia

Traditional health educative protocol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group will receive treatment with a traditional health educative protocol to improve his functionality in activities of daily living. The treatment will be performed twice in two month.

Other: Traditional health educative protocol

Interventions

The intervention will cover every type of approaches related with upper limb apraxia. We will use different kinds of tools to activate cerebral networks implied on apraxia, for facilitating the cerebral neuroplasticity in the recovering of the patient. On the other hand, when the function can not be improved, we will provide skills and strategies for enhance the environment adaptation and increasing the autonomy and independence.

Also known as: Intervention of occupational therapy in apraxia
Functional Rehabilitation of apraxia

The traditional health educative protocol consist in an educational workshop for patients and caregivers where they are taught the implications of apraxia in their daily live, kind of errors of apraxia for gaining consciousness of the syndrome, and some strategies to facilitate the adaptation of the patient in her house.

Also known as: Traditional intervention in apraxia
Traditional health educative protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Mild-moderate stroke after two month of the cerebrovascular attack.
  • Upper limb apraxia lasting at least 2 months.
  • Less than 9 points in validated Apraxia Screen of TULIA (AST) following Vanbellingen et al., 2010.
  • Voluntary participation.
  • The neurologist, the occupational therapist and the patient judge the intervention to be necessary.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of apraxia before current stroke.
  • Stroke had occurred less than two months or more than twenty four month ago.
  • Cognitive impairment (\< 23 in normal school population and \< 20 points with a low education or illiteracy, in Spanish validation of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)).
  • Severe aphasia.
  • Previous brain tumour.
  • History of other previous neurologic disorders.
  • Mother tongue different to Spanish.
  • Drugs addiction.
  • Intellectual or learning disorders.
  • Brain damage for traumatism or neurodegenerative process.
  • A history of serious consciousness impairments
  • Uncooperativeness, presence of orthopedic or other disabling disorders.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Granada and University hospital "San Cecilio"

Granada, 18012, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME, Toledano-Moreno S, Garcia-Rios MC, Tapia-Haro RM, Barrero-Hernandez FJ, Casas-Barragan A, Perez-Marmol JM. Effectiveness of a Functional Rehabilitation Program for Upper Limb Apraxia in Poststroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May;102(5):940-950. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

  • Perez-Marmol JM, Garcia-Rios MC, Barrero-Hernandez FJ, Molina-Torres G, Brown T, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME. Functional rehabilitation of upper limb apraxia in poststroke patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Nov 5;16:508. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1034-1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeApraxiasApraxia, Ideomotor

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPsychomotor DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • MÂȘ Encarnacion ME Aguilar, PdH

    Department of Physiotherapy. Faculty of Sciences of Health. University of Granada (Granada). Spain

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Functional Rehabilitation of upper limb apraxia in patients Poststroke: Randomized Clinical Trial

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2014

First Posted

July 24, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 1, 2018

Last Updated

October 5, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations