Clinical Performance of Hydrogel vs. Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

NCT02131402 | Completed Results

• 1 other identifier: EX-MKTG-47
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 60
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The aim of this non-dispensing fitting study is to evaluate the subjective comfort, lens handling, lens fitting characteristics and visual acuity of different hydrogel lens designs versus silicone hydrogel lenses

Conditions

Myopia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (33)

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Handling - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal Pair #1 (1 hour). Rated by questionnaires (0= Very difficult 0-100, 100= very easy).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Handling - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal for Pair #2 (1 hour). Rated by questionnaires (0=Very difficult 0-100, 100= very easy).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Handling - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100 0=Very difficult, 100= very easy).

  1 hour post settling

• Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Surveyed after insertion of each lens Pair #2 (at insertion). Rated by Questionnaire (0-100,0=Can't be worn and causes pain, 100=can't feel).

  Baseline

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Surveyed after insertion of each lens at baseline visit for Pair #1. Rated by questionnaires (0-100, 0-Can't be worn and causes pain,100= can't feel).

  Baseline

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Surveyed after insertion Pair #3 (baseline). Rated by questionnaires (0-100, 0-Can't be worn, 100= can't feel).

  Baseline

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #1. Rated by questionnaires (0-100, 0= Can't be worn and causes pain, 100= can't feel).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. Rated by questionnaires (0-100 0=Can't be worn and causes pain, 100= can't feel).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=Can't be worn and causes pain 100= can't feel).

  1 hours post settling

• Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Surveyed after insertion of each lens Pair #1 at (Baseline visit). Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Omafilcon A, Strong Omafilcon A).

  Baseline

• Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Surveyed at insertion of each lens Pair #2 by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Ocufilcon D, Strong Ocufilcon D).

  Baseline

• Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Surveyed after insertion of each lens for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Methafilcon A, Strong Methafilcon A).

  Baseline

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling (1 hour) of lens wear for Pair #1. Rated by subjects preference for test lens or control lens (Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Omafilcon A, Strong Omafilcon A).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Ocufilcon D, Strong Ocufilcon D).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Methafilcon A, Strong Methafilcon A).

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Post-blink Movement, and Primary Gaze Lag - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling of lens wear for Pair #1. Slit lamp (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Post-blink Movement, and Primary Gaze Lag - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Post-blink Movement, and Primary Gaze Lag - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Tightness Push-up Test - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling of lens wear for Pair #1. Slit lamp. (0%-100%, continuous scale where 100%=no movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support).

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Tightness Push-up Test - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2, (0%-100%, continuous scale where 100%=no movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support).

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Tightness Push-up Test - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. (Scale 0%-100%, 0%-100%, continuous scale where 100%=no movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Centration - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling of lens wear for Pair #1. (4 possible ratings: optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable).

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Centration - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. (4 possible ratings: optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable)

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Centration - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3, (4 possible ratings: optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable)

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Surveyed after insertion of each lens for Pair #1 at baseline visit. Rated by questionnaires (0-100, 0=no sensation of stinging/burning, 100= extreme stinging).

  Baseline

• Participant Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Surveyed after insertion of each lens Pair #2 at baseline. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=no sensation of stinging/burning 100=extreme stinging)

  Baseline

• Participant Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Surveyed after insertion of each lens for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=no sensation of stinging/burning, 100=extreme stinging).

  Baseline

• Participants Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal Pair #1. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=no sensation of stinging/burning 100=extreme stinging).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0= no sensation of stinging/burning, 100= extreme stinging).

  1 hour post settling

• Participant's Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0= no sensation of stinging/burning,100= extreme stinging).

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A

  Visual acuity assessed after insertion of each study lens, prior to dispensing contralateral pairs Pair #1. LogMAR Visual Acuity (VA) to nearest letter)

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D

  Visual acuity assessed after insertion of each study lens, prior to dispensing contralateral pairs- Pair #2. LogMAR Visual Acuity (VA) to nearest letter)

  1 hour post settling

• Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A

  Visual acuity assessed after insertion of each study lens, prior to dispensing contralateral pairs- Pair #3. LogMAR Visual Acuity (VA) to nearest letter)

  1 hour post settling

Study Arms (3)

enfilcon A / omafilcon A

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants wear a pair of lenses, with a test lens in one eye and a control lens in the contra lateral eye. After approximately 1 hour of lens wear, the lenses will be removed and the next pair will be inserted. This will be repeated for a total of three pairs of lenses.

Device: omafilcon A

enfilcon A / ocufilcon D

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants wear a pair of lenses, with a test lens in one eye and a control lens in the contra lateral eye. After approximately 1 hour of lens wear, the lenses will be removed and the next pair will be inserted. This will be repeated for a total of three pairs of lenses.

Device: ocufilcon D

enfilcon A / methafilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants wear a pair of lenses, with a test lens in one eye and a control lens in the contra lateral eye. After approximately 1 hour of lens wear, the lenses will be removed and the next pair will be inserted. This will be repeated for a total of three pairs of lenses.

Device: methafilcon A

Interventions

ocufilcon D DEVICE

Contralateral pair of study lenses. Test lens (enfilcon A) in one eye and a control lens (ocufilcon D) in the contra lateral eye.

Also known as: Hydrogel Contact Lens

enfilcon A / ocufilcon D

omafilcon A DEVICE

Contralateral pair of study lenses. Test lens (enfilcon A) in one eye and a control lens (omafilcon A) in the contra lateral eye.

Also known as: Hydrogel Contact Lens

enfilcon A / omafilcon A

methafilcon A DEVICE

Contralateral pair of study lenses. Test lens (enfilcon A) in one eye and a control lens (methafilcon A) in the contra lateral eye.

Also known as: Hydrogel Contact Lens

enfilcon A / methafilcon A

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 40 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
• Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
• Is an adapted soft CL (Contact Lens) wearer
• Has a CL spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 10.00 (inclusive)
• Has a spectacle cylinder up to 0.75D (Diopter) in each eye.
• Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
• Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
• Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
• Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
• Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses
• Is willing to comply with the wear schedule
• Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

You may not qualify if:

• Has never worn contact lenses before.
• Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
• Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (5 days per week; \> 8 hours/day)
• Has a CL prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -10.00D
• Has a spectacle cylinder ≥1.00D of cylinder in either eye.
• Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
• Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities.
• Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
• Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
• Pathological dry eye or associated findings
• Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
• Neovascularization \> 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
• Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
• Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
• Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis

Sponsors & Collaborators

• CooperVision, Inc.: lead

Study Sites (1)

Optometry Research Group (GIO) Optics Department, University of Valencia

Valencia, 46100, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive Errors; Eye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

• Title: Dr. Robert Montés-Mico O.D., MPhil, PhD
• Organization: Optics Department, University of Valencia 46100 Valencia, Spain

robert.montes@uv.es

34-9635-44764

Study Officials

• Robert Montés-Mico, OD MPhil PhD

  Optics Department, University of Valencia

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

• PI is Sponsor Employee: No
• Restriction Type: OTHER
• Restrictive Agreement: Yes

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: INDUSTRY
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 28, 2014
• First Posted: May 6, 2014
• Study Start: May 1, 2014
• Primary Completion: May 1, 2014
• Study Completion: June 1, 2014
• Last Updated: April 4, 2017
• Results First Posted: July 22, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations

ES (1)