Clinical Effect Size of an Educational Intervention in the Home and Compliance on People Who Suffer From Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background. Cognitive, communication and physical weakness combined with environmental changes frequently cause changes in roles, routines and daily occupations. The educational intervention combines the best choice for teaching new behaviours since it involves the active participation of the patient in learning. Methods. Design. Randomized clinical trial. Participants. Total sample: 80 adults who have suffered a stroke with moderate severity and who have been discharged to their homes.Outcome variables. BI, FIM, MMSE, CNS, SIS-16, TCT, MRS, MSPSS, QLSF, FRT, RT, TUG, TST, a portable dynamometer and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Data analysis. Descriptive analyses will include mean and 95% CI of the values for each variable. The Kolmogov-Smirnov (KS) test and a 2x2 mixed model ANOVA will be used. Intergroup effect sizes will be calculated (Cohen's d).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedSeptember 30, 2019
March 1, 2017
4.4 years
October 14, 2013
September 27, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Barthel Index
The 10-item Barthel Index was published in 1965 as a simple index of functional independence, particularly in personal and domestic activities of daily living. This instrument consists of 10 items on activities of daily living (grooming, dressing, bathing, and bowel and bladder status), each with 2 or 4 response categories (0-3 points).Total score range from 0 to 100. Houlden H, Edwards M, McNeil J, Greenwood R. Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Feb;20(2):153-9. Grauwmeijer E, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Haitsma IK, Ribbers GM. A prospective study on employment outcome 3 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):993-9. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3.
Change from Baseline to 2, 4, 12 and 22 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Canadian Neurological Scale
Change from Baseline to 2, 4, 12 and 22 weeks
Stroke impact scale-16
Change from Baseline to 2, 4, 12 and 22 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination
Change from Baseline to 2, 4, 12 and 22 weeks
Functional Independence Measure
Change from Baseline to 2, 4, 12 and 22 weeks
Trunk Control Test
Change from Baseline to 2, 4, 12 and 22 weeks
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONAssessment of each participant's home and his or her performance of ADL.
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALEducational intervention: Assessment of each participant's home and his or her performance of ADL and the therapist will provide to the participants of the experimental group a list of advice related to the HTAS items that are evaluated negatively.
Application smartphone-based group
EXPERIMENTALSmartphone-based application group (SG) sample will have a reminder. The app will provide the advice previously given by the therapist in the participants' homes.
Non Application smartphone-based group
NO INTERVENTIONNon Smartphone-based application group (NSG) sample won't have a reminder
Interventions
All subjects received an educational intervention consist in an educational advice provides by the therapist to improve the adherence of the treatment.
Smartphone-based application group (SG) sample will have a reminder. The app will provide the advice previously given by the therapist in the participants' homes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute Stroke (\<3 months since the discharge to their homes)
- A score from 20 to 50 on Barthel Index
- A score from 35 to 75 on Functional Independence Measure
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment (scoring 0-17 in the Mini-Mental State Examination)
- Inability to walk 3 meters without physical assistance
- Inability to stay standing more than 30 "without physical support
- Serious communication or comprehension problems
- Surgical intervention in lower limbs 12 months prior to recruitment
- Secondary neurological pathology
- Severe cardiovascular, respiratory, orthopedic or metabolic problems
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
IBIMA
Málaga, Malaag, 29017, Spain
Patronato Municipal de deportes de Torremolinos
Torremolinos, Malaga, 29620, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Crocker TF, Brown L, Lam N, Wray F, Knapp P, Forster A. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):CD001919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub4.
PMID: 34813082DERIVEDMerchan-Baeza JA, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas A. Clinical effect size of an educational intervention in the home and compliance with mobile phone-based reminders for people who suffer from stroke: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Mar 10;4(1):e33. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4034.
PMID: 25757808DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antonio I Cuesta Vargas, PhD
University of Malaga
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2013
First Posted
November 11, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2017-03