Preventive Physiotherapy Intervention in Elderly People With Sarcopenia
Effects and Costs of Preventive Physiotherapy Intervention in Institutionalized Elderly People With Sarcopenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
91
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates two strength training protocols (one in peripheral muscles and one in inspiratory muscles) in the improvement of skeletal muscle mass and function in institutionalized elderly with sarcopenia. Participants will be assigned randomly in a control or one of both experimental groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 23, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 15, 2018
July 1, 2017
2.2 years
April 16, 2014
November 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Muscle mass
Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) estimates the volume of fat and lean body mass. The test itself is inexpensive, easy to use, readily reproducible and appropriate for both ambulatory and bedridden patients. Reference: J Aging Phys Act 2015;23(4):597-606. Korean J Intern Med 2016;31:643-650.
The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).
Change in Maximum Respiratory Pressures (MIP and MEP)
MIP and MEP are probably the most frequently reported non-invasive estimates of respiratory muscle strength. Ever since Black and Hyatt (1969) reported this technique it has been widely used in patients, healthy control subjects across all ages, and athletes. Pressure is recorded at the mouth during a quasi-static short (few seconds) maximal breathing. Reference: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:531-535.
The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).
Change in Handgrip strength
Isometric hand grip strength is strongly related with lower extremity muscle power, knee extension torque and calf cross-sectional muscle area. In practice, there is also a linear relationship between baseline handgrip strength and incident disability for activities of daily living. Reference: Age and Aging. 2010;39:412-423.
The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).
Change in peripheral muscle strength
Maximal isometric muscle strength (Kg) was assessed for knee extension (Quadriceps femoris) and elbow flexion (Biceps brachii). Reference: J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 461-7.
The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Maximal Voluntary Ventilation (MVV)
The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).
Change in Time performed to walk 10 m distance (10mWT).
The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).
Other Outcomes (2)
Falls and fractures
Intervention costs will be recorded from the time zero to 12-weeks.
Intervention costs
Intervention costs will be recorded from the time zero to 12-weeks.
Study Arms (3)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONUsual care
Respiratory training group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will breathe against a load ≥ 50% of their baseline MIP, after which loads will increase according to the participant's tolerance across the remaining training period, using a Borg scale rating of 4 to 6 on perceived exertion as an indicator of adequate training intensity. Intervention: Inspiratory Muscle training (12-weeks)
Peripheral training group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will load ≥ 50% of their maximum muscle force (Kg), after which load will increase according to the participant's tolerance across the remaining training period, using a Borg scale rating of 4 to 6 on perceived exertion as an indicator of adequate training intensity. Intervention: Peripheral muscle training (12-weeks)
Interventions
Supervised interval-based program consisting of seven cycles of 2-minutes work and 1-minute rest. This protocol is published as a practical guide for clinicians by Hill et al (2010). The sessions will take place 3 times per week over a twelve-week period for a total of 36 sessions. All participants will be familiarized with the breathing exercises over a two-week familiarization period at the beginning of the protocol. The load will be adjusted at ≥ 50% of baseline MIP. Participants remain seated in groups of 8 to 10.
The supervised training program consists of one cycle of 10 exercises, 12 repetitions each one. The main peripheral muscles to be trained will be those recommended by Cruz-Jentoft et al (2011): brachial biceps and triceps, pectorals, deltoid, hand flexors and extensors, spine extensor muscles, psoas-iliac, quadriceps femoris and sural triceps. The sessions will take place 3 times per week over a twelve-week period for a total of 36 sessions. All participants were familiarized with the force exercises over a two-week familiarization period at the beginning of the protocol. The load will be adjusted at ≥ 50% of maximum muscle force. Participants remain seated in groups of 8 to 10.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- People aged \> 65 years
- Sarcopenia diagnosis (Tyrovolas et al., 2015)
- Medically stable at least 2 months before the study
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiorespiratory, muscular, neurological, or neuromuscular disease that could interfere in the proper performance of assessment and/or training protocols.
- Endocrine and metabolic disorders that might have had an effect on muscle mass.
- Severe disorder of hydration status that could interfere in Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (Rubbieri et al., 2014).
- A terminal disease diagnosis.
- Mini-Mental State Examination Index ≤ 20 score.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Grupo Gero Residencias "La Saleta"
Valencia, 46015, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
PMID: 20392703BACKGROUNDCruz-Jentoft AJ, Triana FC, Gomez-Cabrera MC, Lopez-Soto A, Masanes F, Martin PM, Rexach JA, Hidalgo DR, Salva A, Vina J, Formiga F. [The emergent role of sarcopenia: Preliminary Report of the Observatory of Sarcopenia of the Spanish Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2011 Mar-Apr;46(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2010.11.004. Epub 2011 Jan 8. Spanish.
PMID: 21216498BACKGROUNDDoherty TJ. Invited review: Aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Oct;95(4):1717-27. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00347.2003.
PMID: 12970377BACKGROUNDTyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Olaya B, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M, Chatterji S, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B, Koskinen S, Leonardi M, Haro JM. The role of muscle mass and body fat on disability among older adults: A cross-national analysis. Exp Gerontol. 2015 Sep;69:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
PMID: 26048566BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria A Cebrià i Iranzo, PT, PhD
University of Valencia
- STUDY CHAIR
María A Tortosa Chuliá, PhD
University of Valencia
- STUDY CHAIR
María J Ponce Darós, PT, PhD
University of Valencia
- STUDY CHAIR
Mercè Balasch i Bernat, PT, PhD
University of Valencia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2014
First Posted
April 23, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- CSR
- Time Frame
- 2018 Oct
- Access Criteria
- doi: 10.1123/japa.2017-0268
Results are published in a J Aging Phys Act. 2018. 1;26(4):637-646.