Virtual Advisors for Physical Activity Promotion in Underserved Communities
COMPASS2
1 other identifier
interventional
245
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this research study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a computer-based 'virtual lay advisor' intervention relative to a proven human lay advisor/promotore intervention to promote regular walking among inactive midlife and older Latino adults. The primary analysis is a non-inferiority analysis comparing these two interventions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 18, 2019
CompletedNovember 10, 2020
October 1, 2020
3.9 years
April 2, 2014
September 20, 2019
October 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Total Weekly Walking Minutes From Baseline to 12 Months
Total weekly walking minutes as measured by self-report (CHAMPS Physical Activity Questionnaire)
baseline, 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 12 Months
baseline, 12 months
Change in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity From Baseline to 12 Months
baseline, 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Promotora for physical activity
ACTIVE COMPARATORWeekly sessions with a volunteer promotora at a community center. A promotora is a trained, lay health worker. The promotora will provide guidance, advice and support to participants to encourage them to be more physically active.
Carmen system
EXPERIMENTALWeekly sessions with the virtual advisor accessed through a computer located at a community center. Carmen is the virtual advisor and will provide guidance, advice and support to participants to encourage them to be more physically active.
Interventions
The virtual advisor is named Carmen. She is an animated, computer-generated figure that speaks to participants and gives advice and support for physical activity.
A promotora is a trained, lay health worker. Promotoras will be trained and supervised to provide advice, support and guidance to people to encourage them to be more physically active. They work with people face to face and by telephone to offer support and advice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spanish or English-speaking primarily Latino men or women
- Aged greater than or equal to 50 years
- No plans to move within the next year
- Inactive (have not engaged in moderate-intensity or more vigorous physical activity
- \> 3 days per week for at least 20 min per day) within last 6 months
- Able to participate in study intervention and assessments at their local neighborhood senior center
You may not qualify if:
- Any medical condition or disorder that would limit participation in moderate intensity physical activity (such as sustained walking), including life-threatening disorders, myocardial ischemia, major functional disabilities in the orthopedic area, or inability to complete baseline assessments for any reason (including psychological, cognitive);
- Not stable on their medications, including hormone replacement therapy, for ≥ 3 months (given that changes in medications can create additional stress and burden over and above attempts to change lifestyle behaviors);
- Inability to complete a face-to-face training session with a computer-based program
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- Northeastern Universitycollaborator
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stanford Prevention Research Center
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Related Publications (5)
Zamora AN, Campero MI, Garcia DM, Chavez DM, King AC. Acculturation is associated with 12-month adherence to combined MVPA and sedentary behavior guidelines in a sample of midlife and older Latino/a adults: findings from the COMPASS physical activity trial. BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21885-3.
PMID: 39987024DERIVEDRoyer MF, Hauser ME, Zamora AN, Campero MI, Garcia D, Gabaray M, Sheats JL, King AC. Serving up FLAN. a food literacy and nutrition intervention to fend off food insecurity. BMC Nutr. 2024 Jul 23;10(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00909-y.
PMID: 39044224DERIVEDRoyer MF, Hauser ME, Zamora AN, Campero MI, Garcia D, Gabaray M, Sheats JL, King AC. Serving Up FLAN. A Food Literacy and Nutrition Intervention to Fend Off Food Insecurity. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 7:rs.3.rs-4331290. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4331290/v1.
PMID: 38766254DERIVEDKing AC, Campero MI, Sheats JL, Castro Sweet CM, Hauser ME, Garcia D, Chazaro A, Blanco G, Banda J, Ahn DK, Fernandez J, Bickmore T. Effects of Counseling by Peer Human Advisors vs Computers to Increase Walking in Underserved Populations: The COMPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1481-1490. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4143.
PMID: 32986075DERIVEDKing AC, Campero I, Sheats JL, Castro Sweet CM, Garcia D, Chazaro A, Blanco G, Hauser M, Fierros F, Ahn DK, Diaz J, Done M, Fernandez J, Bickmore T. Testing the comparative effects of physical activity advice by humans vs. computers in underserved populations: The COMPASS trial design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;61:115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
PMID: 28739541DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abby C King, PhD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2014
First Posted
April 11, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 30, 2018
Study Completion
April 30, 2018
Last Updated
November 10, 2020
Results First Posted
October 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2020-10