Barriers for the Uptake of LaparoScopic Hysterectomy
LIgHT
What Would it Take to Reduce the Proportion of Women Who Have a Hysterectomy Via an Open Abdominal Approach in Australia?
1 other identifier
observational
1,200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus) is the most common major gynaecological operation in women in developed countries. In Queensland, 6000 women require a hysterectomy for irregular periods, benign tumours or pelvic pain every year. Surgical approaches to surgical removal of the uterus (womb) include Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (LH), Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH) and Abdominal Hysterectomy through an abdominal incision (AH). It is widely accepted that LH and VH are less invasive surgical procedures, cause less bleeding, surgical complications and pain and are associated with quicker recovery from surgery than the more invasive AH. In a clinical trial comparing LH and AH we recently demonstrated that LH outperforms AH with regards to cost effectiveness causing less total health-services cost than AH. Implementation of LH in Queensland could save $9.8 million every year. Despite the evidence for LH and VH, 2600 hysterectomies (43%) are still performed through an open, abdominal incision. In brief, a common but outdated operation is still performed regularly causing not only unnecessary pain, surgical adverse events and longer hospital stay but also increased healthcare costs. This study will assess reasons why a significant number of gynaecologists and patients prefer AH over LH (Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy). We will survey specialist gynaecologists as well as patients who have had a hysterectomy for different health reasons. Based on the information from the survey the investigators will develop an intervention to increase the rate of laparoscopic hysterectomies in Queensland and pilot test it.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMarch 20, 2019
March 1, 2019
2 years
April 16, 2014
March 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Questionnaire will identify barriers
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Consumers
Women who have had a Hysterectomy in the previous 2 years
Doctors
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Eligibility Criteria
Members of RANZCOG community sample
You may qualify if:
- Obstetricians and Gynaecologists or Women who have had a hysterectomy in the previous 2 years
You may not qualify if:
- Women who have had a hysterectomy more than 2 years ago
- Women who had a hysterectomy for cancerous conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Queensland
Brisbane, Queensland, 4029, Australia
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Andreas Obermair
Queensland Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2014
First Posted
June 19, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share