Study Stopped
No inclusions.
Post-cesarean Pain Control Via Continuous Infusion of Ropivacain et Diclogenac Into the Wound Versus Intathecal Morphine
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal is to compare the quality of post-cesarean analgesia, the side effects and the incidence of residual scar pain obtained with intrathecal morphine (reference treatment) or with a continuous intra-wound solution including both ropivacain and diclofenac (experimental treatment).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 25, 2015
March 1, 2015
2.1 years
September 28, 2010
March 24, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary VAS score
The patient is asked to evaluate cesarean-section related pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain on a scale of 1-10 in a sitting position.
36 hours post delivery
Study Arms (2)
Reference
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntrathécale morphine is used for post-cesarean pain control
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALA solution including both ropivacain and diclofenac continuously delivered to the wound is used for post-cesarean pain control
Interventions
A solution including both ropivacain and diclofenac continuously delivered to the wound is used for post-cesarean pain control
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- single, normally progressing pregancy
- term \> 36 weeks amenorrhea
- BMI between 20 and 25 kg/m\^2 before pregnancy
- height between 55 and 90 kg
- cesarean section by Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel techniques
- patient has signed consent
- patient has social security coverage
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple pregnancy
- pathological pregnancy: hypertension (\>140/90 mmHg found during the pregnancy), pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes
- term \< 36 weeks amenorrhea
- non-pregnancy related maternal pathology (insufficiency)
- obesity (BMI \> 25 kg/m\^2 before pregnancy)
- height \< 155 cm or \> 180 cm
- weight \< 55 kg or \> 90 kg
- patient refuses to sign consent
- surgical technique other than Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel
- hepatic insufficiency (prothrombin \< 60%)
- contra-indications for rachianesthesia: infection, hemostasis problems (platelets \< 80.109/L, prothrombin \< 60%, TCA \> 40s)
- allergy to local anesthestics
- patient is participating in another study, or has participated in another study within the last 6 months
- patient is under any type of guardianship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antoinie Guy Aya, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2010
First Posted
September 29, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 25, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03