NCT02165904

Brief Summary

The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose. When the clinical trial finishes, it will be done a completed check of all obtained parameters.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 6, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2014

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 19, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 6, 2014

Results QC Date

September 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 14, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Analyze clinical efficacy of subarachnoid administration ofautologous BMSC expanded "in vitro"

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score

    Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scale

    \- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment. Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy-Change in Barthel Score

    \- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment. Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS Scale

    -Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.

    Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

  • Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.

    \- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

  • Changes in ASHWORTH Score

    \- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy-Changes in EVA Score

    • Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy- Changes in Geffner Score

    changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder

    Changes in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

  • Efficacy- Changes in NBD Score

    changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)

    Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.

    Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor Pressure

    Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)

    Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up

  • Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliance

    Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling . It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching. It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.

    measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery

  • Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric Capacity

    Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity

    Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up

  • Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images

    before (baseline visit) and at 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Adverse Events .

    Up to 12 months

  • Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) Samples

    Basal and 10 months after the administration

Study Arms (1)

Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell

EXPERIMENTAL

All patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell

Biological: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell

Interventions

Diagnosed patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and chronically established SCI will be treated with Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cells.

Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Incomplete SCI
  • Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
  • Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
  • The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
  • Age between 18 and 70 years
  • Thread Men and women will compromise to use anticonceptive issues from first cell´s extraction to 6 months after last cell´s administration.
  • Ability to attend clinical follow-up and perform physical therapy through the treatment period.
  • Written and signed informed consent, according to the local regulation.
  • Hematologic and creatinin parameters, SGOT and SGPT, within the normal range, according to laboratory standards considering that small variations could be accepted based on clinical study team criteria.

You may not qualify if:

  • A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
  • Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
  • Age below 18 years or above 70.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
  • Patients with systemic disease that represents and additional risk to treatment.
  • Patients with uncertain commitment to follow the physical therapy and clinical visits as well as patient with a negative input in the previous phycological assessment.
  • Inability to assess the SCI features through MRI either noise due to spinal stabilization systems or any other cause.
  • Patients currently under hematopoietic growth factors treatment or who required or maintained anticoagulation.
  • Neurodegenerative disease additional.
  • History of substance abuse, psychiatric disease or allergy to the protein products used in the process of cell expansion.
  • Positive serology for HIV and syphilis.
  • Active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C.
  • With other reason that would consider the patient ineligible for cell therapy according to the investigators judgment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Puerta de Hierro

Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Vaquero J, Zurita M. Functional recovery after severe CNS trauma: current perspectives for cell therapy with bone marrow stromal cells. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

    PMID: 21163325BACKGROUND
  • Otero L, Zurita M, Bonilla C, Aguayo C, Vela A, Rico MA, Vaquero J. Late transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow stromal cells improves neurologic deficits subsequent to intracerebral hemorrhage. Cytotherapy. 2011 May;13(5):562-71. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.544720. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

    PMID: 21208021BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Vaquero Crespo
Organization
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid

Study Officials

  • Jesús JV Vaquero Crespo, M.D.

    Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2014

First Posted

June 18, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 19, 2019

Results First Posted

July 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical development plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication

Locations