Prevention of Seroma Formation and Wound Complications Using NPWT Devices
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The specific aim of this study is to improve post-operative wound care in the morbidly-obese body-contouring patient population following massive weight loss undergoing either panniculectomy or formal abdominoplasty, those patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction (i.e. ventral hernia repair) and breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix, as well as patients undergoing regular lipo-abdominoplasty by comparing the effectiveness of standard closed-suction drains versus the immediate application of continuous negative pressure via a NPWT (negative pressure wound therapy) device attached to non-compressible drains. Additionally, we aim to demonstrate increases both in cost-effectiveness and quality of life in these patients with the use of the NPWT wound care apparatus. Hypothesis 1 Continuous negative pressure devices decrease the incidence of wound complications in comparison with conventional closed suction drains when used in patients after massive weight loss undergoing body-contouring procedures (panniculectomies alone and formal abdominoplasties), and in patients undergoing VHR and breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix, as well as those undergoing regular lipo-abdominoplasty. Hypothesis 2 Although initially more costly than traditional closed suction drains, the use of continuous negative pressure devices will in the long-term result in lower total health care costs in the above-stated patient population due to a decreased need for additional procedures and/or clinical management, including surgical interventions, hospital admissions, administration of antibiotics, multiple follow-up office visits, and chronic wound care. Hypothesis 3 Better quality of life is associated with the use of continuous negative pressure devices compared to closed suction drains in these patient populations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2017
CompletedJanuary 30, 2017
December 1, 2016
2.4 years
May 21, 2014
August 11, 2016
December 6, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative Seroma Formation
Quantitative assessment of fluid collection in pre-defined anatomic regions will be performed via ultrasound examination approximately two weeks following removal of drains (either JP or NPWT-associated)
Two weeks following drain removal
Study Arms (10)
Breast Recon with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) on NPWT
EXPERIMENTALLipoabdominoplasty on NPWT
EXPERIMENTALThe Smith\&Nephew Renasys\*GO device connected to non-compressible drains will be applied to the lipoabdominoplasty patients enrolled in this arm.
Abdominoplasty on NPWT
EXPERIMENTALThe Smith\&Nephew Renasys\*GO device connected to non-compressible drains will be applied to the abdominoplasty patients enrolled in this arm.
Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR) on NPWT
EXPERIMENTALThe Smith\&Nephew Renasys\*GO device connected to non-compressible drains will be applied to the VHR patients enrolled in this arm.
Panniculectomy on NPWT
EXPERIMENTALThe Smith\&Nephew Renasys\*GO device connected to non-compressible drains will be applied to the panniculectomy patients enrolled in this arm.
Breast Recon with ADM on Jackson-Pratt (JP) Drains
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of Care. The Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain is used following surgery to collect bodily fluids from the surgical site.
Abdominoplasty on JP Drains
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of Care. The Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain is used following surgery to collect bodily fluids from the surgical site.
Lipoabdominoplasty on JP Drains
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of Care. The Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain is used following surgery to collect bodily fluids from the surgical site.
Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR) on JP Drains
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of Care
Panniculectomy on JP Drains
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of care. The Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain is used following surgery to collect bodily fluids from the surgical site.
Interventions
Continuous, mechanical negative pressure wound therapy applied to drain in the immediate post-operative period (vs standard, closed-suction JP drains).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- total patients undergoing panniculectomy alone following massive weight loss
- total patients undergoing formal abdominoplasty (including undermining of skin flaps, rectus fascia plication and liposuction) following massive weight loss
- total non-massive weight loss patients undergoing formal lipo-abdominoplasty
- total patients undergoing ventral hernia repair using acellular dermal matrix
- total patients undergoing bilateral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix with 30 breasts randomized to conventional closed suction (one breast left vs right) and 30 breasts randomized to continuous negative pressure devices (=60 breasts total)
You may not qualify if:
- presence of necrotic tissue
- untreated osteomyelitis
- malignancy (except terminal patients for quality of life issues)
- untreated malnutrition
- use on exposed arteries, veins, or organs
- use on non-enteric and unexplored fistulas Special precaution will be taken when using the NPWT device in patients on anticoagulants, exhibiting otherwise difficult hemostasis, or non-adherent patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
Related Publications (1)
Walker ME, Tsay C, Broer PN, Zhu VZ, Sturrock T, Ng R, Scoutt LM, Thomson JG, Kwei SL. A prospective, randomized-controlled pilot study comparing closed suction versus negative pressure drains for panniculectomy patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Mar;71(3):438-439. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 29289501DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Marc Walker
- Organization
- Yale University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J G Thomson, MD
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2014
First Posted
May 26, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 30, 2017
Results First Posted
January 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-12