NCT02190435

Brief Summary

There are approximately 250,000 hip fractures in the US every year, and intertrochanteric (IT) fractures (fractures that occur just below the femoral head) account for nearly half of these fractures. The use of intramedullary (IM) nails for fixation of IT femur fractures has become a well-accepted and increasingly more common procedure among orthopaedic traumatologists, and is standard of care at our institution. While advancements in intramedullary nail fixation have made it a relatively efficient procedure, the placement of the lag screw into the femoral head still remains a challenging step in the procedure. Inaccurate placement can lead to screw cut-out, one of the most commonly reported complications with IM nail fixation. Previous work has shown that the lag screw position is an important factor in reducing screw cut-out. This step of the procedure can be time demanding and often requires several intraoperative radiographs for accurate placement. Recently developed computer-assisted navigation systems provide surgeons with the ability to track screw placement in real-time. This could allow for improved screw placement and potentially reduce radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon. To date, the potential advantages of computer-assisted navigation have not been examined. The primary objective of this study is to examine whether the use of Stryker's ADAPT computer-assisted navigation for Gamma nail fixation can result in improved lag screw placement. The secondary objective is to examine whether the use of the ADAPT for Gamma nail fixation can reduce intraoperative radiation exposure.Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in the lag screw placement (i.e. tip to apex distance measurement) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation. Additionally, we hypothesize that there is a difference in radiation exposure (i.e. fluoroscopy time) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
65

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 11, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 24, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 24, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

July 11, 2014

Results QC Date

April 17, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Computer-assisted navigationADAPTIntramedullary nailIntertrochanteric femur fracture

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tip-to-apex Distance

    Distance between lag screw tip and head surface as measured on the ADAPT system

    Intraoperative

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Radiation Exposure

    Intraoperative

Study Arms (2)

ADAPT

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients that receive intramedullary nail fixation with use of the Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation system

Device: Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients that receive conventional technique intramedullary nail fixation without use of the Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation system

Device: Conventional technique

Interventions

Adaptive Positioning Technology for Gamma 3

ADAPT

Conventional Technique

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing hip fracture fixation with a Gamma Nail by one of four orthopaedic trauma surgeons at William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak
  • Diagnosis of an intertrochanteric femur fracture (AO Classification 31-A1,A2)
  • Low energy mechanism of injury (i.e. fall, twist)

You may not qualify if:

  • Minors (less than 18 years)
  • Pregnant
  • Have a high energy mechanism of injury (e.g. motor vehicle accident, fall from height)
  • Have an open fracture (i.e. the skin is broken at the fracture site), or
  • Present with multiple injuries to the ipsilateral lower extremity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012.

    PMID: 7608228BACKGROUND
  • Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

    PMID: 20832795BACKGROUND
  • Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2010 Jun;34(5):719-22. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

    PMID: 19618186BACKGROUND
  • De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G. Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1266-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357.

    PMID: 22810396BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Denise Koueiter, MS
Organization
William Beaumont Hospital

Study Officials

  • Kevin Grant, MD

    Corewell Health East

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2014

First Posted

July 15, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 24, 2017

Results First Posted

May 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations