NCT02532933

Brief Summary

The overall purpose is to compare the kinematics and mechanics of medialized dome and anatomic resurfacing through measurement and simulation, and to correlate these findings with patient satisfaction and performance. Aim 1: Comparison of patellofemoral kinematics between dome and anatomic implant designs using stereo radiography and correlation with patient function as measured by Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, Knee Society score, and strength. Hypothesis: the anatomic patellar implant will have significantly greater sagittal flexion than the dome implant. Aim 2: Comparison of dome and anatomic moment arm, quadriceps efficiency, patellar contact mechanics and loading through the use of subject-specific simulation. Hypothesis: quadriceps efficiency and moment arm will be greater for the anatomic patellar implant, while loading between the patellar and femoral components will be reduced.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 18, 2015

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 26, 2015

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 27, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 27, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

August 18, 2015

Results QC Date

October 21, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Replacement, Knee

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patellar Flexion Measured as the Relative Angle Between the Femoral and Patellar Components of the Implant.

    Difference between dome and anatomic patellofemoral flexion, which is measured as the relative angle between the femoral and patellar components of the implant.

    One day

Study Arms (2)

Medialized Dome Patella

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects with total knee arthroplasty using the DePuy Synthes Attune Posterior Stabilized Rotating Platform including patella resurfacing with a medialized dome component geometry

Device: DePuy Synthes Attune PS RP

Anatomic Patella

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects with total knee arthroplasty using the DePuy Synthes Attune Posterior Stabilized Rotating Platform including patella resurfacing with an anatomic component geometry

Device: DePuy Synthes Attune PS RP

Interventions

Anatomic PatellaMedialized Dome Patella

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men and Women Age: 18-80 years
  • Unilateral or bilateral total knee replacement with an Attune posterior-stabilized rotating-platform implant including either medialized dome or medialized anatomic patellae
  • Minimum 9 months post TKA procedure

You may not qualify if:

  • Concomitant lower extremity injury that continues to cause pain or loss of normal function (70 or greater Knee Society score)
  • Inactive or unable to participate for health reasons (40 or greater on the physical component scale and and the mental component scale composite scores of the SF-12 Health Survey)
  • Neurologic deficit that affects function or understanding of testing protocol
  • Pregnant
  • Other participation in a research study involving exposure to x-ray radiation
  • body mass index greater than 30

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Links

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kevin Shelburne
Organization
University Of Denver

Study Officials

  • Kevin Shelburne, PhD

    University of Denver

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Research Engineer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2015

First Posted

August 26, 2015

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

November 27, 2019

Results First Posted

November 27, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11