NCT02120586

Brief Summary

This study evaluates two strength training protocols (one in peripheral muscles and one in inspiratory muscles) in the improvement of skeletal muscle mass and function in institutionalized elderly with sarcopenia. Participants will be assigned randomly in a control or one of both experimental groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
91

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 16, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 23, 2014

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

November 15, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

April 16, 2014

Last Update Submit

November 13, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

ElderlyInstitutionalizationSarcopeniaStrength trainingMuscle massMuscle strengthPhysical performance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Muscle mass

    Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) estimates the volume of fat and lean body mass. The test itself is inexpensive, easy to use, readily reproducible and appropriate for both ambulatory and bedridden patients. Reference: J Aging Phys Act 2015;23(4):597-606. Korean J Intern Med 2016;31:643-650.

    The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).

  • Change in Maximum Respiratory Pressures (MIP and MEP)

    MIP and MEP are probably the most frequently reported non-invasive estimates of respiratory muscle strength. Ever since Black and Hyatt (1969) reported this technique it has been widely used in patients, healthy control subjects across all ages, and athletes. Pressure is recorded at the mouth during a quasi-static short (few seconds) maximal breathing. Reference: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:531-535.

    The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).

  • Change in Handgrip strength

    Isometric hand grip strength is strongly related with lower extremity muscle power, knee extension torque and calf cross-sectional muscle area. In practice, there is also a linear relationship between baseline handgrip strength and incident disability for activities of daily living. Reference: Age and Aging. 2010;39:412-423.

    The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).

  • Change in peripheral muscle strength

    Maximal isometric muscle strength (Kg) was assessed for knee extension (Quadriceps femoris) and elbow flexion (Biceps brachii). Reference: J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 461-7.

    The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Maximal Voluntary Ventilation (MVV)

    The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).

  • Change in Time performed to walk 10 m distance (10mWT).

    The groups will be assessed at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the training program (week 12, post-intervention).

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Falls and fractures

    Intervention costs will be recorded from the time zero to 12-weeks.

  • Intervention costs

    Intervention costs will be recorded from the time zero to 12-weeks.

Study Arms (3)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Usual care

Respiratory training group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will breathe against a load ≥ 50% of their baseline MIP, after which loads will increase according to the participant's tolerance across the remaining training period, using a Borg scale rating of 4 to 6 on perceived exertion as an indicator of adequate training intensity. Intervention: Inspiratory Muscle training (12-weeks)

Other: Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT).

Peripheral training group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will load ≥ 50% of their maximum muscle force (Kg), after which load will increase according to the participant's tolerance across the remaining training period, using a Borg scale rating of 4 to 6 on perceived exertion as an indicator of adequate training intensity. Intervention: Peripheral muscle training (12-weeks)

Other: Peripheral muscle training

Interventions

Supervised interval-based program consisting of seven cycles of 2-minutes work and 1-minute rest. This protocol is published as a practical guide for clinicians by Hill et al (2010). The sessions will take place 3 times per week over a twelve-week period for a total of 36 sessions. All participants will be familiarized with the breathing exercises over a two-week familiarization period at the beginning of the protocol. The load will be adjusted at ≥ 50% of baseline MIP. Participants remain seated in groups of 8 to 10.

Also known as: Threshold IMT (Respironics Health Inc. Cedar Grove, NJ, USA)
Respiratory training group

The supervised training program consists of one cycle of 10 exercises, 12 repetitions each one. The main peripheral muscles to be trained will be those recommended by Cruz-Jentoft et al (2011): brachial biceps and triceps, pectorals, deltoid, hand flexors and extensors, spine extensor muscles, psoas-iliac, quadriceps femoris and sural triceps. The sessions will take place 3 times per week over a twelve-week period for a total of 36 sessions. All participants were familiarized with the force exercises over a two-week familiarization period at the beginning of the protocol. The load will be adjusted at ≥ 50% of maximum muscle force. Participants remain seated in groups of 8 to 10.

Peripheral training group

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • People aged \> 65 years
  • Sarcopenia diagnosis (Tyrovolas et al., 2015)
  • Medically stable at least 2 months before the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Cardiorespiratory, muscular, neurological, or neuromuscular disease that could interfere in the proper performance of assessment and/or training protocols.
  • Endocrine and metabolic disorders that might have had an effect on muscle mass.
  • Severe disorder of hydration status that could interfere in Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (Rubbieri et al., 2014).
  • A terminal disease diagnosis.
  • Mini-Mental State Examination Index ≤ 20 score.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Grupo Gero Residencias "La Saleta"

Valencia, 46015, Spain

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034. Epub 2010 Apr 13.

    PMID: 20392703BACKGROUND
  • Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Triana FC, Gomez-Cabrera MC, Lopez-Soto A, Masanes F, Martin PM, Rexach JA, Hidalgo DR, Salva A, Vina J, Formiga F. [The emergent role of sarcopenia: Preliminary Report of the Observatory of Sarcopenia of the Spanish Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2011 Mar-Apr;46(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2010.11.004. Epub 2011 Jan 8. Spanish.

    PMID: 21216498BACKGROUND
  • Doherty TJ. Invited review: Aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Oct;95(4):1717-27. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00347.2003.

    PMID: 12970377BACKGROUND
  • Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Olaya B, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M, Chatterji S, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B, Koskinen S, Leonardi M, Haro JM. The role of muscle mass and body fat on disability among older adults: A cross-national analysis. Exp Gerontol. 2015 Sep;69:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

    PMID: 26048566BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SarcopeniaSyndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular AtrophyNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsDiseasePathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Maria A Cebrià i Iranzo, PT, PhD

    University of Valencia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • María A Tortosa Chuliá, PhD

    University of Valencia

    STUDY CHAIR
  • María J Ponce Darós, PT, PhD

    University of Valencia

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mercè Balasch i Bernat, PT, PhD

    University of Valencia

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2014

First Posted

April 23, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

June 1, 2016

Last Updated

November 15, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Results are published in a J Aging Phys Act. 2018. 1;26(4):637-646.

Shared Documents
CSR
Time Frame
2018 Oct
Access Criteria
doi: 10.1123/japa.2017-0268
More information

Locations