Evaluation of Groin Lymphadenectomy Extent For Metastatic Melanoma
EAGLE FM
Inguinal or Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma to Groin Lymph Nodes and no Evidence of Pelvic Disease on PET/CT Scan - A Randomised Phase III Trial (EAGLE FM)
1 other identifier
interventional
634
6 countries
17
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: Spread of metastatic melanoma to the groin lymph nodes (LN) is a common event affecting about 350 people a year in Australia. Globally it has been shown that patients with involved groin LN, without proven pelvic LN disease on imaging receive 1 of 3 management strategies in equal proportions - inguinal lymphadenectomy (IL); ilio-inguinal lymphadenectomy (I-IL); or variable use of either depending on circumstances. Different experts have strong and polarised opinions favouring either IL or more extensive I-IL with existing cases series reporting conflicting data on best cancer outcomes. No high level evidence proves which operation is best. HYPOTHESIS: There will be no significant difference in DFS between patients having IL or I-IL, conditional on PET/CT scan showing no evidence of pelvic disease at the time of diagnosis of groin LN metastatic melanoma. AIMS: To provide a rational evidence base for management for melanoma to the groin LNs by randomly assessing the effect of each operation on DFS, distant DFS, overall survival (OS), morbidity - including early complications and longer-term rates of lymphedema as well as comprehensively assessed QOL. Also to clarify the reliability of PET/CT scans for staging pelvic LNs and evaluate any health economic benefits of I-IL over IL. TARGET POPULATION: To recruit 634 patients in 5 years. DESIGN: An Australian led, international, multi-centre, non-inferiority, phase III, prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing IL or I-IL for patients with metastatic melanoma to groin LNs and no evidence of pelvic disease on PET/CT. ENDPOINTS: DFS, Distant DFS, OS and QOL at 5 years. Accuracy of PET/CT for pelvic LN metastases. OUTCOMES: International standardization of care, improved cancer outcomes, improved QOL for patients with groin metastatic melanoma. Proof of principle about extent of surgery when PET/CT is clear in adjacent LN areas, leading to clinical trials investigating management of other lymph node fields.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Mar 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 17, 2024
CompletedMay 9, 2025
April 1, 2022
9.6 years
June 15, 2014
May 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary endpoint of the study will be Disease Free Survival following lymphadenectomy, assessed after 60 months of follow-up.
The difference between IL and I-IL surgery in DFS 5 years after randomisation
60 Months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Overall Survival
0 - 120 months
Distant Disease Free Survival
0 - 120 Months
Regional Recurrence Free Survival
0 - 120 Months
Morbidity differences
Up to 120 days from lymphadenectomy, and from 0 - 120 months
Quality Of Life
0 - 120 Months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1: Inguinal Lymphadenectomy
OTHERInguinal Lymphadenectomy (IL) is removal of the easily accessible superficial groin lymph nodes (LNs) and has a median LN retrieval of 11 lymph nodes
Arm 2: Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy
OTHERIlio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy (I-IL) is the removal of the same superficial groin lymp nodes (LN) removed during an IL but also combined with the more surgically complex removal of the ipsilateral pelvic LN. About twice as many LN are removed with I-IL compared to IL.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients may be included in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:
- Must be 15 and above.
- Have primary cutaneous melanoma or if the patient presents with stage III melanoma with no known primary tumour then a thorough search for the primary should be documented (including perineal and perianal areas)
- Life expectancy of at least 10 years from the time of diagnosis, not considering the melanoma in question, as determined by the PI
- Must have one or multiple inguinal node(s) involved, histologically or cytologically proven as metastatic melanoma. This can can be detected:
- At the time of diagnosis;
- Or by Ultrasound detection;
- Or later after relapse when no Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) was performed at the time of primary tumour management;
- Or as a result of SNB;
- Or at the time of regional recurrence after "false negative" SNB;
- Absent distant disease clinically and on PET/CT scan. (Patients must have NO further distant disease or visceral metastases)
- ECOG performance status must be between 0 to 2 at randomisation
- Whole body PET/CT scan, specifically stating there is NO evidence of pelvic lymph node involvement prior to randomisation and a CT Brain or MRI Brain scan. Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation.
- Able to provide written, informed consent
- Willing to return to the centre for follow up examinations and procedures, as outlined in the protocol.
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Distant metastatic disease on clinical examination or staging imaging (CT/MRI brain or whole body PET/CT scan). Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation
- Pelvic LN involvement on SNB or PET/CT scan suggestive of metastatic disease in the pelvis - criteria for diagnosis include normal size or enlarged lymph nodes (\> 1 cm) with increased FDG activity on PET (SUV \>3). If there are enlarged, necrotic lymph nodes FDG activity on PET is not required to be present. If unsure central review should be sought.
- Bilateral inguinal lymph node involvement
- Patients with a history of major pelvic surgery and / or regional radiotherapy at any time in the past
- Requiring planned radiotherapy following surgery due to macroscopic, bulky and matted nodes.
- Unfit for General Anaesthesia
- Melanoma-related operative procedures not corresponding to criteria described in the protocol
- Patients with prior cancers, except:
- those with a thin \<=1 mm, regionally unrelated melanoma \> 5 years ago
- those with a good prognosis regionally unrelated cancer (\>90% probability of 10 years disease specific survival)
- other cancers diagnosed more than five years ago with no evidence of disease recurrence within this time
- successfully treated basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma
- carcinoma in-situ of the cervix
- episode of in transit melanoma \> 3 years ago
- A medical or psychiatric condition that compromises ability to give informed consent or complete the protocol
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials Limitedlead
- Cancer Council New South Walescollaborator
- Melanoma Institute Australiacollaborator
Study Sites (17)
Calvary Public Hospital Bruce
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2617, Australia
Melanoma Institute Australia - The Poche Centre
North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060, Australia
Sydney Adventist Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2076, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Mater Hospital Brisbane
Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400, Brazil
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01508-010, Brazil
Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV
Padua, Veneto, 35128, Italy
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713, Netherlands
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals
London, United Kingdom
St George's Hospital
London, United Kingdom
St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals
St Helens, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Mahumud RA, Law CK, Ospino DA, de Wilt JHW, van Leeuwen BL, Allan C, de Lima Vazquez V, Jones RP, Howle J, Peric B, Spillane AJ, Morton RL. Economic Evaluation of Inguinal Versus Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Patients with Stage III Metastatic Melanoma to Groin Lymph Nodes: Evidence from the EAGLE FM Randomized Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):4211-4222. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17040-2. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
PMID: 40016616DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Spillane
The University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2014
First Posted
June 18, 2014
Study Start
March 2, 2015
Primary Completion
October 17, 2024
Study Completion
October 17, 2024
Last Updated
May 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2022-04