Efficacy Study of Light Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Parkinson's Disease
Sixty Minute Exposure of Specific Bandwidth Light for the Treatment of Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
92
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
Light treatment was originally employed in Parkinson's disease (PD) to determine if it might be effective in treating co-existing symptoms of depression and insomnia. However, a preliminary double-blind study as well as other studies reported significant improvement in both motor and co-existing Parkinsonian symptoms. As of yet, no long term double blind study has validated these findings. This study will use a double-blind design to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a non-invasive light therapy device to be used with ongoing pharmacotherapy for PD, over a six month treatment period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jun 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable parkinson-disease
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 23, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 23, 2018
CompletedOctober 23, 2018
October 1, 2018
2.3 years
June 24, 2014
July 23, 2018
October 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the Combined Scores (Sum) of Parts I, II, and III of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (M (MDS-UPDRS) From Baseline to Endpoint at 6 Months.
Part I: Non-motor impact of experiences of daily living. Part I has 13 questions,the first 6 are assessed by the examiner, and the remaining 7 are usually self assessed, but may include the patient's caregiver. Each question = 0-4, range= 0 - 65. Part II: Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living: This portion of the scale assesses the motor impact of PD on patients' experiences of daily living. There are 13 questions which are a component of the self-administered Patient Questionnaire.Each question = 0-4, range = 0-65. Part III: Motor Examination: This portion of the scale assesses the motor signs of PD and is administered by the evaluator. There are 18 questions, however several questions have multiple parts which are also scored. Each question 0-4, Total range=0-132. Higher score=more severe
Six Months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in the Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) From Baseline to Endpoint at 6 Months.
Six months
Change in the Score of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 From Baseline to Endpoint at 6 Months
Six months
Change in the Score of the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Disturbed Sleep, From Baseline to Endpoint at 6 Months.
Six months
Change in the Score of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale From Baseline to Endpoint at 6 Months.
Six months
Study Arms (2)
Spectramax light therapy device
ACTIVE COMPARATORLight therapy device which emits a specific bandwidth combination and intensity of light.
Control light device
SHAM COMPARATORLight therapy device, identical in appearance and operation to the Spectramax device, except that it produces a different bandwidth and intensity, which is not believed to produce a therapeutic response.
Interventions
Spectramax light therapy device emits a specific combination of bandwidths and intensities of light.
The control light device is identical in appearance to the Spectramax light therapy device, except that when turned on, emits a different combination of bandwidths and intensity, not believed to produce a therapeutic response.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females, with Stage II - III, idiopathic Parkinson's disease, as assessed by Hoehn-Yahr Scale
- \. On an optimized, stable dopamine replacement therapy for at least 1 month
You may not qualify if:
- \. Participants younger than 45 years old
- \. Participation in a study of investigational or marketed drugs or devices during the 30-day period prior to the prospective subject's Baseline Evaluation or during their involvement in this investigation
- \. Subjects who are medically complicated, medically unstable and/or have other severe co-morbid disease states, as determined by the Investigator.
- \. History of psychiatric illness that would preclude compliance with the protocol and/or ability to complete the study safely
- \. History or current diagnosis of major psychiatric disorder including Bipolar I Disorder that could interfere with accurate assessment and effective treatment
- \. Have a Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score of greater than or equal to 14
- \. An anticipated need for a change in dopamine replacement therapy during the subject's involvement in the investigation
- \. Patients on stable anti-depressant dose for less than 6 weeks
- \. Less than one month since stopping an anti-depressant or psychoactive medication
- \. History of current or recent (within previous 12 months) alcohol, narcotic or other drug abuse by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria
- \. Active suicidal or homicidal ideation or plan as determined by the Investigator or have a score of greater than or equal to 2 on the DBDI-II.
- \. Previous use of light therapy treatment
- \. Females of childbearing potential, i.e. capable of becoming pregnant
- \. Night shift work within the past 6 months or planned during the investigation
- \. Have planned travel of more than two weeks outside of two time zones from home during involvement in the Investigation
- +24 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Aspen Clinical Research
Orem, Utah, 84058, United States
VU University Medical Center (VUmc)
Amsterdam, MB, 1007, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Wyman BT, Adams D, Hendrix S, Groves J, Croft W, Ellison N, Olanow CW, Kieburtz K. A double-blind, controlled trial of circadian effective light therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Oct;22(6):e00728. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00728. Epub 2025 Sep 2.
PMID: 40903343DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dan Adams
- Organization
- PhotoPharmics, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dan Adams
PhotoPharmics, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2014
First Posted
June 26, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 23, 2016
Last Updated
October 23, 2018
Results First Posted
October 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10