Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Versus Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) as Bridge to Liver Transplant
SBRTvsTACE
A Randomized Phase II Study of Individualized Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Versus Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) With DEBDOX Beads as a Bridge to Transplant in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a bridging strategy for patients with HCC undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. We propose that SBRT will be associated with longer time intervals between initial treatment and the need for retreatment, compared to TACE, as a "bridge" to orthotopic liver transplantation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 5, 2024
CompletedMarch 5, 2024
February 1, 2024
7.3 years
June 23, 2014
September 5, 2023
February 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Freedom From Progression Over Time
Time from SBRT and TACE intervention to progression was tracked for subject receiving protocol intervention. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesion.
3, 6 and 12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Toxicity To Compare Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE
At each treatment, 2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment
Number of Participants Who Require Further Interventions Prior to Liver Transplant
2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment
Pathologic Response of Treated Lesion(s)
At time of liver transplant
Radiologic Response of Treat Lesion(s)
Baseline, 3 months post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment, every 3 months thereafter until 2 years post treatment
Quality of Life - Questionnaires Include PIQ-6 and SF-36v2 Health Survey
Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment
Study Arms (2)
Arm A
OTHERStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Arm B
OTHERTrans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Drug: Doxorubin
Interventions
SBRT will be delivered in five total fractions, with at a minimum of one day between any two treatments. The entire treatment must be delivered within 15 total days.
First day will be administered and a second TACE will be administered after 4 weeks and subsequently if imaging is showing disease progression. Following each TACE procedure all patients will remain in hospital for observation.
This procedure will be completed with 2 vials of drug eluting beads each loaded with 50 mg of Doxorubin.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are eligible for this trial.
- Hepatocellular carcinoma is defined as having at least one of the following:
- Biopsy proven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); or A discrete hepatic tumor(s) as defined by the Barcelona (29) criteria for cirrhotic patients, \>2cm with arterial hypervascularity and venous or delayed phase washout on CT or MRI.
- Patient is within Milan Criteria and "listed" for orthotopic liver transplantation.
- Patients must have a Zubrod performance status of ≤2.
- Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
- Patients must be 18 years of age or older. Adult patients of all ages, both sexes and all races will be included in this study.
- Patients must be Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Class A or Class B (≤ 7).
- Female patients within reproductive years may not be, nor become, pregnant during participation in this study. Both male and female patients within reproductive years must agree to use an effective contraceptive method during treatment. Women of childbearing age will be required to undergo a urine or serum pregnancy test to ensure they are not pregnant.
- Patients must have adequate organ function within 2 weeks of enrollment. Bone marrow: Platelets ≥30,000/mm3 Renal: BUN ≤40 mg/dl; creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dl Hepatic: INR ≤ 1.5 or correctable by Vitamin K, unless anti- coagulated for another medical reason Bilirubin \< 3 mg/dl (in the absence of obstruction or pre-existing disease of the biliary tract, e.g. primary sclerosing cholangitis) Patients uninvolved liver volume will be estimated and must be \> 700ml.
- Patients must sign an informed consent form approved for this purpose by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Lahey Hospital and Medical Center indicating that they are aware of the investigational aspects of the treatment and the potential risks.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in a "special category" designated the Public Health Service, including patients younger than 18, pregnant women, and prisoners.
- Refractory ascites or ascites that requires paracentesis for management.
- Patients with a solitary lesion greater than 5.0cm in size or more than 2 discrete lesions the largest greater than 3.0 cm in size.
- Known allergy to intravenous iodinated contrast agents unresponsive to prednisone pre-treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lahey Cliniclead
- Varian Medical Systemscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
One primary limitation was the small, single institution, randomized phase II design. Given the small overall numbers, no definitive judgements can be made. Another potential weakness of the trial was the selection of our primary endpoint. Our primary endpoint was time to residual or progressive cancer in the previously treated lesion(s). A third limitation of this trial was incomplete compliance with QOL questionnaires. Lastly, our QOL measures were performed over a long interval.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julia Roache
- Organization
- Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francis W Nugent, MD
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2014
First Posted
July 8, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 5, 2024
Results First Posted
March 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share