Safety and Efficacy Study of Besivance™ for Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children
A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Parallel-Group, Randomized Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Besivance™ for Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of the study is to evaluate the application of Besivance™ (besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension, 0.6%) to treat congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children. The hypothesis of the study is that Besivance™ is as safe and effective as the current standard of care for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Sep 2011
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 9, 2016
CompletedJuly 14, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.8 years
September 6, 2011
December 23, 2015
June 15, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Physician-rated Scale of NLDO From Baseline to Follow-Up Visit at Week 8 or From Baseline to Time of Treatment Failure, if Earlier.
The NLDO grading scale in the study eye at every visit. The scale ranges from 0 to +4: * 0: No tearing and discharge. * 1: Tearing, moderate mucous discharge around nasolacrimal punctum * 2: Moderate redness of the medial eyelid with mucous discharge * 3: Redness and swelling of the eyelid with mucopurulent discharge * 4: Redness and swelling of eyelid with purulent discharge Due to varying baseline severity (measured by NLDO grade) among subjects, change from baseline to week 8 in NLDO grade was further classified as the following: Treatment success: grade of 0 or improvement by 2 or more compared to the prior visit. Recurrence: NLDO with infection returns in the study eye, as indicated by a NLDO grade \>0 after a grade of 0 at the prior visit. Treatment Failure: grade is worse than or same as the baseline visit.
Baseline to Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of Recurrences by Randomization Group
Baseline to Week 16 (Closeout Visit )
Efficacy of Recurrence Treatment as Measured by Change in the Physician- Rated Scale of NLDO
Baseline to Week 16 (Closeout Visit)
Treatment Failure
Baseline to the time of failure or Week 16 (Closeout Visit)
Medication Safety Outcomes
Baseline to Week 16 (Closeout Visit )
Study Arms (2)
Besivance Treatment Group
EXPERIMENTALBesivance™ ophthalmic suspension, 0.6%
Polytrim Treatment Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPolytrim ophthalmic solution
Interventions
Subjects Receive Besivance™ ophthalmic suspension, 0.6% one drop in the study eye three times daily (TID) for 10 days.
Subjects receive Polytrim ophthalmic solution one drop in the study eye three times daily (TID) for 10 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Persons who have been diagnosed with congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (NLDO) with infection by the Principal Investigator
- Both males and females
- Persons who are age of 1 to 12 months at time of diagnosis (time of diagnosis is defined as when the Principal Investigator makes clinical diagnosis.)
You may not qualify if:
- Persons who have received any antibiotic treatment for NLDO with infection for more than 2 week in the past 4 weeks.
- Persons who are currently receiving systemic antibiotic treatment that cannot be discontinued.
- Persons with any other ocular anomalies that could potentially interfere with interpretation of study results.
- Persons who have had any prior nasolacrimal duct system procedures such as stenting or probing.
- Persons who have previously participated in any clinical trial(s) of Besivance™
- Persons who have participated in any other clinical trial(s) of any investigational agent(s) within 30 days prior to the Baseline visit
- Persons who have any chronic diseases that might interfere with study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, RUTGERS-New Jersey Medical School
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations include the small sample size which was reduced by participant drop out.We enrolled 24 subjects, completed and collected primary outcome measure data on 20.The recurrence rate was low at 10% (2 subjects), limiting secondary data analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Suqin Guo, MD
- Organization
- NJMS, Rutgers University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suqin Guo, M.D.
Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, RUTGERS-New Jersey Medical School
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2011
First Posted
September 9, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 14, 2016
Results First Posted
June 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03