The Effect of Medication Review in High-risk Emergency Department Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
10,805
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Adverse drug events are unintended and harmful events related to medication use and a leading cause of emergency department visits, unplanned hospital admissions and deaths. In the emergency department, physicians frequently misdiagnose adverse drug events leading to treatment delays. Our objective is to evaluate the effect of pharmacist-led medication review in high-risk emergency department patients on prolonged hospital stay. This prospective multi-centre, quasi-randomized study is nested within an existing quality improvement program. Triage nurses flag incoming emergency department patients at high-risk for adverse drug events by applying a clinical decision rule consisting of four variables (co-morbid conditions, antibiotic use within 7 days, medication changes within 28 days, and age). Consecutive eligible high-risk patients are enrolled into the medication review study, and systematically allocated to pharmacist-led medication review or usual care. In the intervention group, medication review pharmacists collect best-possible medication histories, review the patient's medications for appropriateness and adverse drug events, and communicate the results of medication review to patients, caregivers and physicians. In the usual care group, physicians refer patients to onsite pharmacists for medication management questions on an as needed basis. Health outcomes are assessed using anonymized data linkage to administrative health databases. The primary outcome is the percent of days spent in hospital during the first 30 days after the index emergency department visit
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2012
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2014
CompletedApril 25, 2014
April 1, 2014
2 months
April 15, 2014
April 23, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of days spent in hospital over 30 days
The primary outcome will be the proportion of days spent in hospital during the follow up period. This outcome captures all days in hospital that were incurred during the index admission as well as during any readmissions.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Hospital admission
on the 1 day of medication review
Prolonged hospital stay
30 days
Unplanned emergency department re-visit
7 days
Mortality
30 days
Unplanned readmission
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Pharmacist-led medication review
EXPERIMENTALPharmacist-led medication review in the ED
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONUsual care includes nurse-led medication reconciliation.
Interventions
Medication review is a structured, critical examination of a patient's medications with the objective of reaching agreement with the patient about treatment, optimizing the medications' impact, and minimizing the number of medication-related problems and adverse drug events.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive high-risk patients, aged 19 years or older, presenting to a participating emergency department when a medication review pharmacist is on duty are eligible for enrolment.
You may not qualify if:
- We will exclude patients categorized as Canadian Triage Acuity Score (CTAS) 1 as they require immediate resuscitation, those presenting for multisystem trauma (e.g., penetrating trauma), scheduled visits (e.g., for intravenous antibiotics), sexual assaults, pregnancy-related complications, social problems, and those for whom we cannot link data to administrative records (e.g., out-of-province patients).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Lions Gate Hospital
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Richmond Hospital
Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Corinne M Hohl, MD, MHSc
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2014
First Posted
April 25, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04