NCT02182687

Brief Summary

This study will compare stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a bridging strategy for patients with HCC undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. We propose that SBRT will be associated with longer time intervals between initial treatment and the need for retreatment, compared to TACE, as a "bridge" to orthotopic liver transplantation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2014

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2014

Completed
7.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2021

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 5, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 5, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

June 23, 2014

Results QC Date

September 5, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Orthotopic liver transplantBridge to transplantstereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Freedom From Progression Over Time

    Time from SBRT and TACE intervention to progression was tracked for subject receiving protocol intervention. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesion.

    3, 6 and 12 Months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Toxicity To Compare Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE

    At each treatment, 2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

  • Number of Participants Who Require Further Interventions Prior to Liver Transplant

    2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

  • Pathologic Response of Treated Lesion(s)

    At time of liver transplant

  • Radiologic Response of Treat Lesion(s)

    Baseline, 3 months post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment, every 3 months thereafter until 2 years post treatment

  • Quality of Life - Questionnaires Include PIQ-6 and SF-36v2 Health Survey

    Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment

Study Arms (2)

Arm A

OTHER

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Arm B

OTHER

Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Drug: Doxorubin

Procedure: Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)Drug: Doxorubin

Interventions

SBRT will be delivered in five total fractions, with at a minimum of one day between any two treatments. The entire treatment must be delivered within 15 total days.

Also known as: Radiation Therapy
Arm A

First day will be administered and a second TACE will be administered after 4 weeks and subsequently if imaging is showing disease progression. Following each TACE procedure all patients will remain in hospital for observation.

Also known as: Chemoembolization
Arm B

This procedure will be completed with 2 vials of drug eluting beads each loaded with 50 mg of Doxorubin.

Also known as: Doxorubin bead therapy
Arm B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are eligible for this trial.
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma is defined as having at least one of the following:
  • Biopsy proven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); or A discrete hepatic tumor(s) as defined by the Barcelona (29) criteria for cirrhotic patients, \>2cm with arterial hypervascularity and venous or delayed phase washout on CT or MRI.
  • Patient is within Milan Criteria and "listed" for orthotopic liver transplantation.
  • Patients must have a Zubrod performance status of ≤2.
  • Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
  • Patients must be 18 years of age or older. Adult patients of all ages, both sexes and all races will be included in this study.
  • Patients must be Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Class A or Class B (≤ 7).
  • Female patients within reproductive years may not be, nor become, pregnant during participation in this study. Both male and female patients within reproductive years must agree to use an effective contraceptive method during treatment. Women of childbearing age will be required to undergo a urine or serum pregnancy test to ensure they are not pregnant.
  • Patients must have adequate organ function within 2 weeks of enrollment. Bone marrow: Platelets ≥30,000/mm3 Renal: BUN ≤40 mg/dl; creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dl Hepatic: INR ≤ 1.5 or correctable by Vitamin K, unless anti- coagulated for another medical reason Bilirubin \< 3 mg/dl (in the absence of obstruction or pre-existing disease of the biliary tract, e.g. primary sclerosing cholangitis) Patients uninvolved liver volume will be estimated and must be \> 700ml.
  • Patients must sign an informed consent form approved for this purpose by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Lahey Hospital and Medical Center indicating that they are aware of the investigational aspects of the treatment and the potential risks.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients in a "special category" designated the Public Health Service, including patients younger than 18, pregnant women, and prisoners.
  • Refractory ascites or ascites that requires paracentesis for management.
  • Patients with a solitary lesion greater than 5.0cm in size or more than 2 discrete lesions the largest greater than 3.0 cm in size.
  • Known allergy to intravenous iodinated contrast agents unresponsive to prednisone pre-treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Interventions

RadiosurgeryRadiotherapyChemoembolization, TherapeuticDoxorubicin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsStereotaxic TechniquesNeurosurgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeInvestigative TechniquesEmbolization, TherapeuticHemostatic TechniquesTherapeutic OcclusionDaunorubicinAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPolycyclic CompoundsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydrates

Limitations and Caveats

One primary limitation was the small, single institution, randomized phase II design. Given the small overall numbers, no definitive judgements can be made. Another potential weakness of the trial was the selection of our primary endpoint. Our primary endpoint was time to residual or progressive cancer in the previously treated lesion(s). A third limitation of this trial was incomplete compliance with QOL questionnaires. Lastly, our QOL measures were performed over a long interval.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Julia Roache
Organization
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Francis W Nugent, MD

    Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2014

First Posted

July 8, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2021

Study Completion

October 1, 2021

Last Updated

March 5, 2024

Results First Posted

March 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations