NCT02178111

Brief Summary

The study hypothesis is that not performing never episiotomies is safe and results are equivalent to performing episiotomies ina selective manor.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
237

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 16, 2014

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2014

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

November 17, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

June 16, 2014

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

episiotomy, vaginal delivery, randomized, perineum

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • duration of the second stage of labor

    Time in minutes from beginning of second stage of labor until the delivery of the baby

    From beginning of second stage of labor to delivery of the baby

  • frequency of episiotomy

    Frequency of episiotomies in fact carried out

    From diagnosis of second stage of labor to delivery of the neonate

  • frequency of spontaneous lacerations

    Frequency of spontaneous lacerations verified immediatly after delivery (time frame from randomization until one hour after delivery)

    From randomizatyion to one hour after delivery

  • blood loss at delivery

    Volume of blood loss in mililiters, lost by the patient from the genital tract, from the moment of the delivery to one hour after delivery

    from delivery to one hour postpartum

  • perineal need of suturing

    Perineal suturing carried out by the birth attendant

    From delivery to one hour postpartum

  • Apgar scores

    one and five minutes Apgar scores

    From delivery to five minutes after delivery

  • need for neonatal resuscitation

    Need of any resuscitation procedures carried out in the conduction of the neonate, from the time of birth until one hour after delivery

    From delivery to one hour after delivery

  • cord blood pH at birth

    Cord blood pH ( hydrogen ion concentration) at birth collected just after delivery

    From birth of the baby until first minute after delivery

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • frequency of severe perineal trauma

    from delivery of the baby until one hour after delivery

  • complications of perineal suture

    From delivery until 15 days after delivery

  • perineal pain after childbirth

    From 24 hours after delivery until 48 hours of the delivery

  • admission of the newborn (NB) in the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU).

    from delivery until 28 days after birth

Study Arms (2)

Never perform episiotomy

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group the birth attendant will sought to avoid the use of episiotomy, and try not to carry out the procedure unless considered absolutely needed

Other: Never perform episiotomy

Selective episiotomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be subjected to the usual routine (selective episiotomy, ie, in the presence of indications described in the literature, according to the discretion of the physician or nurse assisting the birth)

Procedure: episiotomy

Interventions

In this group birth attendants will be sought to avoid at all cost episiotomy. The intention is to never perform episiotomy in this group.

Never perform episiotomy
episiotomyPROCEDURE
Selective episiotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women in active labor admitted to the maternity ward
  • Term pregnancy (37-42 weeks gestation);
  • Maximum Dilation 8cm;
  • Live fetus in vertex position.

You may not qualify if:

  • hemorrhagic syndromes of pregnancy (premature separation of the normally implanted placenta
  • Women with an indication for cesarean section: cephalopelvic disproportion (DCP), non reassuring fetal heart rate, dystocia;
  • Women without capacity to consent and without legal guardians.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IMIP

Recife, Pernambuco, 50070-550, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • M Amorim M, Coutinho IC, Melo I, Katz L. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0315-4.

  • Melo I, Katz L, Coutinho I, Amorim MM. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Health. 2014 Aug 14;11:66. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-66.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Episiotomy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Delivery, ObstetricObstetric Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Maria Inês Melo, MS

    IMIP

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2014

First Posted

June 30, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2014

Study Completion

September 1, 2014

Last Updated

November 17, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-11

Locations