NCT03271294

Brief Summary

The aim of the study was to assess the role of the Exair transvaginal mesh system to correct pelvic organ prolapse from a subjective and objective standpoint. Subjects treated with the Exair transvaginal mesh for prolapse between June 2013 and August 2015 was analyzed. Subjects with uterine prolapse underwent vaginal mesh hysteropexy. There were no hysterectomies done for uterine prolapse in this study. A composite score that included subjective criteria of absence of a bothersome bulge, no prolapse below the hymen and no retreatment was used to assess success.Transvaginal Exair mesh hysteropexy offers a good option for the management of large uterine prolapses precluding the need for a hysterectomy.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 19, 2013

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2015

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

August 29, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapseExairTransvaginal mesh

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Exair transvaginal mesh procedure success in anatomy and function at 1 year

    Subjects who underwent the Exair transvaginal mesh surgery were followed post-operatively to determine mesh procedure success at 12 months. A composite score that included subjective criteria of absence of a bothersome bulge, no prolapse below the hymen and no retreatment was used to assess success. Subjects treated with the Exair transvaginal mesh for prolapse between June 2013 and August 2015 was analyzed. The aim of the study was to assess the role of the Exair transvaginal mesh system to correct pelvic organ prolapse from a subjective and objective standpoint.

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

Exair transvaginal mesh surgery

OTHER

This is a prospective study done in 80 consecutive subjects who underwent the Exair transvaginal mesh surgery from June 2013 to August 2015. The subjects were followed at 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively. All eligible subjects underwent a detailed urogynecologic history and examination including a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system assessment (POP-Q).

Device: Exair Transvaginal Mesh

Interventions

Exair transvaginal mesh system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Exair transvaginal mesh surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • subjects desiring surgery for stage II or greater prolapse on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System Assessment (POP-Q) and symptoms specific to pelvic organ prolapse mainly bothersome perception of a vaginal bulge

You may not qualify if:

  • any physical or mental limitation that precluded their participation or inability to give informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Urogynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2017

First Posted

September 5, 2017

Study Start

April 19, 2013

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

August 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 5, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08