Comprehensive Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System
CAMS-Knee
Kinematics and Joint Loading in Total Knee Arthroplasty
2 other identifiers
observational
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this research is to synchronously assess in vivo loading data of the knee joint, tibio-femoral 3D kinematics by means of automated video-fluoroscopy, whole leg kinematics by means of skin markers, ground reaction forces, as well as muscle activity patterns in 4 to 6 subjects with instrumented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during dynamic functional activities of daily life. The comprehensive in vivo dataset will provide unique information to evaluate the relationship between the kinematics, respectively the alignment of the TKA, and the resulting loading of the implant in vivo. The whole data package will be made available for download on a public database, such that it can be utilized for the testing and improvement of TKA designs as well as for the validation and improvement of musculoskeletal modelling by researchers around the world.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2014
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 5, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 9, 2017
CompletedOctober 11, 2017
October 1, 2017
1 month
June 2, 2014
October 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Video-fluoroscopy outcome parameters (kinematic parameters):
Quantification of the 3D kinematics of the TKA knee through fitting subject-specific 3D computer aided design models to the video-fluoroscopic data during functional activities.
up to 4 weeks
Knee joint loading outcome parameters (kinetic parameters)
In vivo measurements of internal joint contact forces and moments through the use of instrumented implants that are capable of non-invasively transmitting the forces and moments measured within the joint.
up to 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Optical motion capture outcome parameters
up to 4 weeks
Ground reaction force outcome parameters:
up to 4 weeks
Electromyography outcome parameters
up to 4 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Clinical outcome parameters
already available
Study Arms (1)
Instrumented knee implant
4-6 subjects with an instrumented TKA, that has been implanted within the study "Kniemessprothese: Belastungsmessung bei Patienten mittels einer instrumentierten Knie-Endoprothese" (EA4/069/06) approved and conducted at the Charité- Universitätsmedizin in Berlin, Germany, will be involved in this project.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients after total knee replacement surgery from the Charité- Universitätsmedizin in Berlin, Germany
You may qualify if:
- Instrumented TKA
- Participant of the study EA4/069/06, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany,
You may not qualify if:
- Not able to walk freely without walking aid
- Any medical condition that could impact on study results
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich
Zurich, 8093, Switzerland
Related Publications (10)
Konig C, Sharenkov A, Matziolis G, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN, Heller MO. Joint line elevation in revision TKA leads to increased patellofemoral contact forces. J Orthop Res. 2010 Jan;28(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/jor.20952.
PMID: 19637213BACKGROUNDKonig C, Matziolis G, Sharenkov A, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN, Heller MO. Collateral ligament length change patterns after joint line elevation may not explain midflexion instability following TKA. Med Eng Phys. 2011 Dec;33(10):1303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
PMID: 21764353BACKGROUNDTaylor WR, Heller MO, Bergmann G, Duda GN. Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing. J Orthop Res. 2004 May;22(3):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.09.003.
PMID: 15099644BACKGROUNDTrepczynski A, Kutzner I, Kornaropoulos E, Taylor WR, Duda GN, Bergmann G, Heller MO. Patellofemoral joint contact forces during activities with high knee flexion. J Orthop Res. 2012 Mar;30(3):408-15. doi: 10.1002/jor.21540. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
PMID: 22267190BACKGROUNDZihlmann MS, Gerber H, Stacoff A, Burckhardt K, Szekely G, Stussi E. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics of total knee arthroplasty during level walking using single plane video-fluoroscopy and force plates: a pilot study. Gait Posture. 2006 Dec;24(4):475-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Feb 10.
PMID: 16473011BACKGROUNDList R, Foresti M, Gerber H, Goldhahn J, Rippstein P, Stussi E. Three-dimensional kinematics of an unconstrained ankle arthroplasty: a preliminary in vivo videofluoroscopic feasibility study. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Oct;33(10):883-92. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0883.
PMID: 23050714BACKGROUNDList R, Gerber H, Foresti M, Rippstein P, Goldhahn J. A functional outcome study comparing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) subjects with pain to subjects with absent level of pain by means of videofluoroscopy. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Dec;18(4):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 May 12.
PMID: 23093123BACKGROUNDHeller MO, Mehta M, Taylor WR, Kim DY, Speirs A, Duda GN, Perka C. Influence of prosthesis design and implantation technique on implant stresses after cementless revision THR. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 May 13;6:20. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-20.
PMID: 21569522BACKGROUNDTaylor WR, Kornaropoulos EI, Duda GN, Kratzenstein S, Ehrig RM, Arampatzis A, Heller MO. Repeatability and reproducibility of OSSCA, a functional approach for assessing the kinematics of the lower limb. Gait Posture. 2010 Jun;32(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 May 23.
PMID: 20547061BACKGROUNDStacoff A, Kramers-de Quervain IA, Luder G, List R, Stussi E. Ground reaction forces on stairs. Part II: knee implant patients versus normals. Gait Posture. 2007 Jun;26(1):48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
PMID: 16979893BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William R Taylor, PhD
Institute for Biomechanics ETH Zurich Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Movement Biomechanics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2014
First Posted
June 5, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 9, 2017
Last Updated
October 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10