NCT01909154

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm the security, and detect the effect of the local administration in damaged nervous tissue, of autologous bone marrow stromal cells.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2013

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2015

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 29, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 29, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

July 7, 2013

Results QC Date

September 27, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 28, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

neurophysiological parameters improvementspinal cord injurybiology therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Safety-Number of Adverse Events

    Clinical evaluation of possible adverse effects is performed daily at the first week after the first administration of stem cells and weekly until the 6 months follow-up visit and then at month 9 and 12. . * During the first stem cells administration (during surgery): Changes in vital signs (ECG, Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR) were evaluated * During the second stem cells administration: Changes in vital signs (BP, HR), headache and meningeal irritation were evaluated * During the first weeks, after the first and the second administrations, the possibility of meningeal irritation, headache and infectious complications were considerate. MedDRA stardards are followed

    Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Efficacy-Sensitivity Recovery Using ASIA Scale

    sensitivity before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

  • Efficacy-Changes in the Level of Chronic Pain Based on the IANR-SCIFRS Scale (Pain Section)

    Changes in the level of Chronic pain before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

  • Efficacy- Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters Measured as the Number of Patients With SSEPs (Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)

    Changes in the level neurophysiological parameters improvement (baseline visit) and 6, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

  • Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies in Terms of máximum Cystometric Capacity

    Urodynamic studies before surgery and 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

  • Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    changes in the spinal cord morphology on neuroimaging studies before surgery and 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)

Study Arms (1)

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Autologous bone marrow adult mesenchymal stem cells expanded in vitro. Administered by Intrathecal injection (subarachnoid and intramedullary). Depending on centromedullary post-traumatic injury: bone marrow stromal stem cells administration (MSCs) at the minimum dose of 100x106 followed by subarachnoid administration of 30x106 MSCs,3 months later

Biological: Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy

Interventions

Stem cells administration locally

Also known as: BMMSCs= Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female with ages between 18 years and 60 years with of age or older functional sequelae chronically established by traumatic injury of the spinal cord (spinal segments between the vertebral bodies C6 and L1) and considered irreversible (not respond to any other treatment). In this study, the lesion is considered chronically established, when there are no signs of functional recovery after a minimum follow-up period of 6 months after the spinal cord injury. The upper age limit is justified by the low potential of in vitro expansion of bone marrow stromal cells over 60 years.
  • Complete paraplegia, with loss of motor and sensory function below the lesion (grade A in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) Scale .
  • Spinal injury MRI morphologically visible, and without images that suggest spinal cord transection, with separation of the both ends of the spinal cord.
  • Tracking evolutionary possibility after treatment protocol and to comply physiotherapy maintained throughout the follow up period.
  • Written informed Consent according to good clinical practice (GCP) and local regulations, obtained before any study procedure.
  • Hematological parameters and creatinine, serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) in normal range according to laboratory standards, are accepted, however, small non-significant deviations according to the investigator.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Systemic disease represents an added risk to treatment
  • Patients with questions about their possible cooperation in rehabilitation-physiotherapy treatments later, or negative report psychological assessment prior.
  • Neuroimaging data showing spinal cord section with separation of the terminal portion of the spinal cord
  • Current neoplastic disease diagnosed or treated in the previous five years
  • Patients treated with hematopoietic growth factors or requiring stable anticoagulation
  • Added neurodegenerative disease
  • History of substance abuse, psychiatric illness or allergy to protein products used in the process of cell expansion
  • HIV positive serology and syphilis
  • Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C active According to the investigator's opinion if there are findings on physical examination, abnormal clinical test results or other medica relevant entries, social or psychosocial factors which might influence negatively the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Puerta de Hierro

Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Geffner LF, Santacruz P, Izurieta M, Flor L, Maldonado B, Auad AH, Montenegro X, Gonzalez R, Silva F. Administration of autologous bone marrow stem cells into spinal cord injury patients via multiple routes is safe and improves their quality of life: comprehensive case studies. Cell Transplant. 2008;17(12):1277-93. doi: 10.3727/096368908787648074.

    PMID: 19364066BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Vaquero Crespo
Organization
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid

Study Officials

  • Jesus JV Vaquero Crespo, Dr.

    Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor on neurosurgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2013

First Posted

July 26, 2013

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

March 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 29, 2019

Results First Posted

March 29, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

nonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical Development Plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication.

Locations