NCT02165943

Brief Summary

This is a retrospective, two-arm study reviewing the healing of cavitary defects in patients treated with Vitoss alone versus those treated with Vitoss with bone marrow aspirate (BMA). There will be a prospective follow-up visit at 24+ months to evaluate lont-term healing in patients identified during the retrospective portion of the study. It is thought that the inclusion of BMA will facilitate the resorption of the graft material, leading to better long-term bone healing.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 30, 2014

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2014

Status Verified

June 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

May 30, 2014

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone as observed via CT

    Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.

    minimum of 24 months post-operatively

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Presence of graft within the soft tissue as observed by CT

    minimum of 24 months post-operatively

  • Presence of a rim of radiolucency surrounding the grafted defect as observed by CT

    minimum of 24 months post-operatively

  • Size of the defect as observed by CT

    minimum of 24 months post-operatively

  • Bone trabeculation through the defect as observed by CT

    minimum of 24 months post-operatively

  • Persistence of graft material through the lesion as observed by CT

    minimum of 24 months post-operatively

Study Arms (2)

Vitoss Bone Graft with BMA

Patients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage age was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft with BMA to fill the cavity.

Device: Vitoss

Vitoss bone graft

Patients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft to fill the cavity.

Device: Vitoss

Interventions

VitossDEVICE

Vitoss is a synthetic calcium-based bone void filler made of beta-tricalcium phosphate.

Vitoss Bone Graft with BMAVitoss bone graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients will be selected from retrospective records from the investigators specialty practice.

You may qualify if:

  • males and females \>/= 18 years of age at the time of surgery
  • Patients treated with Vitoss alone or Vitoss with added BMA between 2004 and 2012
  • willing and able to provide Informed Consent to participate in and follow study requirements (including a radiologic assessment)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a known post-traumatic defect
  • active infection at the time of implantation
  • history of bone marrow disorders
  • contraindications to the use of supplemental BMA

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Upstate Orthopedics, LLC

Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Bucholz RW, Carlton A, Holmes R. Interporous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Mar;(240):53-62.

    PMID: 2537166BACKGROUND
  • Itokazu M, Matsunaga T, Ishii M, Kusakabe H, Wyni Y. Use of arthroscopy and interporous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in tibial plateau fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115(1):45-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00453217.

    PMID: 8775710BACKGROUND
  • Itokazu M, Matsunaga T. Arthroscopic restoration of depressed tibial plateau fractures using bone and hydroxyapatite grafts. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(1):103-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80353-6.

    PMID: 8442816BACKGROUND
  • McAndrew MP, Gorman PW, Lange TA. Tricalcium phosphate as a bone graft substitute in trauma: preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma. 1988;2(4):333-9. doi: 10.1097/00005131-198802040-00011.

    PMID: 3074162BACKGROUND
  • Damron TA, Lisle J, Craig T, Wade M, Silbert W, Cohen H. Ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate alone or combined with bone marrow aspirate for benign cavitary lesions: comparison in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan 16;95(2):158-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00181.

    PMID: 23324964BACKGROUND
  • Eggli PS, Muller W, Schenk RK. Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Jul;(232):127-38.

    PMID: 2838207BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bone Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Timothy Damron, MD

    State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2014

First Posted

June 18, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

June 18, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-06

Locations