NCT02185768

Brief Summary

The most frequently used products in CHE are doxorubicin (36%), cisplatin (31%), and epirubicin (12%). But until recently, there were no obvious reasons to use one product over another. In fact, systemic chemotherapy is considered ineffective in HCC \[hepatocellular carcinoma\], which does not allow any argument in favour of the product. Moreover, 2 randomised trials comparing the molecules (doxorubicin vs. epirubicin) proved to be negative in terms of survival. Cytotoxicity of different anticancer agents on HCC cell lines have been compared in order to select the best candidate for CHE. Eleven chemotherapy molecules have been tested, including those more frequently used in CHE. Among them, idarubicin (an anthracycline) proved to be the most effective in vitro by far. The superiority of idarubicin (as opposed to doxorubicin) was noted especially on the SNU-449 line, which is known for its resistance to several chemotherapy agents. The best cytotoxicity of idarubicin can be explained by 2 mechanisms: 1) idarubicin has a better intracellular penetration than the other anthracyclines. This is probably due to its more considerable lipophily, facilitating thus its passage through the membrane made up of a double lipid layer, 2) idarubicin is resistant to the multidrug resistance system (MDR). The MDR mechanism, which is often noted in HCC, consists of membrane pumps transporting the molecule outside the cell. These two particularities could explain a more significant accumulation of idarubicin in the HCC cells, and thus better efficacy. It is interesting to note that orally administered idarubicin (5 mg/day for 21 days) has proved to be less toxic and is effective in HCC. Currently, idarubicin is used to treat leukaemia. Its toxicity profile (especially, haematological and cardiac) is known. On these grounds, A pilot study has been conducted in order to assess the tolerance and efficacy of lipiodol-based CHE using a 10 mg dose of idarubicin in 21 patients with unresectable HCC. These preliminary data reveal that CHE with idarubicin is effective and less toxic. Idarubicin can be loaded in microbeads. A phase I study (IDASPHERE) has been conducted on DC Beads® microbeads (300-500µm) loaded with idarubicin (dose increased from 5 to 25 mg). The DLT \[dose-limiting toxicity\] and MTD \[maximum tolerated dose\] have been determined in 21 patients using a CRM. The MTD of idarubicin was assessed at 10 mg. In our study, the idarubicin-loaded beads did not give rise to any specific toxicity-related problem. The 10 mg dose is compatible with the known toxicity profile of idarubicin: cumulative cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin is noted from 550 mg/m², whereas that of idarubicin is noted from 93 mg/m². There is thus a 5.9:1 ratio between their cumulative toxicities. The most frequently used dose (and also the weakest one) for the doxorubicin-based CHE is 50 mg. The equivalent of the idarubicin dose would thus be: 50 mg (doxorubicin) / 5.9 (doxorubicin/idarubicin ratio) = approx. 10 mg of idarubicin. It has been already demonstrated that hepatic extraction of idarubicin is better than those of doxorubicin and daunorubicin in an animal sarcoma model. In this study, AUC 0-48h and AUC 0-72h were 1.35 times higher with idarubicin, proving that its intra-hepatic penetration was 35% higher. The randomised phase II PRECISION V study compared conventional CHE (cCHE) with CHE by doxorubicin beads (DC Bead®) in patients with HCC. It is currently the largest randomised trial on CHE published. The PRECISION V data can be thus used to compare the other studies in terms of efficacy and tolerance. To continue our preliminary study and the phase I IDASPHERE study, investigators wish to assess thus the efficacy and confirm the tolerance of idarubicin-loaded beads for the CHE of HCC according to a protocol similar to PRECISION V, as part of a single-arm phase II study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2017

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 4, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

July 3, 2014

Results QC Date

August 19, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Liver cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Complete Response or Partial Response (Objective Response), as Assessed According Central Review

    The main judgement criterion is the rate of patients in objective response (complete or partial response) at 6 months according to the mRECIST criteria and based on the central review. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST v1.0) for target lesions was assessed by MRI Complete Response (CR) was defined as : Disappearance of all target lesions and Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Objective Response was defind as the number of patients with a CR or a PR.

    up to 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Participants With Complete Response or Partial Response (Objective Response), as Assessed by the Investigator

    up to 6 months

  • Best Response According to mRECIST v1.0 in MRI

    up to 6 months after last chemoembolisation

  • Progression-Free Survival

    up to 2 years

  • Overall Survival

    up to 3 years

Study Arms (1)

DC-BEADS + Idarubicin

EXPERIMENTAL

Chemoembolization with DC BEAD loaded with idarubicin

Drug: idarubicinDevice: Dc- Beads 300-500µm

Interventions

DC-BEADS + Idarubicin
DC-BEADS + Idarubicin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- Histologically diagnosed HCC or HCC diagnosed according to the EASL criteria
  • Measurable targets according to the mRECIST v1.1 criterion
  • Preserved liver function (in case of Child-Pugh A or B7 cirrhosis)
  • Tumour not subject to interventive care (liver transplant, surgical resection or percutaneous destruction)
  • BCLC A/B without portal or extra-hepatic invasion
  • No prior treatment by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or transarterial embolisation (with or without chemotherapy)
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • WHO 0 or 1
  • Laboratory test: platelets ≥ 50,000 mm3, N ≥ 1,000/mm3, creatininaemia ≤ 150 µmol/L, PT ≥ 50%
  • No heart failure (isotope or ultrasound VEF \> 50%)

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Advanced tumour (vascular or extra-hepatic invasion including brain metastasis or diffuse HCC with liver invasion \> 50%)
  • History of other type of cancer except cancer known to be in remission for more than 5 years (in this case, HCC histological proof is required), or basal-cell carcinoma or in situ cervix uteri cancer properly treated with curative treatment
  • Advanced liver disease (Child B8, B9 and C, bilirubinaemia \> 3 mg/dL, SGOT and SGPT \> 5 x ULN or 250 U/L)
  • Previous treatment by idarubicin and/or doxorubicin
  • Idarubicin contraindications (cardiopathy with myocardial failure, serious kidney or liver failure, yellow fever vaccine)
  • Concurrent disease or uncontrolled severe clinical condition
  • Uncontrolled severe infection
  • Patient requiring long-term anticoagulant treatment
  • Thrombosis of the portal vein or a 3-segment region or more
  • Hepatofugal portal venous flow
  • Presence of serious atheromatosis
  • Presence of collateral vascular ways potentially affecting the normal regions during embolisation
  • Presence of arthritis of the hepatic artery branches to be treated
  • Presence of arterioportal or arterial subhepatic fistula that cannot be embolised by coils
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

CHU Amiens

Amiens, France

Location

CHU d'ANGERS

Angers, 49933, France

Location

CHU - Hôpital François Mitterand

Dijon, 21079, France

Location

Hôpital La Croix Rousse

Lyon, 69317, France

Location

Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, 69437, France

Location

CHU St Eloi

Montpellier, 34295, France

Location

Hôpital de l'Archet II

Nice, 06202, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Guiu B, Chevallier P, Assenat E, Barbier E, Merle P, Bouvier A, Dumortier J, Nguyen-Khac E, Gugenheim J, Rode A, Oberti F, Valette PJ, Yzet T, Chevallier O, Barbare JC, Latournerie M, Boulin M. Idarubicin-loaded Beads for Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The IDASPHERE II Single-Arm Phase II Trial. Radiology. 2019 Jun;291(3):801-808. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182399. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver Neoplasms

Interventions

Idarubicin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DaunorubicinAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPolycyclic CompoundsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydrates

Results Point of Contact

Title
Karine Le Malicot
Organization
Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive

Study Officials

  • Boris GUIU, PhD

    Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2014

First Posted

July 10, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

October 1, 2017

Study Completion

October 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 4, 2025

Results First Posted

October 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations