RCT of an Internet-based CBT Program for Sexuality and Intimacy Problems in Women Treated for Breast Cancer
KIS
A Randomized Study of an Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Sexuality and Intimacy Problems in Women Treated for Breast Cancer.
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program in alleviating problems with intimacy and sexuality in women treated for breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
October 1, 2016
4.5 years
March 7, 2014
August 26, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Sexuality problems
Sexuality problems are assessed using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Scale, and Female Sexual Distress Scale.
Baseline
Intimacy problems.
Intimacy problems are assessed using the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR) Inventory.
Baseline
Sexuality problems
Sexuality problems are assessed using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Scale, and Female Sexual Distress Scale.
T1: 10 weeks after start of therapy (intervention group) or 13 weeks after completion of baseline (control group)
Sexuality problems
Sexuality problems are assessed using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Scale, and Female Sexual Distress Scale.
T2: 20-24 weeks after start of therapy (intervention group) or 23 weeks after completion of baseline (control group)
Sexuality problems
Sexuality problems are assessed using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Scale, and Female Sexual Distress Scale.
T3: 3 months after T2 (intervention group)
Intimacy problems.
Intimacy problems are assessed using the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR) Inventory.
T1: 10 weeks after start of therapy (intervention group) or 13 weeks after completion of baseline (control group)
Intimacy problems.
Intimacy problems are assessed using the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR) Inventory.
T2: 20-24 weeks after start of therapy (intervention group) or 23 weeks after completion of baseline (control group)
Intimacy problems.
Intimacy problems are assessed using the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR) Inventory.
T3: 3 months after T2 (intervention group)
Sexuality problems
Sexuality problems are assessed using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Scale, and Female Sexual Distress Scale.
T4: 6 months after T3 (intervention group)
Intimacy problems
Intimacy problems are assessed using the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR) Inventory.
T4: 6 months after T3 (intervention group)
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Body image.
Baseline
Menopausal symptoms.
Baseline
Marital functioning.
Baseline
Psychological distress
Baseline
Health-related quality of life
Baseline
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Minimal intervention control group
NO INTERVENTIONWomen who are assigned to the control group will be contacted by telephone by a member of the study staff to inform them about this allocation. They will receive a booklet per mail that addresses 80 questions about sexuality and cancer. Six weeks later, they will receive an empathetic phone call from one of the sexologists, during which there is also time available to discuss further questions the participants may have concerning sexuality and cancer. The purpose of keeping in contact with the control group, as opposed to a pure waiting list control group, is creating the opportunity to provide some control for a possible attention placebo-effect. The final questionnaire will be completed twenty weeks post study entry, after which women will be given the opportunity to undergo the internet-based cognitive behavioral program.
Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy
EXPERIMENTALEach woman who is allocated to the intervention group is assigned a personal sexologist (therapist) who guides her through the internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program and provides feedback on the homework assignments. The CBT program comprises a maximum of ten treatment modules that can be used in varying order. Each module contains three interventions and a personal evaluation form to report on the intervention. Each intervention comprises the following elements: 1) introduction, 2) psycho-education about symptoms, 3) "homework" assignments (e.g. relaxation techniques (pelvis); discuss intimacy with partner; sensate focus) and 4) reporting back to the therapist and receiving feedback on the "homework" assignments. Each week there are two "practice" sessions of 30 minutes each and one hour per week to report on/evaluate the intervention. The therapy has a mean duration of 20 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Woman.
- Between 18 and 65 years of age.
- Diagnosis of histologically confirmed primary breast cancer.
- Received treatment in one of the participating hospitals.
- Completed treatment for breast cancer(with the exception of endocrine therapy).
- Diagnosis of breast cancer between 6 months and 5 years prior to study entry.
- Disease-free at time of study entry.
- Presence of sexuality and intimacy problems.
You may not qualify if:
- Lacks basic proficiency in Dutch.
- No access to the internet.
- Serious cognitive or psychiatric problems (i.e. depression, alcohol dependency, or psychotic disorders).
- Severe relationship problems for which the internet-based program is not designed (and which need to be addressed prior to undergoing sex therapy).
- Participation in a concurrent therapy program to alleviate sexuality/intimacy problems.
- Treated for another type of cancer beside breast cancer (with the exception of cervical carcinoma in situ and basal cell carcinoma).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Netherlands Cancer Institutelead
- Dutch Cancer Societycollaborator
- Pink Ribbon Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands
Related Publications (24)
Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, Lutz JM, De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Baili P, Rachet B, Gatta G, Hakulinen T, Micheli A, Sant M, Weir HK, Elwood JM, Tsukuma H, Koifman S, E Silva GA, Francisci S, Santaquilani M, Verdecchia A, Storm HH, Young JL; CONCORD Working Group. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol. 2008 Aug;9(8):730-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70179-7. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
PMID: 18639491BACKGROUNDDutch Comprehensive Cancer Centre. Breast cancer survival in the Netherlands. 2011. Ref Type: Report
BACKGROUNDBasson R, Leiblum S, Brotto L, Derogatis L, Fourcroy J, Fugl-Meyer K, Graziottin A, Heiman JR, Laan E, Meston C, Schover L, van Lankveld J, Schultz WW. Revised definitions of women's sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2004 Jul;1(1):40-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10107.x.
PMID: 16422982BACKGROUNDBeckmann J, Johansen L, Richardt C, Blichert-Toft M. Psychological reactions in younger women operated on for breast cancer. Amputation versus resection of the breast with special reference to body-image, sexual identity and sexual function. Dan Med Bull. 1983 Dec;30 Suppl 2:10-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 6673909BACKGROUNDBloom JR, Stewart SL, Chang S, Banks PJ. Then and now: quality of life of young breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2004 Mar;13(3):147-60. doi: 10.1002/pon.794.
PMID: 15022150BACKGROUNDGilbert E, Ussher JM, Perz J. Sexuality after breast cancer: a review. Maturitas. 2010 Aug;66(4):397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.03.027. Epub 2010 May 2.
PMID: 20439140BACKGROUNDFobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, D'Onofrio C, Banks PJ, Bloom JR. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006 Jul;15(7):579-94. doi: 10.1002/pon.991.
PMID: 16287197BACKGROUNDGanz PA, Desmond KA, Belin TR, Meyerowitz BE, Rowland JH. Predictors of sexual health in women after a breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2371-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2371.
PMID: 10561299BACKGROUNDGanz PA, Greendale GA, Petersen L, Kahn B, Bower JE. Breast cancer in younger women: reproductive and late health effects of treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 15;21(22):4184-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.196.
PMID: 14615446BACKGROUNDPanjari M, Bell RJ, Davis SR. Sexual function after breast cancer. J Sex Med. 2011 Jan;8(1):294-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02034.x. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
PMID: 21199377BACKGROUNDSadovsky R, Basson R, Krychman M, Morales AM, Schover L, Wang R, Incrocci L. Cancer and sexual problems. J Sex Med. 2010 Jan;7(1 Pt 2):349-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01620.x.
PMID: 20092444BACKGROUNDSchover LR. Premature ovarian failure and its consequences: vasomotor symptoms, sexuality, and fertility. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 10;26(5):753-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1655.
PMID: 18258983BACKGROUNDBredart A, Dolbeault S, Savignoni A, Besancenet C, This P, Giami A, Michaels S, Flahault C, Falcou MC, Asselain B, Copel L. Prevalence and associated factors of sexual problems after early-stage breast cancer treatment: results of a French exploratory survey. Psychooncology. 2011 Aug;20(8):841-50. doi: 10.1002/pon.1789. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
PMID: 20568085BACKGROUNDBroeckel JA, Thors CL, Jacobsen PB, Small M, Cox CE. Sexual functioning in long-term breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Oct;75(3):241-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1019953027596.
PMID: 12353813BACKGROUNDFobair P, Spiegel D. Concerns about sexuality after breast cancer. Cancer J. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):19-26. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31819587bb.
PMID: 19197169BACKGROUNDKedde, H and Haastrecht, P. Sexual related health of young women with breast cancer. 2008. Utrecht, Rutger Nisso Groep. Ref Type: Report
BACKGROUNDKrychman ML, Pereira L, Carter J, Amsterdam A. Sexual oncology: sexual health issues in women with cancer. Oncology. 2006;71(1-2):18-25. doi: 10.1159/000100521. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
PMID: 17347586BACKGROUNDBurwell SR, Case LD, Kaelin C, Avis NE. Sexual problems in younger women after breast cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2815-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2499.
PMID: 16782919BACKGROUNDGanz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE. Life after breast cancer: understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):501-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.501.
PMID: 9469334BACKGROUNDBaucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, Gremore TM, Wiesenthal N, Aldridge W, Fredman SJ, Stanton SE, Scott JL, Halford KW, Keefe FJ. A couple-based intervention for female breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2009 Mar;18(3):276-83. doi: 10.1002/pon.1395.
PMID: 18702064BACKGROUNDDorval M, Guay S, Mondor M, Masse B, Falardeau M, Robidoux A, Deschenes L, Maunsell E. Couples who get closer after breast cancer: frequency and predictors in a prospective investigation. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3588-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.628.
PMID: 15908669BACKGROUNDHawkins Y, Ussher J, Gilbert E, Perz J, Sandoval M, Sundquist K. Changes in sexuality and intimacy after the diagnosis and treatment of cancer: the experience of partners in a sexual relationship with a person with cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2009 Jul-Aug;32(4):271-80. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b5a93.
PMID: 19444088BACKGROUNDHuyghe E, Sui D, Odensky E, Schover LR. Needs assessment survey to justify establishing a reproductive health clinic at a comprehensive cancer center. J Sex Med. 2009 Jan;6(1):149-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01005.x. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
PMID: 18823323BACKGROUNDHummel SB, van Lankveld JJ, Oldenburg HS, Hahn DE, Broomans E, Aaronson NK. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for sexual dysfunctions in women treated for breast cancer: design of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;15:321. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1320-z.
PMID: 25927495DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neil K. Aaronson, PhD
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacques J. van Lankveld, PhD
Open University, the Netherlands
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hester S. Oldenburg, PhD
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniela Hahn, MSc
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2014
First Posted
March 19, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-10