Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 2 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(2/2)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph phase_4
1
25%
Ph not_applicable
2
50%
Ph phase_2
1
25%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

1

Mid Stage

1

Late Stage

Phase Distribution4 total trials
Phase 2Efficacy & side effects
1(25.0%)
Phase 4Post-market surveillance
1(25.0%)
N/ANon-phased studies
2(50.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Phase 4

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

2 of 2 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

4

all time

Status Distribution
Completed(2)
Other(2)

Detailed Status

unknown2
Completed2

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
4
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
Phase 4

Trials by Phase

Phase 21 (25.0%)
Phase 41 (25.0%)
N/A2 (50.0%)

Trials by Status

unknown250%
completed250%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 4 of 4
completednot_applicable

Prediction of Perineal Tears by Striae Gravidarum Score

NCT02717676
unknownnot_applicable

Simple Continuous, Subcuticular and Interrupted Skin Suturing of Episiotomy and 2nd-degree Perineal Tears

NCT03611452
completedphase_4

Comparison of Never Performing Episiotomy to Performing it in a Selective Manor

NCT02178111
unknownphase_2

Comparison of Incision Angle of Mediolateral Episiotomy at 40 and 60 Degrees

NCT01930721

Clinical Trials (4)

Showing 4 of 4 trials
NCT02717676Not Applicable

Prediction of Perineal Tears by Striae Gravidarum Score

Completed
NCT03611452Not Applicable

Simple Continuous, Subcuticular and Interrupted Skin Suturing of Episiotomy and 2nd-degree Perineal Tears

Unknown
NCT02178111Phase 4

Comparison of Never Performing Episiotomy to Performing it in a Selective Manor

Completed
NCT01930721Phase 2

Comparison of Incision Angle of Mediolateral Episiotomy at 40 and 60 Degrees

Unknown

All 4 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
4