Fluid Requirement During Surgery PVI v Doppler
PVIvDoppler
Non-invasive Assessment of Fluid Requirement During Surgery: a Comparison of Oesophageal Doppler and Pleth Variability Index
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Targeting the amount of fluid given to measurements of the patients own fluid status during major abdominal surgery has been linked with improved speed of recovery of gut function and reduced length of hospital stay, mortality and complications. Pleth variability index (PVI) offers a noninvasive, risk and pain free alternative to more invasive forms of monitoring to direct how much fluid to give. The study aims primarily to measure and compare how much fluid is given when guided by PVI compared to the established technique; oesophageal doppler during major abdominal surgery. The study will compare 40 patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery. Patients will receive intraoperative fluid guided by either oesophageal doppler or PVI. Secondarily, the study will examine biochemical markers, length of hospital stay and how frequently complications occur
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2014
CompletedMay 20, 2014
May 1, 2014
1.2 years
May 15, 2014
May 15, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between fluid volumes administered in the intra-operative period
End of operation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Difference in 24 hour fluid balance
24 hours
Post-operative morbiditiy survey
7 days
Biochemical Markers of Tissue Perfusion
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Doppler
ACTIVE COMPARATORFluid directed by oesophageal doppler
PVI
ACTIVE COMPARATORFluid therapy directed by Pleth Variability Index
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Major abdominal surgery
- Anaerobic Threshold \>11 ml O2/kg/min
- VE/VCO2 \<34 OR
- Low risk according to Consultant anaesthetist
You may not qualify if:
- Patients age less than 18
- Patient refused consent
- Patient unable to give consent
- Patient has had \<24hrs to consider the Patient information Sheet
- Contraindication to Doppler Probe being inserted
- Emergency Procedure
- Patient has a ASA Grade 5
- Patient is receiving dialysis treatment
- Patient has a known hypersensitivity to hydroxyethyl starch or gelatin solutions
- Patients with renal failure with oliguria or anuria - not related to hypovolaemia
- Patients with a previously diagnosed dysrhythmia
- Patients who weight \>100kg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
York Teaching Hospital
York, N Yorks, YO318HE, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Yates, MB ChB
York Teaching Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2014
First Posted
May 20, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 20, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05