NCT02321787

Brief Summary

The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether utilizing ultrasound assessment during caudal epidural injection can reliably identify unrecognized and unsuccessful nerve blocks during the procedure, guide proper technique, and alter pain management outcome measurements for patients. Patients will be randomized to a group either undergoing caudal injection by a trainee using typical techniques or by using typical techniques in addition to ultrasound for confirmation of successful injection. The patients enrolled in this study will have the same intraoperative care, in line with the standard of care. Data will be collected intraoperatively and postoperatively on pain scores, time for performance of caudal block, and perceived success of the block. There will be no direct benefit to the patients enrolled in this study, but future patients may benefit from the use of ultrasound for the confirmation of a successful block.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2014

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 22, 2014

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 15, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 17, 2014

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Anesthesia, CaudalUltrasonography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of block success in traditional group versus intervention (ultrasound) group

    Success in the ultrasonographic group will be estimated by ultrasound spread and in the traditional group by heart rate, need for additional medications, and pain scores.

    4 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Opioid Administration

    4 hours

Study Arms (2)

Traditional Methods of Assessment

NO INTERVENTION

The caudal block will be done using traditional means of assessment, not confirmed by ultrasound.

Ultrasound for Confirmation

EXPERIMENTAL

The caudal block will be performed utilizing ultrasound as an additional method of assessment for successful block (in addition to all traditional means of assessment).

Procedure: Ultrasound for confirmation of successful caudal block

Interventions

Use of ultrasound for confirmation of successful caudal block

Ultrasound for Confirmation

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Under the age of eight
  • kg or less
  • Who are undergoing lower abdominal, lower extremity orthopedic, or urological procedures in the operating room at Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago (Lurie Children's) and will have a caudal epidural injection performed by an anesthesia resident physician prior to surgical incision
  • Children will be the sole patient population for this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will be excluded if their ultrasound images are deemed inadequate for evaluation of epidural injection
  • The caudal injection is abandoned after unsuccessful attempts
  • The surgical incision is at or above the umbilicus

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Lundblad M, Lonnqvist PA, Eksborg S, Marhofer P. Segmental distribution of high-volume caudal anesthesia in neonates, infants, and toddlers as assessed by ultrasonography. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Feb;21(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03485.x. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

    PMID: 21159024BACKGROUND
  • Triffterer L, Machata AM, Latzke D, Willschke H, Rebhandl W, Kimberger O, Marhofer P. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: effect of the speed of injection of local anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;108(4):670-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer502. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

    PMID: 22315328BACKGROUND
  • Lundblad M, Eksborg S, Lonnqvist PA. Secondary spread of caudal block as assessed by ultrasonography. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;108(4):675-81. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer513. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

    PMID: 22315327BACKGROUND
  • Brenner L, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, Willschke H, Machata AM, Al-Zoraigi U, Lundblad M, Lonnqvist PA. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: the effect of different volumes of local anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Aug;107(2):229-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer128. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

    PMID: 21642642BACKGROUND
  • Raghunathan K, Schwartz D, Connelly NR. Determining the accuracy of caudal needle placement in children: a comparison of the swoosh test and ultrasonography. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Jul;18(7):606-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02529.x.

    PMID: 18616491BACKGROUND
  • Riccabona M. Basics, principles, techniques and modern methods in paediatric ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol. 2014 Sep;83(9):1487-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.032. Epub 2014 May 10.

    PMID: 24932845BACKGROUND
  • Schuepfer G, Konrad C, Schmeck J, Poortmans G, Staffelbach B, Johr M. Generating a learning curve for pediatric caudal epidural blocks: an empirical evaluation of technical skills in novice and experienced anesthetists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):385-8. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.7590.

    PMID: 10925935BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

High-Energy Shock Waves

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic WavesSoundRadiation, NonionizingRadiationPhysical Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2014

First Posted

December 22, 2014

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

January 15, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-01

Locations