NCT02122965

Brief Summary

Adverse drug events are unintended and harmful events related to medication use and a leading cause of emergency department visits, unplanned hospital admissions and deaths. In the emergency department, physicians frequently misdiagnose adverse drug events leading to treatment delays. Our objective is to evaluate the effect of pharmacist-led medication review in high-risk emergency department patients on prolonged hospital stay. This prospective multi-centre, quasi-randomized study is nested within an existing quality improvement program. Triage nurses flag incoming emergency department patients at high-risk for adverse drug events by applying a clinical decision rule consisting of four variables (co-morbid conditions, antibiotic use within 7 days, medication changes within 28 days, and age). Consecutive eligible high-risk patients are enrolled into the medication review study, and systematically allocated to pharmacist-led medication review or usual care. In the intervention group, medication review pharmacists collect best-possible medication histories, review the patient's medications for appropriateness and adverse drug events, and communicate the results of medication review to patients, caregivers and physicians. In the usual care group, physicians refer patients to onsite pharmacists for medication management questions on an as needed basis. Health outcomes are assessed using anonymized data linkage to administrative health databases. The primary outcome is the percent of days spent in hospital during the first 30 days after the index emergency department visit

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10,805

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 15, 2014

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2014

Status Verified

April 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

April 15, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of days spent in hospital over 30 days

    The primary outcome will be the proportion of days spent in hospital during the follow up period. This outcome captures all days in hospital that were incurred during the index admission as well as during any readmissions.

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Hospital admission

    on the 1 day of medication review

  • Prolonged hospital stay

    30 days

  • Unplanned emergency department re-visit

    7 days

  • Mortality

    30 days

  • Unplanned readmission

    30 days

Study Arms (2)

Pharmacist-led medication review

EXPERIMENTAL

Pharmacist-led medication review in the ED

Other: Pharmacist-led medication review

Usual care

NO INTERVENTION

Usual care includes nurse-led medication reconciliation.

Interventions

Medication review is a structured, critical examination of a patient's medications with the objective of reaching agreement with the patient about treatment, optimizing the medications' impact, and minimizing the number of medication-related problems and adverse drug events.

Pharmacist-led medication review

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Consecutive high-risk patients, aged 19 years or older, presenting to a participating emergency department when a medication review pharmacist is on duty are eligible for enrolment.

You may not qualify if:

  • We will exclude patients categorized as Canadian Triage Acuity Score (CTAS) 1 as they require immediate resuscitation, those presenting for multisystem trauma (e.g., penetrating trauma), scheduled visits (e.g., for intravenous antibiotics), sexual assaults, pregnancy-related complications, social problems, and those for whom we cannot link data to administrative records (e.g., out-of-province patients).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Lions Gate Hospital

North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Richmond Hospital

Richmond, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced Disorders

Study Officials

  • Corinne M Hohl, MD, MHSc

    University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2014

First Posted

April 25, 2014

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

April 25, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-04

Locations