A Study on Improved Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion With Less Effective Radiation Dose in CT (SIMPLE CT)
Adenosine-induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Dual-source 128-slice CT: a Study on the Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Scanning Protocols
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Among the current myocardial CT perfusion techniques, dynamic CT perfusion technique is most advantageous in obtaining information on myocardial blood flow and volume. However, dynamic CT perfusion technique involves higher radiation dose than static CT techniques. Patients have to take a breath hold during 30 seconds with current dynamic CT perfusion protocol. If patients cannot hold their breath, anterior or inferior myocardium might be excluded due to limited scan coverage of a 128-slice dual-source CT scanner. Reduction of scanning duration of dynamic CT perfusion may not only reduce radiation exposure, but also make patients more comfortable. Therefore, the investigators intended to propose a modified scan protocol with shorter scan duration and compare diagnostic accuracy of a modified scan protocol with the current scan protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 6, 2017
March 1, 2014
1.9 years
March 31, 2014
December 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
AUC (area under the curve) of CT perfusion for detection of perfusion defects : 30-second scanning protocol versus 21-second scanning protocol
There were no significant differences in the diagnostic performances between two CTP protocols with different scan duration.
When all randomized patients underwent CT scanning (A total of 120 symptomatic patients will be randomized to dynamic CT perfusion protocols with 30-second or 21-second scan duration.)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Effective radiation dose for each component of the CT examination is calculated as the product of the dose-length product multiplied by a conversion coefficient of 0.014 (mSv/[mGycm]).
up to 1 week after each patient underwent CT scanning
Study Arms (2)
Myocardial CT perfusion (21-second)
EXPERIMENTALA total of 60 symptomatic patients will be randomized to dynamic CT perfusion protocol with 21-second scan duration.
Myocardial CT perfusion (30-second)
ACTIVE COMPARATORA total of 60 symptomatic patients will be randomized to dynamic CT perfusion protocol with 30-second scan duration.
Interventions
Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion using 128-slice dual-source CT
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women patients, with age ranging 30-80.
- Known or suspected coronary artery disease who are supposed to undergo invasive coronary angiography
- Patients who are willing to sign the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication of CT
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast media or history of contrast-induced nephropathy
- Decreased renal function: elevated serum creatinine (\>1.5 mg/dl)
- Severe arrhythmia: atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia, or advanced atrioventricular block (second or third degree heart block)
- Severe thyroid disease
- Homocystinuria
- History of asthma
- Hypersensitivity to adenosine
- Severe obstructive lung disease
- Intake of caffeine or xanthine-containing compounds within the last 48 hours
- Contraindication of MRI
- Claustrophobia
- Metallic hazards
- Pacemaker implant
- eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) \<30 ml/min
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Samsung Medical Centerlead
- Bayercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yeon Hyeon Choe, M.D.,Ph.D.
Samsung Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2014
First Posted
June 11, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2014-03