A Dose Ranging Vehicle Controlled Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Permethrin Foam, 5% and Permethrin Foam, 4% for the Treatment of Scabies
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparison Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Permethrin Foam, 5% Versus Permethrin Foam, 4% Versus Vehicle in Subjects With Sarcoptes Scabiei
1 other identifier
interventional
130
4 countries
9
Brief Summary
To determine and compare the safety and efficacy of permethrin foam 4% and permethrin foam 5% with that of vehicle in subjects with scabies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Apr 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 15, 2021
CompletedApril 26, 2023
April 1, 2023
8 months
March 20, 2014
August 19, 2020
April 24, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Subjects Who Received a Single Treatment of the Assigned Test Article That Were Designated as "Treatment Success"
The primary efficacy variable is "treatment success". In protocol v2.0, "treatment success" was defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). In protocol v3.0, "treatment success" was defined as an "eradication of infestation": a) no burrows, b) a reduction in the Signs/Symptoms, and c) no evidence of a live mite on microscopy.
Day 28
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Disease-related Signs and Symptoms for Those Subjects Provided With Re-treatment at Day 14 Who Show Improvement in Their Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score at Day 28
Baseline, Day 14, 28, and 42
Number of Re-treated Subjects Designated as "Treatment Success"
Day 42
Number of Subjects Designated as "Treatment Success" Following One Treatment With an Active Dose
Day 28 and Day 42
Study Arms (4)
Permethrin Foam 4%/ Permethrin Foam 4%
EXPERIMENTALFirst treatment with Permethrin Foam 4% with potential to re-treat with Permethrin Foam 4%, if necessary.
Permethrin Foam 5%/ Permethrin Foam 5%
EXPERIMENTALFirst treatment with Permethrin Foam 5% with potential to re-treat with Permethrin Foam 5%, if necessary.
Vehicle Foam / Permethrin Foam 4%
PLACEBO COMPARATORFirst treatment with Vehicle with potential to re-treat with Permethrin Foam 4%, if necessary.
Vehicle / Permethrin Foam 5%
PLACEBO COMPARATORFirst treatment with Vehicle with potential to re-treat with Permethrin Foam 5%, if necessary.
Interventions
Topical application, whole-body treatment
Topical application, whole-body treatment
Topical application, whole-body treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of active scabies infection.
- Subject is in good general health with normal appearing skin in noninfested areas.
- Females must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile or use an effective method of birth control with a negative pregnancy test (10 years of age and older) at study start.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is pregnant, lactating, or is planning to become pregnant during the study.
- Subject has used any ectoparasiticide within the three weeks prior to study start.
- Subject has signs of systemic infection or is receiving systemic therapy for an infectious disease.
- Subject has severe cutaneous bacterial or fungal infections requiring therapy or heavily crusted lesions consistent with Norwegian scabies.
- Subject is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study or has used an investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to study start.
- Subject whose close personal contacts will not comply with standard of care for fomite management.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mylan Inc.lead
- DPT Laboratories, Ltd.collaborator
- Vyne Therapeutics Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (9)
Clinical Research Site
Fremont, California, 94538, United States
Clinical Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90036, United States
Clinical Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States
Clinical Research Site
New York, New York, 10018, United States
Clinical Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, United States
Clinical Research Site
San Cristóbal, Dominican Republic
Clinical Research Site
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
Clinical Research Site
San Pedro Sula, Honduras
Clinical Research Site
Ponce, 00716, Puerto Rico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Sciences Program Lead
- Organization
- Mylan Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2014
First Posted
March 24, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 26, 2023
Results First Posted
January 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2023-04