Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in SCI
2 other identifiers
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose. When the clinical trial finishes, it will be done a completed check of all obtained parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started May 2014
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 19, 2019
CompletedJuly 19, 2019
May 1, 2019
2 years
May 6, 2014
September 3, 2018
May 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score
Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scale
\- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment. Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Change in Barthel Score
\- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment. Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS Scale
-Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.
Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.
\- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Changes in ASHWORTH Score
\- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Changes in EVA Score
• Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy- Changes in Geffner Score
changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder
Changes in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy- Changes in NBD Score
changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)
Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.
Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor Pressure
Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)
Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliance
Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling . It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching. It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric Capacity
Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity
Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images
before (baseline visit) and at 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Adverse Events .
Up to 12 months
Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) Samples
Basal and 10 months after the administration
Study Arms (1)
Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
EXPERIMENTALAll patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Interventions
Diagnosed patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and chronically established SCI will be treated with Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cells.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Incomplete SCI
- Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
- Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
- The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- Thread Men and women will compromise to use anticonceptive issues from first cell´s extraction to 6 months after last cell´s administration.
- Ability to attend clinical follow-up and perform physical therapy through the treatment period.
- Written and signed informed consent, according to the local regulation.
- Hematologic and creatinin parameters, SGOT and SGPT, within the normal range, according to laboratory standards considering that small variations could be accepted based on clinical study team criteria.
You may not qualify if:
- A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
- Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
- Age below 18 years or above 70.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
- Patients with systemic disease that represents and additional risk to treatment.
- Patients with uncertain commitment to follow the physical therapy and clinical visits as well as patient with a negative input in the previous phycological assessment.
- Inability to assess the SCI features through MRI either noise due to spinal stabilization systems or any other cause.
- Patients currently under hematopoietic growth factors treatment or who required or maintained anticoagulation.
- Neurodegenerative disease additional.
- History of substance abuse, psychiatric disease or allergy to the protein products used in the process of cell expansion.
- Positive serology for HIV and syphilis.
- Active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C.
- With other reason that would consider the patient ineligible for cell therapy according to the investigators judgment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Vaquero J, Zurita M. Functional recovery after severe CNS trauma: current perspectives for cell therapy with bone marrow stromal cells. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
PMID: 21163325BACKGROUNDOtero L, Zurita M, Bonilla C, Aguayo C, Vela A, Rico MA, Vaquero J. Late transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow stromal cells improves neurologic deficits subsequent to intracerebral hemorrhage. Cytotherapy. 2011 May;13(5):562-71. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.544720. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
PMID: 21208021BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Vaquero Crespo
- Organization
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jesús JV Vaquero Crespo, M.D.
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2014
First Posted
June 18, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 19, 2019
Results First Posted
July 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Anonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical development plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication