The Impact of Burnout on Patient-Centered Care: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial in Mental Health
1 other identifier
interventional
679
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Healthcare providers play an important role in helping patients be actively involved in treatment and recover from mental illness. But mental health clinicians, like other healthcare providers, are at risk for experiencing burnout-feeling emotionally drained from their work, having cynical thoughts toward patients and others, and feeling little accomplishment in their work. Burnout can lead to problems for the clinician including poor overall health, depression, and lower job satisfaction. Burnout also can impact how clinicians perform on the job; for example, people with high levels of burnout take more time off, show lower commitment to their job, and are more likely to quit or be fired. There is some evidence that burnout can affect the quality of care for patients, but very little rigorous research has tested this assumption. The purpose of our study is threefold. First, we will investigate how patients perceive burnout in clinicians and whether (and/or how) burnout impacts the care they receive. Next, we will test an intervention to reduce clinician burnout called Burnout Reduction: Enhanced Awareness, Tools, Handouts, and Education (BREATHE). BREATHE brings together tools that mental health clinicians are already familiar with, including relaxation and mindfulness exercises, setting boundaries, using social supports, and changing negative thought patterns and replacing them with more helpful ways of thinking. We have found this intervention effective in reducing burnout in other organizations, but have yet to study whether it also can improve patient outcomes. Clinicians (approximately 200) who participate will receive either the BREATHE intervention or training in motivational interviewing, which could also improve patient involvement in treatment and patient outcomes, but is unlikely to significantly reduce clinician burnout. We will also recruit up to 600 adult patients served by participating clinicians. We will survey clinicians and interview patients over a 12-month period after the intervention to determine how the intervention impacts clinician burnout and patient perceptions of care (relationship with the clinician, degree of autonomy in decision making), patient involvement in care, and outcomes (confidence in managing mental health, symptoms, functioning, and hope). Finally, this study will use a statistical procedure called Structural Equation Modeling to test a theoretical model of the relationship between burnout and patient outcomes. Findings from this study will show whether reducing clinician burnout can improve patient outcomes and the quality of care that patients receive. Our intervention will have the potential to be easily implemented in a variety of settings where burnout is a problem. Knowing how clinician burnout impacts patient outcomes, and whether improving burnout can improve patient care, can help improve the healthcare system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 14, 2017
CompletedApril 14, 2017
April 1, 2017
2.3 years
May 21, 2014
April 11, 2017
April 11, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI): Emotional Exhaustion
Burnout was assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), a widely-used measure of three components of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. The survey contains 22 statements of job-related feelings and staff were asked to read each statement and decide if they ever felt that way about their job. The item scores were averaged. Scale: 0 (Never), 1 (A few times a year or less), 2 (Once a month or less), 3 (A few times a month), 4 (Once a week), 5 (A few times a week), 6 (Every Day). Maslach C, Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3 ed. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI): Depersonalization
Burnout was assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), a widely-used measure of three components of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. The survey contains 22 statements of job-related feelings and staff were ased to read each statement and decide if they ever felt that way about their job. The item scores were averaged. Scale: 0 (Never), 1 (A few times a year or less), 2 (Once a month or less), 3 (A few times a month), 4 (Once a week), 5 (A few times a week), 6 (Every Day). Maslach C, Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3 ed. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI): Personal Accomplishment
Burnout was assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), a widely-used measure of three components of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. The survey contains 22 statements of job-related feelings and staff were ased to read each statement and decide if they ever felt that way about their job. The item scores were averaged. Scale: 0 (Never), 1 (A few times a year or less), 2 (Once a month or less), 3 (A few times a month), 4 (Once a week), 5 (A few times a week), 6 (Every Day). Maslach C, Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3 ed. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (36)
Job Satisfaction
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Turnover Intentions-Considered Leaving
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Turnover Intentions-Likely to Leave
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Work Interference With Home Life
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Home Life Interference With Work
Measured with staff at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
- +31 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Motivational Interviewing-Mental Health Staff
ACTIVE COMPARATORBREATHE-Mental Health Staff
ACTIVE COMPARATORMotivational Interviewing-Clients
ACTIVE COMPARATORBREATHE-Clients
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
MI is a common counseling technique. It was offered as an 8-9 hour workshop across 3 sessions to mental health agency staff who were randomly assigned to MI. Each session occurred approximately one month apart.
BREATHE is a program developed to attempt to improve or prevent the symptoms of burnout. It was offered as an 8-9 hour workshop across 3 sessions to mental health agency staff who were randomly assigned to BREATHE. Each session occurred approximately one month apart.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A staff member with client contact at either Four County Counseling or Places for People.
- Randomly chosen client from the participating staff lists. Must be 18 years old or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Clients younger than 18 years old.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Indiana Universitylead
- Four County Counseling Centercollaborator
- Places for Peoplecollaborator
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Four County Counseling Center
Logansport, Indiana, 46947, United States
Places for People
St Louis, Missouri, 63108, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Absence of treatment as usual condition, high staff turnover, and difficulty linking patients with specific clinicians with whom they had meaningful contact
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michelle Salyers, PhD / Professor, Department of Psychology
- Organization
- Indiana University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle P Salyers, PhD
Indiana University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Department of Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2014
First Posted
May 23, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 14, 2017
Results First Posted
April 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share