NCT02185521

Brief Summary

Philips has developed a new algorithm, called Hemodynamic Instability Rules Based Advisor (HIRBA 2.0) system, for the prediction of hemodynamic instability in critically ill patients, who were not previously known to be at risk. This algorithm provides with the numerical index - Hemodynamic Instability Index (HII) and its trend which are calculated from existing real time data derived from patient's current hospital stay such as heart rate and blood pressure, labs, and Admission - Discharge- Transfer (ADT) data to help healthcare providers obtain information about patient's status and make clinical decisions. The aim of the study is to determine if the patient clinical information, displayed in the form of HII, can prompt possible patient hemodynamic status change and trigger earlier clinical care team response. We hypothesize that this real-time information on hemodynamic instability and earlier clinical decision making will lead to reduced length of stay (LOS) and ICU mortality relative to standard care practice. Study will also identify if the use of the Philips new algorithm called Hemodynamic Instability Rules Based Advisor (HIRBA 2.0) can improve outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs). During this study, upon patient admission to the ICU clinical data collection will begin. Data that will be pulled during the study includes: vital signs, medications, reason for admission to the ICU, treatments that patient may receive. Research subjects will not be asked to do anything as far as specific activities expected to be accomplished during study participation. Subjects will be involved in the study only during their stay in ICU. HII information will be visible to clinicians, taking care of this patient only during his/ her stay in the study unit. Study team will collect patient information and have the ability to view the HII for subjects. Once patient leaves the ICU the study team will collect information on the remainder of patient's hospital course including date of hospital discharge. All collected data will be then fully de-identified and released to Philips for analysis.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
127

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2014

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 18, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 18, 2016

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 7, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

June 24, 2014

Results QC Date

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 30, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

HemodynamicsMedical Informatics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay

    From time of the study subject admission to the unit until the day of discharge of that same study subject from the unit, assessed up to 12 months.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Mortality

    From date of randomization of the study subject until the date of ICU discharge, an average of 6.7 days..

Study Arms (1)

visible HII - patient assessment

EXPERIMENTAL

Clinical team from study unit will observe the Hemodynamic Instability Index created by the HIRBA 2.0 system for individual subjects randomized into HII group arm. If the HII value will cross the threshold, indicative of hemodynamic deterioration, subject from the study arm will receive intervention: clinical assessment.

Other: patient assessment

Interventions

Patient clinician status assessment based on Hemodynamic Instability Indicator (HII) trend. The HII indicator combines existing data such as physiologic parameters (Heart Rate, HR; Blood Pressure, BP), laboratory measurements (Albumin; Hematocrit, HCT; Bicarbonate; White Blood Cell, WBC; Blood Urea Nitrogen, BUN), and ADT information (age). HII will be displayed on charting workstation (Workstation on Wheels, WOW). Nurse's role will be to observe the value of HII while accessing WOW desktop (during regular charting), interpret HII value, and share this information to the physician when indicative of potential patient hemodynamic instability to trigger patient clinical status assessment. This intervention is associated with Experimental Study Arm: visible HII.

visible HII - patient assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients admitted to the study unit will be invited to participate in the study.
  • Study subject has to stay in study unit for at least 12 hours.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who were discharged from study unit earlier then 12 hours after admission.
  • Patients who are or become dependent on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Acute and Critical Care Surgery

St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093, United States

Location

Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit

Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shock

Interventions

Patient Outcome Assessment

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Outcome Assessment, Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Limitations and Caveats

Slow recruitment led to early termination of the study; generalizability to other ICU settings; lack of further analyses due to small sample size and data collected (timing of intervention, morbidity, cost reduction).

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Szymon Bieganski
Organization
Philips Healthcare

Study Officials

  • Grant V Bochicchio, MD

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mitchell M Levy, MD

    Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence RI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2014

First Posted

July 9, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion

November 18, 2016

Study Completion

November 18, 2016

Last Updated

June 11, 2019

Results First Posted

May 7, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Locations