Aesthetic Evaluation of Different Abutment Materials for OsseoSpeed Implants
Aesthetic Outcome of Osseospeed Implants With Three Different Abutment Materials. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the study was to assess the aesthetic outcome of different abutments materials and shapes on dental implants . A set of parameters, including assessments of the mucosa and periodontal tissue , soft tissue , radiographic evaluations and clinical photographs, was used to obtain a measure of the aesthetic of implant-prosthesis rehabilitations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2014
CompletedMarch 18, 2014
March 1, 2014
1.5 years
March 14, 2014
March 14, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
aesthetic evaluation
measure of how the implant-prosthesis restoration is able to comply with the color, shape and proportions imitating as much as possible natural dentition.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
implant survival rate
12 months
Study Arms (5)
titanium 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORtitanium abutment type 1
titanium 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORtitanium abutment type 2
zirconia 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORzirconia abutment type 1
zirconia 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORzirconia abutment type 2
titanium nitrate
ACTIVE COMPARATORtitanium nitrate abutment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged over 18 years
- dental implant rehabilitation requested
- at least 1 tooth missing in areas between 1.5-3.5 and 3.5-4.5
- sufficient bone volume for implant placement ( length 10-15mm; diameter 2.5-4mm, bone quality between class I and III of Lekholm and Zarb).
- informed consensus acceptance
You may not qualify if:
- systemic pathologies that represent controindication to implantology
- smoking (more than 10 cigarettes per day)
- severe bruxism
- untreated periodontitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics of the University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte
Siena, Siena, 53100, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2014
First Posted
March 18, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 18, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03