Study Stopped
Lack of enrollment
Lisdexamfetamine's Effect In ADHD in the Brain and Cognition
LEIA
Effects of Lisdexamfetamine on Cognitive Control and Reward Response in Adolescents and Young Adults With ADHD: Neural and Clinical Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of lisdexamfetamine (LDX) on the neural and behavioral subcomponents of self-control, that is cognitive control and reward functioning, in adolescents and young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The investigators hypothesize that LDX is associated with 1a) decreased task-independent locus coeruleus (LC) activity; 1b) increased task-related activity in LC and the cognitive control network; 2) increased LC connectivity with the cognitive control network and 3) improved task performance and self-control. The investigators will test their hypotheses on fMRI data with linear contrasts of voxel-wise maps of parameter estimates (in both univariate and connectivity analyses). The investigators will also assess change in brain activity with the LDX in the LC and ventral tegmental areas (VTA) as we hypothesize that they are altered in ADHD and related to cognitive control and self-control dysfunction in ADHD. The investigators will use a repeated-measures, between-subject design to compare the effects of oral once daily LDX in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial (RCT) on neural (fMRI) and behavioral correlates of cognitive control via a working memory and a reward - delay discounting task in adolescents and young adults. A new condition has been added which will use a within-subject comparison, cross-over design between a single dose of LDX versus a single dose of placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 26, 2019
CompletedDecember 26, 2019
December 1, 2019
1.3 years
June 11, 2014
June 28, 2018
December 10, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Working Memory
Working memory performance, as measured by the percent of items correct on the Span Working Memory Task.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Delay Discounting
Level of self-control, as demonstrated on the Delay Discounting Task.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants may be randomized into the placebo comparator arm. Participants in this group will be given a sugar pill titrated up to 70 mg daily over the course of 9 weeks. Drug: Placebo
Lisdexamfetamine
EXPERIMENTALParticipants may be randomized into the experimental arm. Participants in this arm will be given lisdexamfetamine titrated up to 70 mg daily over the course of 9 weeks. Drug: Lisdexamfetamine
Interventions
Participants will be given either the study drug or placebo in tablet form. All participants will start with a 20 mg dose and will be titrated up to a 70 mg daily dose over 9 weeks. Participants between 12-18 years of age will be titrated in 10 mg increments and participants between 18-25 years of age in 10-20 mg increments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is a male or female adolescent or young adult, between the ages of 12 and 30 (inclusive) at the time of the initial signing of the informed consent/assent
- The subject meets DSM Fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder, Combined-Type. Diagnostic Interviews and Rating Scales will be used to inform about DSM criteria. Participants with 4 or 5 hyperactive/impulsive symptoms may be included at the investigator's discretion.
- This includes a history of childhood symptoms of ADHD for the adult subjects
- The subject, a caregiver, and the investigator must all agree that the present ADHD symptoms cause impairment in the subject's normal routines, which include academic achievement, occupational functioning, social activities, and/or relationships
- Females of childbearing potential (defined by menarche and not having undergone surgical sterilization/hysterectomy) must have a negative pregnancy test, must be practicing acceptable methods of contraception (or can confirm abstinence at each scheduled visit), and must not be pregnant or lactating at any point while they are participating in the study.
- Written informed consent must be obtained from a legally acceptable representative (e.g. guardian or caregiver for minors), in accordance with requirements of the Institutional Review Board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any protocol-required procedures. In addition, the subject, as required by the IRB, must provide informed assent at screening and as such must be able to understand that he or she can withdraw from the time at any time.
- The subject and the designated guardian(s) or caregiver(s)\[If minors\] are able to comprehend and satisfactorily comply with the protocol requirements, as evaluated by the investigator
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical contraindications
- History of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder, specific or focal neurological disorder
- Current academic learning disorder(s)
- Abnormal cardiac functioning with be excluded
- The subject experiences Adverse Events during the trial that would, in the investigator's judgment, preclude further exposure to LDX
- The subject had protocol violations during the trial considered major in the judgment of the investigator (significant noncompliance, use of prohibited concomitant medications, concern with use of drugs of abuse, etc.), which would deem them poor candidates for this trial
- Sexually active males who will not commit to utilizing an approved birth control methods or who will not remain abstinent during the trial and for 90 days following the last dose of study drug. Sexually active females of childbearing potential who will not commit to utilizing 1 of the approved birth control methods or who will not remain abstinent during the trial and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug. Abstinence will be permitted if it is confirmed and documented at every trial visit. If employing birth control, 1 of the following precautions must be used: vasectomy, tubal ligation, vaginal diaphragm, intrauterine device, birth control pill, birth control depot injections, implant, condom or sponge with spermicide.
- Subjects with an inability to swallow tablets or tolerate oral medication
- It is in the investigator's opinion that it is not in the subject's best interest to continue
- Contraindication for MRI scanning (e.g., metal implants, pacemakers, metal foreign bodies, pregnancy)
- Beast-feeding (if applicable)
- \. Females who are breast-feeding and/or who have a positive pregnancy test result prior to receiving trial drug
- Excluded medications
- Agents that lower blood levels of amphetamines: urinary acidifying agents (e.g. ammonium chloride, sodium acid phosphate, etc.); Methenamine Therapy.
- Agents that increase blood levels of amphetamines: urinary alkalinizing agents (e.g. Acetazolamide, some Thiazides).
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Davislead
- Shirecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UC Davis MIND Institute
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Data were not analyzed due to early study termination. Unable to recruit a sufficient number of subjects. Data on this measure is highly variable and low subject numbers will not produce reliable or valid data.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julie B Schweitzer
- Organization
- UC Davis
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julie B Schweitzer, PhD
University of California, Davis
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2014
First Posted
June 23, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 26, 2019
Results First Posted
December 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share