NCT02086123

Brief Summary

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) has gained wide acceptance in the treatment of various pathology from diverticular disease to colon cancer. In comparison to conventional open surgery LCS has the benefits of shorter hospital stay, reduced postoperative pain, lower wound-related complication rates, better cosmetic results and earlier return to normal activities. Despite the fact that laparoscopic colorectal surgery is done through smaller incisions, there is still a considerable amount of abdominal wall trauma with these procedures. This still can cause a significant amount of postoperative discomfort, which can add to patients' stress, decreased satisfaction, and prolong length of hospital stay. Postoperative pain can be difficult to control and has been mainly managed pharmacologically with the use of narcotics and non-narcotic medications delivered through different routes. The effectiveness of pain control depends on the medication, its dosage, frequency and route of administration. The latter is mainly achieved through the intravenous route in the immediate postoperative period in laparoscopic colorectal surgery patient, as patients are restricted from having anything by mouth until return of bowel function. Another route of delivery is the use of local anesthetics as well as opioids via an epidural catheter. Epidural analgesia (EA) has the potential to offer excellent pain control and decrease the rate of postoperative ileus. Despite the extensive use of epidural anesthesia in obstetrics, to date there has been very few studies looking at the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of epidural analgesia as compared to conventional analgesia on the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal procedures. The secondary objectives of the study will be to evaluate patient satisfaction, quality of life, pain control and return of bowel function in patients treated with either epidural analgesia or intravenous narcotics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
87

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 13, 2014

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

AnalgesiaEpidural AnalgesiaNarcotic AnalgesiaPatient Controlled AnalgesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaAnti inflammatory AnalgesicsNSAIDS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Length of Hospital Stay

    The primary end point of the analyses is length of hospital stay from the date of admission for the surgical procedure to the day of hospital discharge.

    1-7 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Return of bowel function

    1-7 days

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Intensity of postoperative pain.

    1-7 days

Study Arms (2)

Epidural Analgesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive Bupivacaine + Fentanyl Epidural Analgesia. Subjects on this group could be allowed to receive Toradol Intravenously (IV) + Acetaminophen Orally (PO) if needed.

Procedure: Epidural Analgesia

Parenteral Analgesia (Intravenous)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects randomized to this arm will receive Analgesia with Dilaudid 0.2 -0.4 mg Intravenously (IV) every 3 hours. Subjects on this group could be allowed to receive Toradol Intravenously (IV) + Acetaminophen Orally (PO) if needed.

Procedure: Parenteral Analgesia (Intravenous)

Interventions

Bupivacaine + Fentanyl

Epidural Analgesia

Dilaudid 0.2 -0.4 mg IV every 3 hours

Parenteral Analgesia (Intravenous)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Subjects undergoing laparoscopic large bowel resection or rectal resection with anastomosis and/ or any type of ostomy (end, diverting)
  • University of California, Irvine Medical Center inpatients and outpatients scheduled for surgery
  • Elective surgery for benign and malignant conditions

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergency procedure including procedures done for bowel obstruction, constriction, fulminant inflammation
  • Infection
  • Patient participating in other trials that may affect the study outcome
  • Subjects with hypersensitivity to any of the anesthesia drugs used per Standard of Care at UCI Medical Center
  • Subjects with history of chronic pain
  • Pregnant patients or nursing females
  • Subjects with a history of severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, hematologic or systemic disease
  • Early Study Termination due to conversion to Open Surgery (subjects who were converted from laparoscopic to open surgery
  • Contraindication to epidural anesthesia (bleeding diathesis, severe hypovolemia, elevated intracranial pressure, infection at the site of injection, and severe stenotic valvular heart disease or ventricular outflow obstruction.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California, Irvine Medical Center

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Stefanou AJ, Reickert CA, Velanovich V, Falvo A, Rubinfeld I. Laparoscopic colectomy significantly decreases length of stay compared with open operation. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):144-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1840-9. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

    PMID: 21792714BACKGROUND
  • Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2.

    PMID: 16034888BACKGROUND
  • Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD005200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub2.

    PMID: 17054246BACKGROUND
  • Kavanagh DO, Gibson D, Moran DC, Smith M, O Donnell K, Eguare E, Keane FB, O Riordain DS, Neary PC. Short-term outcomes following laparoscopic resection for colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;26(3):361-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1069-4. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

    PMID: 20972571BACKGROUND
  • Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK, Brennan TJ. Postoperative pain--clinical implications of basic research. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Mar;21(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.11.003.

    PMID: 17489216BACKGROUND
  • Panchal SJ, Muller-Schwefe P, Wurzelmann JI. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: prevalence, pathophysiology and burden. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jul;61(7):1181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01415.x. Epub 2007 May 4.

    PMID: 17488292BACKGROUND
  • Kehlet H, Holte K. Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg. 2001 Nov;182(5A Suppl):3S-10S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00781-4.

    PMID: 11755891BACKGROUND
  • Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F; Postoperative Pain Forum Group. Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Jun;94(6):665-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5825.

    PMID: 17514701BACKGROUND
  • Taqi A, Hong X, Mistraletti G, Stein B, Charlebois P, Carli F. Thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates the restoration of bowel function and dietary intake in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection using a traditional, nonaccelerated, perioperative care program. Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):247-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0069-5. Epub 2006 Dec 9.

    PMID: 17160649BACKGROUND
  • Turunen P, Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Kairaluoma P, Wikstrom H, Kruuna O, Pere P, Bachmann M, Sarna S, Scheinin T. Epidural analgesia diminished pain but did not otherwise improve enhanced recovery after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0100-0. Epub 2008 Sep 24.

    PMID: 18814016BACKGROUND
  • Neudecker J, Schwenk W, Junghans T, Pietsch S, Bohm B, Muller JM. Randomized controlled trial to examine the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Br J Surg. 1999 Oct;86(10):1292-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01242.x.

    PMID: 10540136BACKGROUND
  • Senagore AJ, Whalley D, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Duepree HJ, Fazio VW. Epidural anesthesia-analgesia shortens length of stay after laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign pathology. Surgery. 2001 Jun;129(6):672-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.114648.

    PMID: 11391364BACKGROUND
  • Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W, Fry C, Rockall TA. Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1068-78. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7545. Epub 2011 May 17.

    PMID: 21590762BACKGROUND
  • Carli F, Trudel JL, Belliveau P. The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Aug;44(8):1083-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02234626.

    PMID: 11535845BACKGROUND
  • Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Dugan A, Fazio VW. Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Br J Surg. 2003 Oct;90(10):1195-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4223.

    PMID: 14515286BACKGROUND
  • Zingg U, Miskovic D, Hamel CT, Erni L, Oertli D, Metzger U. Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative pain relief and ileus after laparoscopic colorectal resection : Benefit with epidural analgesia. Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):276-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9888-x. Epub 2008 Mar 25.

    PMID: 18363059BACKGROUND
  • Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6.

    PMID: 7891489BACKGROUND
  • Lin MC, Huang JY, Lao HC, Tsai PS, Huang CJ. Epidural analgesia with low-concentration levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl provides satisfactory postoperative analgesia for colorectal surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2010 Jun;48(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/S1875-4597(10)60016-1.

    PMID: 20643364BACKGROUND
  • Gupta A, Bjornsson A, Fredriksson M, Hallbook O, Eintrei C. Reduction in mortality after epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing rectal but not colonic cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis of data from 655 patients in central Sweden. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Aug;107(2):164-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer100. Epub 2011 May 17.

    PMID: 21586443BACKGROUND
  • Apfelbaum JL, Gan TJ, Zhao S, Hanna DB, Chen C. Reliability and validity of the perioperative opioid-related symptom distress scale. Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):699-709. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000133143.60584.38.

    PMID: 15333398BACKGROUND
  • Lehmann N, Joshi GP, Dirkmann D, Weiss M, Gulur P, Peters J, Eikermann M. Development and longitudinal validation of the overall benefit of analgesia score: a simple multi-dimensional quality assessment instrument. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;105(4):511-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq186. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

    PMID: 20693179BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeAgnosia

Interventions

Analgesia, Epidural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Alessio Pigazzi, MD

    University of California, Irvine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor and Interim Chair of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2013

First Posted

March 13, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

March 1, 2015

Study Completion

April 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 14, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations