NCT02158650

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if presenting treatment options to basal cell carcinoma patients in video format will improve efficiency and allow patients to receive consistent, comprehensive, visually-depicted treatment option information to improve patient quality of care. Patients can learn more about treatment options as they are depicted visually so as to better assist them in understanding treatment risks and benefits to confidently make a well-informed decision. Primarily, the study will evaluate efficiency when using the education video medium. The study will also evaluate the effectiveness of the video medium as an aid to decision making in addition to standard of care in comparison to the standard of care alone. Additionally, the study will evaluate both patients' and dermatologists' satisfaction of the educational intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2014

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 17, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

June 2, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

informed consentvideo-based

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Satisfaction

    Paper surveys

    Up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Physicians' satisfaction

    Up to 10 hours (end of clinic day)

  • Change in health knowledge

    Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)

  • Video Medium Effectiveness

    Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)

Study Arms (2)

Video Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to Group II will be emailed the educational video, pre- and post- knowledge assessments, and patient satisfaction survey with instructions on what order to fill them out. Group II patients will report to the treatment visit and undergo discussion of options and treatment as per standard of care. An additional knowledge assessment survey will be administered to Group II patients after discussion with treating physician.

Behavioral: Video-Based Informed Consent

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients randomized to Group I will be come to the clinic for the treatment visit and discuss options and treatment as per standard of care. Pre- and post- discussion knowledge assessments and satisfaction surveys will be administered at the time of the treatment visit.

Interventions

Video Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients aged 18 or above for which treatment of Mohs surgery is not necessary and who agree to voluntarily participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma patients with an aggressive histologic subtype of BCC or for which treatment by Mohs surgery is deemed necessary based on clinician assessment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

Location

Atlanta VA Medical Center

Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Armstrong AW, Alikhan A, Cheng LS, Schupp C, Kurlinkus C, Eisen DB. Portable video media for presenting informed consent and wound care instructions for skin biopsies: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Nov;163(5):1014-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10067.x.

    PMID: 20977443BACKGROUND
  • Eggers C, Obliers R, Koerfer A, Thomas W, Koehle K, Hoelscher AH, Bollschweiler E. A multimedia tool for the informed consent of patients prior to gastric banding. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Nov;15(11):2866-73. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.340.

    PMID: 18070779BACKGROUND
  • Fleischman M, Garcia C. Informed consent in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Sep;29(9):952-5; discussion 955. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29251.x.

    PMID: 12930338BACKGROUND
  • Migden M, Chavez-Frazier A, Nguyen T. The use of high definition video modules for delivery of informed consent and wound care education in the Mohs Surgery Unit. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2008 Mar;27(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2008.02.001.

    PMID: 18486030BACKGROUND
  • Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):151-73. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364247. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

    PMID: 20357225BACKGROUND
  • Shukla AN, Daly MK, Legutko P. Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Nov 6.

    PMID: 22062774BACKGROUND
  • Weston J, Hannah M, Downes J. Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process. Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Mar;30(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(96)00968-8.

    PMID: 9104380BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Basal Cell

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Basal Cell

Study Officials

  • Suephy Chen, MD

    Emory University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2014

First Posted

June 9, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

August 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 17, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-08

Locations