Skills to Enhance Positive Affect in Suicidal Adolescents
STEP
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The prevalence of suicidal behaviors in adolescents remains unacceptably high and is a significant public health concern. The investigators propose a new treatment approach in which skills to increase positive emotions are taught to the most vulnerable at-risk adolescents, those admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit due to suicide risk. The investigators believe that teaching skills to increase positive emotions will lead to better problem-solving, increased social support, and other benefits which will serve as protective factors and decrease suicide risk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 2, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 24, 2019
CompletedMarch 5, 2019
February 1, 2019
3.1 years
May 1, 2014
May 25, 2018
February 9, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Dot Probe Task
Dot probe tasks are administered to assess for attentional biases. The task is a computer task in which participants are presented with stimuli (e.g., words) of different valences (positive/negative/neutral) at the same time (e.g., smiling face and a neutral face), followed by a probe (\*) on one side. Participants are asked to hit a key that corresponds to the correct side in which the probe appeared. The reaction time of their response is indicative of their attention to the valenced image/word. Trials are counterbalanced so that valences appear equally on each side. Faster reaction time (less milliseconds) to positive images/words indicates an attentional bias for positive stimuli. The scores reported here represent bias scores. Positive scores indicate a bias to positive stimuli, negative scores indicate a bias towards neutral stimuli.
Baseline, 1 month Post Treatment, 4 month Follow-Up
Modified Differential Emotions Scale (Positive Emotions Sub-scale)
The Modified Differential Emotions Scale is a self-report measure comprised of ratings for positive and negative affect. For example, participants are asked to rate the extent to which they feel "Content, serene, peaceful right now" on a likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). The scores reported are averages for the positive emotions, and thus can be interpreted as ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). We expected an increase in positive affect ratings following the intervention.
Base, 1 month Post-Treatment, 4 month Follow-Up
Suicide Events
Number of participants who have attempted suicide or have had emergency intervention to intercede a suicide attempt.
1 month, 6 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Suicide Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Baseline, 1 month Post-Treatment, 4 month Follow-Up
Beck Depression Inventory
Baseline, 1 month Post-Treatment, 4 month Follow-Up
Columbia Impairment Scale Parent Version
Base, 1 month Post-Treatment, 4 month Follow-Up
Other Outcomes (1)
Hopelessness Scale for Children
Baseline, 1 month Post-Treatment, 4 month Follow-Up
Study Arms (2)
Positive Affect Skills Training
EXPERIMENTALIndividual sessions (3-4) delivered on the inpatient unit, focused on psycho-education regarding positive affect and mood monitoring and teaching of skills to attend to positive affect such as mindfulness, gratitude, and savoring. In-person sessions are followed by weekly phone calls and daily text messages for one month, with option to extend.
Treatment as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will follow the intervention plan laid out in their discharge summary, but do not receive any individual sessions regarding positive affect. Upon discharge, they will receive generic text messages regarding healthy habits for one month, with option to extend.
Interventions
Individual sessions (3-4) delivered on the inpatient unit, focused on psycho-education regarding positive affect and mood monitoring and teaching of skills to attend to positive affect such as mindfulness, gratitude, and savoring. In-person sessions are followed by weekly phone calls and daily text messages for one month, with option to extend.
Participants will follow the intervention plan laid out in their discharge summary, but do not receive any individual sessions regarding positive affect. Upon discharge, they will receive generic text messages regarding healthy habits for one month, with option to extend.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- current hospital admission due to concern of suicide risk
- ability of patient to speak, read, and understand English sufficiently well to complete the procedures of the study
- living at home
You may not qualify if:
- active psychotic disorder
- cognitive deficits that preclude full understanding of study materials
- adolescents who have become wards of the state and do not intend to return to the home of their biological or adoptive parents
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brown Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Butler Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study is not powered to observe between group differences or to examine mediators (e.g., increased social support or resources, improved problem-solving). Based on the encouraging preliminary data we are planning a larger trial.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shirley Yen, Ph.D., Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Alpert Brown Medical School
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shirley Yen, Ph.D.
Brown University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor (Research)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2014
First Posted
May 5, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 2, 2016
Study Completion
September 2, 2016
Last Updated
March 5, 2019
Results First Posted
January 24, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- 9/1/17
- Access Criteria
- Please contact PI at 401-444-1915
Data available upon completion of study by request.