Improving Ultrasound Images in Brain Tumor Surgery With the Use of Brain Mimicking Fluid
BMF
Brain Mimicking Fluid. Improving Ultrasound Images in Brain Tumor Surgery With the Use of Brain Mimicking Fluid: a Preliminary Technical and Safety Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prognosis in patients with glioblastomas (the most aggressive high-grade glioma) remains unfavourable. Tools for improving brain tumor surgery, in particular for gliomas, are increasing. There seems to be an agreement that achieving extensive resections, when done safely without jeopardizing neurological function, improves survival. Ultrasound is currently used as a tool for providing 2D or 3D images for the purpose of tumor localization and resection control. For the use in resection control the resection cavity is filled with saline to provide acoustic coupling between the ultrasound transducer and tissue. However, attenuation of acoustic waves is very low in saline compared to the brain and this difference in attenuation is the cause of artifacts that may severely degrade the ultrasound images. Such artifacts are seen as high-intensity signal at the resection cavity wall and beyond, potentially masking small tumor remnants and generally making the interpretation of images more difficult. This research group has developed an acoustic fluid intended for use in the resection cavity instead of saline. Tests in laboratory measurements have shown that the fluid reduces artifacts and has the potential to enhance ultrasound image quality in brain tumor surgery. The investigators expect that the acoustic fluid will make it easier to detect small tumor remnants near the end of an operation, thus increasing success of glioma surgery. The purpose of this study is to test the fluid during surgery for histopathologically proven glioblastoma to assess safety and efficacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Feb 2014
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedApril 9, 2019
April 1, 2019
2.2 years
April 2, 2014
April 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
adverse events
All adverse events registered but with special emphasis on: Intraoperatively -- epileptic seizures Immidiate postoperative -- hydrocephalus (MR images), imflammation of tissue that was in contact with AF (MR images)
1-72 hours
adverse events
All adverse events registered but with special emphasis on: hydrocephalus (MR images) inflammation (MR images)
1 month
adverse events
All adverse events registered but with special emphasis on: hydrocephalus (MR images), inflammation (MR images)
6 months
adverse events
All adverse events registered but with special emphasis on: unusual clinical events, neurological deterioration or reduced consciousness
up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
image quality
1 day
image signal-to-noise ratio
1 day
Study Arms (1)
BMG
EXPERIMENTALbrain mimicking fluid
Interventions
filled into the operation cavity during surgery for glioblastoma
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A glioblastoma is suspected when there is a solitary brain tumour with ring-like contrast enhancement and oedema with no recent history (last 3 years) of primary tumour elsewhere
- In cases where histopathology is not known from previous biopsy or resection (i.e. diagnosis is suspected based on MRI findings and not from previous surgery) a tissue sample for frozen section is necessary. The fluid will only be used in cases where glioblastoma is suggested from this preliminary histopathological assessment.
You may not qualify if:
- Intended biopsy only (meaning: cases not suitable for resection)
- Other entities than glioblastoma is suspected
- Allergy to diary products and marine products
- Hypersensitvity to egg protein
- Hypersensitivity to soya or peanut protein
- Hypersensitvity to glycerol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Olavs Hospitallead
- National Competence Services for Ultrasound and Image-guided Therapycollaborator
- SINTEF Health Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neurosurgery, St Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Geir Bråthen, phd md
St. Olavs Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2014
First Posted
April 7, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04