Comparison of Never Performing Episiotomy to Performing it in a Selective Manor
EPISIO
Not Performing Episiotomy Versus Selective Episiotomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
237
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study hypothesis is that not performing never episiotomies is safe and results are equivalent to performing episiotomies ina selective manor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jul 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 17, 2016
November 1, 2016
2 months
June 16, 2014
November 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
duration of the second stage of labor
Time in minutes from beginning of second stage of labor until the delivery of the baby
From beginning of second stage of labor to delivery of the baby
frequency of episiotomy
Frequency of episiotomies in fact carried out
From diagnosis of second stage of labor to delivery of the neonate
frequency of spontaneous lacerations
Frequency of spontaneous lacerations verified immediatly after delivery (time frame from randomization until one hour after delivery)
From randomizatyion to one hour after delivery
blood loss at delivery
Volume of blood loss in mililiters, lost by the patient from the genital tract, from the moment of the delivery to one hour after delivery
from delivery to one hour postpartum
perineal need of suturing
Perineal suturing carried out by the birth attendant
From delivery to one hour postpartum
Apgar scores
one and five minutes Apgar scores
From delivery to five minutes after delivery
need for neonatal resuscitation
Need of any resuscitation procedures carried out in the conduction of the neonate, from the time of birth until one hour after delivery
From delivery to one hour after delivery
cord blood pH at birth
Cord blood pH ( hydrogen ion concentration) at birth collected just after delivery
From birth of the baby until first minute after delivery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
frequency of severe perineal trauma
from delivery of the baby until one hour after delivery
complications of perineal suture
From delivery until 15 days after delivery
perineal pain after childbirth
From 24 hours after delivery until 48 hours of the delivery
admission of the newborn (NB) in the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU).
from delivery until 28 days after birth
Study Arms (2)
Never perform episiotomy
EXPERIMENTALIn this group the birth attendant will sought to avoid the use of episiotomy, and try not to carry out the procedure unless considered absolutely needed
Selective episiotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be subjected to the usual routine (selective episiotomy, ie, in the presence of indications described in the literature, according to the discretion of the physician or nurse assisting the birth)
Interventions
In this group birth attendants will be sought to avoid at all cost episiotomy. The intention is to never perform episiotomy in this group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women in active labor admitted to the maternity ward
- Term pregnancy (37-42 weeks gestation);
- Maximum Dilation 8cm;
- Live fetus in vertex position.
You may not qualify if:
- hemorrhagic syndromes of pregnancy (premature separation of the normally implanted placenta
- Women with an indication for cesarean section: cephalopelvic disproportion (DCP), non reassuring fetal heart rate, dystocia;
- Women without capacity to consent and without legal guardians.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IMIP
Recife, Pernambuco, 50070-550, Brazil
Related Publications (2)
M Amorim M, Coutinho IC, Melo I, Katz L. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0315-4.
PMID: 28438209DERIVEDMelo I, Katz L, Coutinho I, Amorim MM. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Health. 2014 Aug 14;11:66. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-66.
PMID: 25124938DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Inês Melo, MS
IMIP
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2014
First Posted
June 30, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11