NCT05887921

Brief Summary

The aim of the present study is to prospectively compare oncological and functional results of penile radical inguinal lymphadenectomy performed with an open versus videolaparoscopic technique. The main questions it aims to answer are: evaluated the oncological and functional results of inguinal lymphadenectomy performed with minimally invasive techniques using videolaparoscopic instruments vs open inguinal lymphadenectomy according to the standard technique. Participants will undergo treatment of the primary lesion and contextual inguinal lymphadenectomy:

  • Groin 1: open lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in traditional surgery
  • Groin 2: laparoscopic lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in minimally invasive surgery. The results of these procedures will be prospectively collected and compared.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2019

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 22, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 29, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 24, 2023

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 5, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 5, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

December 29, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 24, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Surgical outcomes of lymph drainage (ml)

    Stratification of complications according to the international classification of Clavien-Dindo.

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

Open inguinal Lymphadenectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

\- Groin 1: open lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in traditional surgery

Procedure: Inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Laparoscopic inguinal Lymphadenectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Groin 2: laparoscopic lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in minimally invasive surgery

Procedure: Inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Interventions

arm A: open lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in traditional surgery arm B: laparoscopic lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in minimally invasive surgery

Laparoscopic inguinal LymphadenectomyOpen inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsMale with a diagnosis of penile cancer
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age of patients \[45-80\], CCI ≤ 3. Penile tumour with inguinal lymphadenectomy indication, according to EAU 2019 guidelines. Written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age of patients\> 80, CCI ≥ 3. Patients with lymphatic disorders of lower limbs. Patients with previous inguinal surgery/radiotherapy. Previous or concomitant diagnosis of other tumours.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Turin, 10126, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Falcone M, Gul M, Peretti F, Preto M, Cirigliano L, Scavone M, Sedigh O, Oderda M, Gontero P. Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Cancer: An Interim Report from a Trial Comparing Open Versus Videoendoscopic Surgery Using a Within-patient Design. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Mar 21;63:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.007. eCollection 2024 May.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Penile NeoplasmsLymphatic Metastasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesPenile DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic ProcessesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Surgical, observational, prospective, monocentric study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2022

First Posted

June 5, 2023

Study Start

April 30, 2019

Primary Completion

December 22, 2022

Study Completion

May 24, 2023

Last Updated

June 5, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All the data are anonymous and cannot be reconducted to patients if the legend is not available. this legend is owned only by the principal investigator

Locations