The Factors That Affected the Outcome of Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
Case Control Study of the Factors That Affected the Outcome of Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
1 other identifier
observational
800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to investigate various potential factors that affected the outcome of treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2014
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2014
CompletedMarch 7, 2014
March 1, 2014
28 days
March 5, 2014
March 5, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
probing success: both anatomical patency of the duct and functional free of symptoms
one week
Study Arms (1)
Probing, topical anesthesia
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is a quite common condition among the infants. An imperforate membrane at the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct is the main cause of occlusion. Children with the signs of NLDO presenting with epiphora and/or mucous discharge were included in this study. Intervention with probing under topical anesthesia was performed on the same surgeon. And success rate was evaluated.
Interventions
A punctal dilator was used for dilating the punctum. The nasolacrimal system was irrigated through either the lower or upper punctum with a hollow 23-gauge irrigating cannula attached to a syringe. A #0 (or #00) Bowman probe was passed through either the lower or upper canaliculus into the lacrimal sac and then directed downward through the nasolacrimal duct into nasal cavity. A "Hard" resistance could be felt as the probe touched the end of the nasolacrimal duct. A "Pop" tactile sensation might be noted while the probe passing through an obstruction at the valve of Hasner.
Eligibility Criteria
primary care clinic
You may qualify if:
- a history of tearing and/or mucopurulent discharge beginning during the first few weeks of life
- anatomical nasolacrimal duct obstruction
You may not qualify if:
- previous probing
- glaucoma
- trauma
- lid malpositions
- craniofacial anomalies
- congenital mucocele of the nasolacrimal sac
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Ophthalmology, Cathay General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan, 106, Taiwan
Related Publications (2)
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Repka MX, Chandler DL, Beck RW, Crouch ER 3rd, Donahue S, Holmes JM, Lee K, Melia M, Quinn GE, Sala NA, Schloff S, Silbert DI, Wallace DK. Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with probing in children younger than 4 years. Ophthalmology. 2008 Mar;115(3):577-584.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.030. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
PMID: 17996306BACKGROUNDMiller AM, Chandler DL, Repka MX, Hoover DL, Lee KA, Melia M, Rychwalski PJ, Silbert DI; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Beck RW, Crouch ER 3rd, Donahue S, Holmes JM, Quinn GE, Sala NA, Schloff S, Wallace DK, Foster NC, Frick KD, Golden RP, Lambert SR, Tien DR, Weakley DR Jr. Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants. J AAPOS. 2014 Feb;18(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.10.016.
PMID: 24568978BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chih Heng Hung, M.D.
Department of Ophthalmology, Cathay General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2014
First Posted
March 7, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03