NCT02119351

Brief Summary

The objective of this post-market, prospective study is to evaluate the clinical acceptability, blood leakage, risk for blood exposure, need for digital compression, insertion success, and clinical utility of the ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter compared to standard hospital PIVCs currently being used.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 12, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 21, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2014

Status Verified

April 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

July 12, 2013

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

peripheral intravenous cathetersblood exposureblood controlIV catheter insertion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Clinical acceptability of PIVC insertion

    Demonstrate non-inferiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control PIVC for ratings of clinical acceptability. Clinicians will agree or disagree that the device was clinically acceptable for the insertion.

    Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion

  • Frequency of blood leakage

    Demonstrate superiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control in preventing blood leakage from the catheter hub during insertion.

    Clinicians will report if blood leakage occurred immediately after the catheter insertion

  • Eliminating risk of blood exposure

    Demonstrate superiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control PIVC in eliminating the clinician's risk of blood exposure during the insertion process.

    Clinicians will report on the ability of the PIVC to eliminate blood exposure immediately after catheter insertion

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Insertion success

    Clinicians will report if the insertion was successful immediately after performing insertion

  • Elimination of digital compression

    Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion

  • Ease of Use

    Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion

Study Arms (2)

ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Insertion of the ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter

Device: ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter

ProtectIV® Plus Safety IV Catheter

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Insertion of the ProtectIV® Plus Safety IV Catheter

Device: ProtectIV® Plus Safety IV Catheter

Interventions

Safety peripheral IV catheter with a blood control feature

ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter

Safety peripheral IV catheter with no blood control feature

ProtectIV® Plus Safety IV Catheter

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A peripheral intravenous catheter will need to be inserted in order to gain access to a vein or artery to sample blood, monitor blood pressure, or administer fluids intravenous infusion as part of treatment.
  • Willing and able to sign an Informed Consent (patient or legally authorized representative).

You may not qualify if:

  • Body morphology (e.g., size) precludes the use of a peripheral intravenous catheter.
  • Fluid to be infused is not appropriate for peripheral intravenous catheters.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Location

Study Officials

  • Andrew McRae, MD, PhD

    U of Calgary and Alberta Health Services

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2013

First Posted

April 21, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 21, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-04

Locations