Safety Study of Local Administration of Autologous Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in Chronic Paraplegia
CME-LEM1
Phase I Pilot Study to Evaluate the Security of Local Administration of Autologous Stem Cells Obtained From the Bone Marrow Stroma, in Traumatic Injuries of the Spinal Cord
2 other identifiers
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to confirm the security, and detect the effect of the local administration in damaged nervous tissue, of autologous bone marrow stromal cells.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Mar 2013
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 29, 2019
CompletedMarch 29, 2019
March 1, 2019
1.1 years
July 7, 2013
September 27, 2016
March 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Safety-Number of Adverse Events
Clinical evaluation of possible adverse effects is performed daily at the first week after the first administration of stem cells and weekly until the 6 months follow-up visit and then at month 9 and 12. . * During the first stem cells administration (during surgery): Changes in vital signs (ECG, Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR) were evaluated * During the second stem cells administration: Changes in vital signs (BP, HR), headache and meningeal irritation were evaluated * During the first weeks, after the first and the second administrations, the possibility of meningeal irritation, headache and infectious complications were considerate. MedDRA stardards are followed
Up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Efficacy-Sensitivity Recovery Using ASIA Scale
sensitivity before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy-Changes in the Level of Chronic Pain Based on the IANR-SCIFRS Scale (Pain Section)
Changes in the level of Chronic pain before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy- Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters Measured as the Number of Patients With SSEPs (Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)
Changes in the level neurophysiological parameters improvement (baseline visit) and 6, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies in Terms of máximum Cystometric Capacity
Urodynamic studies before surgery and 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
changes in the spinal cord morphology on neuroimaging studies before surgery and 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Study Arms (1)
Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy
EXPERIMENTALAutologous bone marrow adult mesenchymal stem cells expanded in vitro. Administered by Intrathecal injection (subarachnoid and intramedullary). Depending on centromedullary post-traumatic injury: bone marrow stromal stem cells administration (MSCs) at the minimum dose of 100x106 followed by subarachnoid administration of 30x106 MSCs,3 months later
Interventions
Stem cells administration locally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female with ages between 18 years and 60 years with of age or older functional sequelae chronically established by traumatic injury of the spinal cord (spinal segments between the vertebral bodies C6 and L1) and considered irreversible (not respond to any other treatment). In this study, the lesion is considered chronically established, when there are no signs of functional recovery after a minimum follow-up period of 6 months after the spinal cord injury. The upper age limit is justified by the low potential of in vitro expansion of bone marrow stromal cells over 60 years.
- Complete paraplegia, with loss of motor and sensory function below the lesion (grade A in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) Scale .
- Spinal injury MRI morphologically visible, and without images that suggest spinal cord transection, with separation of the both ends of the spinal cord.
- Tracking evolutionary possibility after treatment protocol and to comply physiotherapy maintained throughout the follow up period.
- Written informed Consent according to good clinical practice (GCP) and local regulations, obtained before any study procedure.
- Hematological parameters and creatinine, serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) in normal range according to laboratory standards, are accepted, however, small non-significant deviations according to the investigator.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy and lactation
- Systemic disease represents an added risk to treatment
- Patients with questions about their possible cooperation in rehabilitation-physiotherapy treatments later, or negative report psychological assessment prior.
- Neuroimaging data showing spinal cord section with separation of the terminal portion of the spinal cord
- Current neoplastic disease diagnosed or treated in the previous five years
- Patients treated with hematopoietic growth factors or requiring stable anticoagulation
- Added neurodegenerative disease
- History of substance abuse, psychiatric illness or allergy to protein products used in the process of cell expansion
- HIV positive serology and syphilis
- Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C active According to the investigator's opinion if there are findings on physical examination, abnormal clinical test results or other medica relevant entries, social or psychosocial factors which might influence negatively the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Geffner LF, Santacruz P, Izurieta M, Flor L, Maldonado B, Auad AH, Montenegro X, Gonzalez R, Silva F. Administration of autologous bone marrow stem cells into spinal cord injury patients via multiple routes is safe and improves their quality of life: comprehensive case studies. Cell Transplant. 2008;17(12):1277-93. doi: 10.3727/096368908787648074.
PMID: 19364066BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Vaquero Crespo
- Organization
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jesus JV Vaquero Crespo, Dr.
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor on neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2013
First Posted
July 26, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 29, 2019
Results First Posted
March 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
nonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical Development Plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication.