A Randomized Trial of Ostomy Closure Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stoma closure has been associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI). The rate for SSI following stoma closure has been noted to be 7-41%; a rate that is higher than expected for a clean-contaminated operative classification. The ideal stoma site closure technique is still debated in the current literature. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of SSI following two different stoma closure techniques, primary closure versus a skin approximating purse string closure, in a multi-center randomized controlled trial. The investigators hypothesize that purse string closure technique will have a lower rate of SSI than primary closure technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2012
CompletedNovember 1, 2019
October 1, 2019
3.7 years
October 22, 2012
October 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
surgical site infection
30 days postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
delayed wound healing
30 days postoperatively
patient satisfaction
30 days postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Purse string closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergo a purse string closure of their old stoma site.
Primary closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients have their stoma sites close primarily with staples.
Interventions
1. An incision around the stoma will be made with 2-3 mm circumferential margins. This dissection along the mucocutaneous junction will then be made to the fascial defect. Re-establishment of bowel continuity will them be performed. If the circumferential incision does not provide adequate exposure, the incision can be converted to an elliptical one. Thereafter, it will be closed primarily with staples, similar to the primary closure group. 2. Following ostomy closure, the subcutaneous tissues will be irrigated. A 2-0 monocryl subcuticular purse string stitch will then be placed and cinched to a 1cm diameter. This opening will then be packed with Nu-Gauze as a wick dressing. 3. Diameter of the skin defect should then be measured. 4. A postoperative photo will then be taken.
1. An elliptical incision (extending transversely) will be made with 2-3 mm superior/inferior margins around the mucocutaneous junction. Dissection will then be made in a perpendicular fashion through the subcutaneous tissue with tapering near the fascial defect. Re-establishment of bowel continuity will then be performed. 2. Following ostomy closure, the subcutaneous tissue will be irrigated and the skin will be closed tight with staples placed at close intervals (\<1.5cm). No subcutaneous drains will be placed. 3. Length of the incision should be measured in centimeters. 4. A postoperative photo will then be taken.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects eligible are those with either a colostomy or ileostomy (end or loop) who are deemed by their surgeon to be appropriate candidates for ostomy closure. There will be no limitations based upon initial indication for formation of the ostomy. Indications for initial ostomy formation for fecal diversion can include: infection (e.g. diverticulitis) and protection of an anastomosis. (following resection for inflammatory bowel disease, benign diseases, or cancer)
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects will be excluded from the study if:
- The stoma site is left open to heal by secondary intention due to gross contamination (surgeon discretion)
- The stoma site is re-used (i.e. the same stoma site used for the formation of a new ostomy)
- A new stoma is created at a different site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Minnesotalead
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudoiscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Related Publications (1)
Lee JT, Marquez TT, Clerc D, Gie O, Demartines N, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA, Christoforidis D. Pursestring closure of the stoma site leads to fewer wound infections: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Nov;57(11):1282-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000209.
PMID: 25285695DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2012
First Posted
October 24, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10