NCT02163226

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if 1 large dose of radiation therapy is better at controlling pain from cancer that has spread to the bones than 10 smaller doses of radiation. Researchers also want to learn if 1 large dose of radiation therapy can help decrease the use of drugs to control the pain, and if it can help to control the disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
167

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 6, 2014

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 2, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 2, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 8, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.1 years

First QC Date

June 9, 2014

Results QC Date

August 20, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Bone metastasesHypofractionated Radiation TherapyStandard Radiation TherapyXRTPain controlPalliation of symptomsQuestionnaireSurvey

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Intent- to- Treat Patients With Pain Response by Treatment

    Evaluate single fraction stereotactic regimen for pain response in terms of time to failure. Pain response was defined by international consensus criteria as a combination of pain score and analgesic use (daily morphine-equivalent dose). Pain failure (ie, lack of response) was defined as worsening pain score (2 points on a 0-to-10 scale), an increase in morphine-equivalent opioid dose of 50% or more, reirradiation, or pathologic fracture. Time to failure was defined as the first occurrence of any of the following events: worsening in pain score by at least 2 categories by MDASI survey. Statistical tests in treatment group were based on the Wilcoxon rank sum test to compare changes in pain scores and analgesic use at each assessment point relative to baseline. Increases or decreases of 2 or more points on a scale of 0 to 10 indicated improving or worsening pain. Fisher exact tests were used to compare the distribution of pain responders (CR + PR) and nonresponders (PP + IR).

    From date of registration until the date of first documented Pain failure or death from any cause, or lost to follow up, whichever came first, assessed up to 9 months

  • Number of Evaluable Participants With Pain Response by Treatment

    Evaluate single fraction stereotactic regimen for pain response in terms of time to failure. Pain response was defined by international consensus criteria as a combination of pain score and analgesic use (daily morphine-equivalent dose). Pain failure (ie, lack of response) was defined as worsening pain score (2 points on a 0-to-10 scale), an increase in morphine-equivalent opioid dose of 50% or more, reirradiation, or pathologic fracture. Time to failure was defined as the first occurrence of any of the following events: worsening in pain score by at least 2 categories by MDASI survey. Complete response (CR) is a pain score of 0 at the treated site and no increase in analgesic. Partial response (PR): reduction in pain score of 2 or more points above baseline with no increase in analgesic. Pain progression (PP): Increases of 2 or more points on a scale of 0 to 10 or worsening pain. indeterminate response (IR): were all other responses.

    From date of registration until the date of first documented Pain failure or death from any cause, or lost to follow up, whichever came first, assessed up to 9 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Toxicity Associated With Treatment

    From date of registration until the date of documented death from any cause, or lost to follow up, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years.

Study Arms (2)

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive standard hypofractionated regimen of 3 Gy x 10 fractions, 1 radiation treatment a day for 5 days in a row. Questionnaire completion at months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 and then every 3 months after that for at least 3 years. Questionnaires ask about pain, pain relief, and quality of life.

Radiation: Hypofractionated Radiation TreatmentBehavioral: Questionnaire

One Radiation Therapy Treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

12 Gy x 1 fraction or 16 Gy x 1 fractions adaptively depending on the size of the metastases or gross tumor volume (GTV). Questionnaire completion at months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 and then every 3 months after that for at least 3 years. Questionnaires ask about pain, pain relief, and quality of life.

Radiation: One Radiation TreatmentBehavioral: Questionnaire

Interventions

Participants receive standard hypofractionated regimen of 3 Gy x 10 fractions, 1 radiation treatment a day for 5 days in a row.

Also known as: XRT
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy

12 Gy x 1 fraction or 16 Gy x 1 fractions adaptively depending on the size of the metastases or gross tumor volume (GTV).

Also known as: XRT
One Radiation Therapy Treatment
QuestionnaireBEHAVIORAL

Questionnaire completion at months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 and then every 3 months after that for at least 3 years. Questionnaires ask about pain, pain relief, and quality of life.

Also known as: Survey
Hypofractionated Radiation TherapyOne Radiation Therapy Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of malignancy
  • Patients with any radiographic evidence of bone metastases, including plain x-ray, bone scan, computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET) scan
  • Patients with pain or dysaesthesia
  • Patients with a life expectancy of more than 3 months
  • Patients able to complete pain assessment and quality of life surveys
  • Patients with multiple osseous sites are eligible; however should not treat more than 3 separate radiation treatment fields concurrently.
  • Patients with surgery for osseous metastases are allowed.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with prior radiation therapy to the treatment site
  • Patients with a current, untreated spinal cord compression
  • Patients with a radiographic or pathologic fracture to the treatment site
  • Patients with painful metastases to hands and feet that need to be radiated on protocol
  • Patients previously treated with radioactive isotope (e.g. Sr89) within 30 days of randomization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center

Gilbert, Arizona, 85234, United States

Location

MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043, United States

Location

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, Komaki R, Liao Z, Zacharia R, Szeto BK, Welsh JW, Hahn SM, Fuller CD, Moon BS, Bird JE, Satcher R, Lin PP, Jeter M, O'Reilly MS, Lewis VO. Single-Fraction Stereotactic vs Conventional Multifraction Radiotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients With Predominantly Nonspine Bone Metastases: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-878. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0192.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, MD,Associate Professor, Radiation Oncology Department
Organization
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

Study Officials

  • Quynh-nhu Nguyen, MD

    M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2014

First Posted

June 13, 2014

Study Start

August 6, 2014

Primary Completion

September 2, 2020

Study Completion

September 2, 2020

Last Updated

November 8, 2021

Results First Posted

November 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Locations