Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
294
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Genital prolapse is a common condition (up 20%), affecting the quality of life. Treatment can be surgical or conservative using vaginal pessaries. These devices are introduced into the vagina aiming to reduces the prolapse. Pessaries have shown effectiveness in improving symptoms and quality of life. There are no randomized studies comparing them with surgery. This study design would be difficult to perform, because the inclusion criteria for both treatments are different. There are no currently standard protocols for the use of pessaries. This makes harder to widespread the usage of this conservative treatment. The aim of the investigators is to identify variables that influence the success of conservative management of genital prolapse at 1 year of follow up. Using these variables and an expert panel opinion the investigators will develop a standardized protocol for pessary management. Chile has a primary gynecological care system based midwives. Therefore having algorithms for pessaries usage becomes relevant. This algorithm can be implemented with basic training. This would increase the respond capacity, by the health care system to this disease, considering the scarce access to surgery. The investigators hypothesis is: It is possible to generate a standardized protocol of conservative management of symptomatic genital prolapse in patient's beneficiary of public health system in Santiago, Chile, using pessaries through a prospective cohort study based in the success of these devices with 1 year of follow up, measured with questionnaires of symptoms, quality of life and sexuality
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 18, 2014
November 1, 2014
1.5 years
April 9, 2014
November 17, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Quality of Life changes in pessary users for symptomatic Pelvic Organs Prolapse
At baseline, 6 and 12 month the Chilean Version of the P-QoL survey will be applied to describe the QoL changes
6 months and 12 months
Pelvic Floor Disorders symptoms changes in pessary users for symptomatic Pelvic Organs Prolapse
At baseline, 6 and 12 month the Chilean Version of the Pelvic Distress Inventory - 20 (PDFI-20) survey will be applied to describe the symptoms changes
6 months and 12 months
Sexual response changes in pessary sexually active women users for symptomatic Pelvic Organs Prolapse
At baseline, 6 and 12 month the Chilean Version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) survey will be applied to describe the Sexually response changes
6 months and 12 months
Subjective impression of improvement after pessary use for symptomatic Pelvic Organs Prolapse
At baseline, 6 and 12 month the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) survey will be applied to describe the subjective improvement
6 months and 12 months
Successful usage of pessary
If an enrolled patients is still using the pessary as the treatment for the pelvic organ prolapse will be considered as "successful". Risk factors for unsuccessful pessary used will be measure using baseline characteristics.
12 months
Study Arms (1)
Vaginal Pessary
EXPERIMENTALPessary users for at least 12 months
Interventions
Pessary fitting session at recruitment, follow up at 1 week, then monthly to complete 1 year follow up. QoL, symptoms and sexual function Surveys will be conducted at recruitment, 6 and 12 month. The absence of bacterial vaginosis (through study of vaginal discharge and pH) will be checked prior to positioning pessary and then each control. At the end of follow up period the success related variables will be determine with a statistical model. This information will be analyzed by an expert panel aiming to identify relevant clinical variables not included. This panel will generate a Standardized Management Protocol for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse using vaginal pessaries.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Commitment to attend controls
- Current negative cervical cytology
- Informed consent signed
You may not qualify if:
- Urinary incontinence as the only Pessary Indication
- Vaginal bleeding of undetermined cause
- Unable to return to controls
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unidad de Uroginecologia, Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sotero del Rio
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8207257, Chile
Related Publications (1)
Arellano M, Santis-Moya F, Maluenda A, Pattillo A, Blumel B, Pohlhammer D, Gonzalez S, Pizarro-Berdichevsky J. Prevalence of colorectal symptoms and anal incontinence in patients with pelvic organ prolapse attended at an outpatient urogynecology service. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Mar 15;46:e-rbgo10. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024AO10. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38765524DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Javier Pizarro, MD
Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sotero del Rio
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bernardita Blumel, MD
Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sotero del Rio
- STUDY CHAIR
Silvana Gonzalez, Midwife
Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sotero del Rio
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alejandro Pattillo, MD
H. Dr. Sotero del Rio; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2014
First Posted
April 15, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 18, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11