NCT02111421

Brief Summary

Currently, spinal anesthesia is most commonly used for cesarean section.But spinal anesthesia can not block the visceral vagus nerve, and the patients are prone to nausea, vomiting, chest tightness or other discomfort when the uterus is stretched .For parturients who have poor uterine contractions and are bleeding larger, obstetricians often use oxytocin to strengthen the contraction of the uterine,which also would increase the parturients' discomfort.Anesthesiologists often intravenous sedative hypnotics (eg.propofol or midazolam) to alleviate the fear of the parturients after the baby is delivered.One of the side effects of propofol or midazolam is that they would lead to the respiratory depression.For the poor respiratory reserve of the parturients, functional residual capacity(FRC) of this group could be reduced by up to 20%, and the oxygen consumption was also increased.The SPO2 could decline quickly intraoperatively.Dexmedetomidine is a novel , highly selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonists , and its selectivity for α2 receptor is 1600 times higher than α1.It also could provide dose-dependent sedation , analgesia , anti-anxiety and inhibition of sympathetic nerves and other effects.Because of its minimal impact on the respiratory , it could safely and effectively used to sedate patients undergoing cesarean section.But the change of endocrine system and hemodynamic of the parturients may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of some anesthetic drugs.Currently studies have demonstrated the increased sensitivity of some anesthetic drug in parturients, such as lidocaine and isoflurane.The study is aim to explore the optimal dexmedetomidine dose to produce suitable sedation in parturients ,and compared with norman nonpregnant women.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

November 28, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

April 7, 2014

Last Update Submit

November 24, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

dexmedetomidineparturientnonpregnant womensedation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The assessment of sedation

    The aim of our study is to define the median effective sedative dose (ED50) of dexmedetomidine for providing adequate sedation in cesarean surgery,using the Dixon up-and-down method. Adequate sedation was defined as an OAA/S≤3 at any assessment time point during the 30 min after dexmedetomidine infusion.

    every 5 min after starting the dexmedetomidine infusion for 30 min

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • comparision of ED50

    every 5 min after starting the dexmedetomidine infusion for 30 min

Study Arms (2)

parturients

EXPERIMENTAL

Parturients after the umbilical cord was clapped in cesarean section were accepted an initial dose of 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, with dose adjustment intervals of 0.1μg/kg in first three turning points and 0.05μg/kg in the last four turning points.

Drug: Dexmedetomidine 01

nonpregnant women

EXPERIMENTAL

Nonpregnant women were accepted an initial dose of 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, with dose adjustment intervals of 0.1μg/kg in first three turning points and 0.05μg/kg in the last four turning points.

Drug: Dexmetomidine 02

Interventions

Initial dose of dexmedetomidine was 1.0 μg/kg, with dose adjustment intervals of 0.1μg/kg in first three turning points and 0.05μg/kg in the last four turning points,after the umbilical cord was clapped.The wight used to calculate the dose of dexmedetomidine would be that the total weight of the mother minus the weight of the placenta, amniotic fluid and fetal.

parturients

Initial dose of dexmedetomidine was 1.0 μg/kg, with dose adjustment intervals of 0.1μg/kg in first three turning points and 0.05μg/kg in the last four turning points,as soon as the spinal anesthesia

nonpregnant women

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA Ⅰ \~ Ⅱ women undergoing cesarean surgery under spinal anesthesia
  • ASA Ⅰ \~ Ⅱ nonpregnancy women undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia
  • Written informed consent from the patient or the relatives of the participating patient
  • nonpregnancy women BMI:18~25 kg/m2 , parturients BMI \<35kg/m2

You may not qualify if:

  • Mental illness can not match
  • Spinal anesthesia contraindicated
  • People who have Slow-type arrhythmias
  • People who were language or hearing impaired
  • Sensory block reached to T6 or higher.
  • People who had lung infection or sleep apnea syndrome.
  • Chronic renal failure
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Already taking gabapentin, pregabalin, benzodiazepin or antidepression drug

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Guangzhou Military Region General Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510010, China

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Xiong M, Chen B, Hu Z, Gupta S, Li Z, Liu J, He J, Patel S, Eloy JD, Xu B. Dose Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Sedation following Spinal Anesthesia: Parturient versus Nonpregnant Women-A Randomized Trial. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020 Jul 27;2020:1059807. doi: 10.1155/2020/1059807. eCollection 2020.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate chief physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2014

First Posted

April 11, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2016

Last Updated

November 28, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11

Locations